The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal. It focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development, serving as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues.
Coverage includes original research articles, new developments, case studies and critical reviews in all aspects of scientific and engineering research on coal, coal utilizations and coal mining. Among the broad topics receiving attention are coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology; coal mining theory, technology and engineering; coal processing, utilization and conversion; coal mining environment and reclamation and related aspects.
The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs so authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.
The journal operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous.
A forum for new research findings, case studies and discussion of important challenges in coal science and mining development
Offers an international perspective on coal geology, coal mining, technology and engineering, coal processing, utilization and conversion, coal mining environment and reclamation and more
Published with the China Coal Society
Research Article
Open Access
Published: 27 November 2015
0 Accesses
International Journal of Coal Science & Technology Volume 2, 269-278, (2015)
1.
Faculty of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, Suez University, Suez, Egypt
In underground constructions, a good ventilation design not only delivers fresh air to establish good working environment, but also provides a scientific and reliable basis to prevent disasters. In emergency cases, unexpected closure of the main airways may occur, providing the workers with alternative airways is substantial. This is important not only to sustain personnel lives, but also to prevent the mine ventilation system from damage. In this research, alternate solutions were introduced in case of failure in the underground construction to keep a pre-assigned fixed quantity in a working place for mine ventilation network. Eight different collapse scenarios were proposed to study their effect on the air quantity distribution among the branches in the ventilation circuit. From these scenarios, it is found that providing a sufficient air quantity in the working places could be achieved through modification of the network topology and adjusting the values of the regulators pressure. It is also indicated that the distance between the collapse and working places has a great effect on the amount of air delivered to it. A reduction in the power consumption could be done by re-arrange the installed regulators and decreasing the number of nodes and branches inside the network. A relationship representing the effect of changing the network topology on the total network power consumption was deduced through regression analysis. It is found that the total network power is quadratic dependent on the number of regulators and number of branches while it is directly dependent on the regulator power.
A good mine ventilation design should maintain adequate airflow through mine working areas all the time even in case of emergency. It does not only conform to the safety and health standards and federal regulations, as defined by the Mine Safety and Health (MSHA), but also lower the cost of air supply (U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 2014).Providing continuous fresh air to the mine dilutes and removes noxious gas and dust. It also adjusts the climate in the underground mine workings, and consequently establishing a good working environment (Sui et al. 2011). Mining accidents may have a variety of causes, including leakage of poisonous gases (such as hydrogen sulfide) or explosive natural gases, especially firedamp or methane, or gas outburst or gas explosion, dust explosions, collapsing of minestopes, mining-induced seismicity, flooding, or common mechanical errors from improperly used or malfunctioning mining equipment (safety lamps or electrical equipment). The improper use of explosives underground can also cause methane and coal-dust explosions (Terazawa et al. 1985; Kucuker 2006).
Thousands of miners die from mining accidents each year, especially in the processes of coal and hard rock mining. Deaths nowadays not only occur in underdeveloped countries and their rural parts, but also in developing states. On April 5, 2010: Upper Big Branch Mine disaster, West Virginia, United States. An explosion occurred in Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch coal. Twenty-nine out of thirty-one miners at the site were killed. November 19, 2010: Pike River Mine disaster in New Zealand. The coal mine exploded. Twenty-nine men underground died immediately, or shortly afterwards, from the blast or from the toxic atmosphere. May 13, 2014: Soma mine disaster took place in Soma, Turkey. The accident, called the worst mining accident ever in Turkey, and it is the worst mining accident in the 21st century so far. 301 people died and at least 80 workers were injured (Mining-Technology 2014; Retzer 2014; Schleifer 2014).
Distribution of air flow among the airways in mine ventilation systems may occur either naturally or by adding control devices (fans or regulators). Natural splitting occurs when the air flows in airways of a ventilation system divided among airways according to their aerodynamic resistance. For controlled splitting, a prescribed quantity of air flow is circulated through each or some of the airways. In practice, most mine ventilation systems utilize controlled splitting (Wang 1990). To eliminate the risk of mine ventilation hazards, novel optimization scheme alternatives for the complex network variables should be adopted to be rapidly applied in case of emergency to eliminate hazards. Therefore, determination of the locations and sizes of these ventilation control devices representa main challenge in design and analysis of mine ventilation systems (Wang et al. 1985; Wu and Topuz 1987).
Mathematically, a mine ventilation network problem is defined by a system of network equations and variables. The variables usually include air quantities, regulator pressure losses and fan pressures. The general rules for building an optimal mathematical model of a ventilation network are to satisfy: (i) Kirchhoff’s current and voltage laws, and (ii) Atkinson’s equation.
For a network that has N nodes and B branches, there will be at least B independent network equations in N variables. Several operations research methods have been applied to determine locations and sizes of ventilation control devices in the mine ventilation networks, including linear programming, network analysis, nonlinear programming, and simulation (Wang 1982, 1984; Bhamidipati and Topuz 1983; Wu and Topuz 1987; Hu and Longson 1990; Wu 1991; Kumar et al. 1995; El-Nagdy 2013; Nyaaba et al. 2014).
In this work, possible alternate solutions have been discussed in case of failure in the underground construction for a theoretical mine ventilation network. The effect of roof collapses or area isolation on the air quantity distribution among the branches in the ventilation circuit is also investigated. This work does not only study the effect of mine ventilation network topology changes on the power consumed but also sustaining the air quantity in the fixed quantity branch unchanged regardless the location and the size of failure. This can be done by modifying the topology and adjusting the regulators used according to the air quantity flow through them.
An ideal solution should satisfy the necessary air flow distribution and a predefined objective. The applicable objectives are minimizing the power consumption, accordingly, minimizing the overall cost of ventilation. The aims of this work are:
To study the effects of isolating a part of a mine on the stability of mine ventilation system.
To keep the air quantity unchanged in the fixed quantity branch while delivering a sufficient air quantity enough to sustain the workers lives in case of emergency.
To minimize the power consumed.
To formulate a relation between themine ventilation topology and the total power consumed through the network.
In normal ventilation situation, the target is safe, economic and feasible. Safety and feasibility are usually reflected from the required airflow quantity, the lower and upper limit of airflow quantity and control variable and the controllability of branches. Thus, the objective function of optimum control problem usually considers economic aspect at first. That is, to make the ventilation fee as less as possible. During emergencies, the economic factor is minor and the difficulty of control facility installation is relatively important. So that, the optimization during mine crisis period mainly aims to make the number of control facilities as less as possible and the control quantity as lower as possible, which is convenient for temporary control measures. Because the control facility number is the calculated number of branches whose control variables are not zero. Then it is an object optimization problem about integer programming, which is difficult to get the result. In order to simplify the solving process, it is necessary to combine control variables and control facility number into one objective function and make the optimum scheme which is a kind of compromise between them. However, it is not easy to find an idea objective function (Wu and Li 1993). Depending upon these hypotheses the main objective function in this model will be a compromise to include economic and safety factors.
The main objective of the nonlinear programming model is to minimize the overall air power consumed through the mine ventilation network, Z. The air power is supplied by the fans and can be expressed as
where B, q j , and t j are, number of branches, air quantity, and fan pressure in branch j, respectively. The overall air power is used to overcome branch and regulator pressure losses. Alternatively, it can be expressed as
where r j and s j are the resistance factor and regulator pressure in branch j, respectively.
Mine ventilation system, as a network, must obey or comply with Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL)and Kirchhoff’s voltage law (KVL). Accordingly, the algebraic sum of all pressure drops in a closed loop must equal zero (Wang 1983).
where a ij is the element of the reduced-incident matrix; N is the number of nodes; b ij is the element of the fundamental mesh matrix; M is the number of the fundamental meshes \( \left({M = B - N + 1} \right) \) and H j is the natural ventilation pressure in branch j. \( \left| {q_{j}} \right|q_{j} \) is used instead of \( q_{j}^{2} \) in order to preserve negative values if present. An additional constraint is the required air flow in each branch; this could be formulated as follows:
where \( q_{j}^{L} \) and \( q_{j}^{U} \) are lower and upper limits for air quantity flow in branch j, respectively.
To study the effect of isolation of a part of a mine on the stability of mine ventilation system, a network shown in Fig. 1 was solved using LINGO optimization software, version 14.0.1.58. This network example (Huang and Wang 1993a, b) consists of 53 branches, 23 nodes and three main fans installed in branches 51, 52 and 53. The mathematical formulation for this problem is a NLP, which entails 4 linear and 64 non-linear variables. The total number of constraints for air quantity flows, regulators and fan power are 191, where 32 of them are nonlinear constraints.
Network layout with collapse at suggested node shown
Eight different scenarios were created. The first five (A, B, C, D and E) are failure scenarios at different nodes 6, 7, 8, 3 and 21 respectively as shown in Fig. 1. All scenarios are solved two times, firstly, when the collapse happened and secondly, to keep the air quantity fixed at branch number 26 to be 40 m3/s. The total air quantity input to the network (q 1) is maintained fixed as in case before failure; q 1 = 318.5 m3/s. This can be done by redistributing that air quantity among airways via changing the values of regulators installed in regulator branches as listed in Table 1. Delivering more quantities from the main fans or constructing new regulators in different airways, which may take a long time especially in case of emergencies, is not applicable. The air quantities in each branch in both cases for each scenario are shown in Fig. 2.
No. (r j ) | r j (Ns2/m8) | Original solution | Scenario A failure @ node 6 | Scenario B failure @ node 7 | Scenario C failure @ node 8 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Failure | Fixed q26 | Failure | Fixed q26 | Failure | Fixed q26 | ||||||||||
Air flow q j (m3/s) | Regulator S i (Pa) | q j (m3/s) | S i (Pa) | q j (m3/s) | S i (Pa) | q j (m3/s) | S i (Pa) | q j (m3/s) | S i (Pa) | q j (m3/s) | S i (Pa) | q j (m3/s) | S i (Pa) | ||
1 | 0 | 318.5 | No | 318.5 | No | 318.5 | No | 318.5 | No | 318.5 | No | 318.5 | No | 318.5 | No |
2 | 0.0308 | 93.5 | No | 87.7 | No | 89 | No | 104 | No | 104 | No | 97 | No | 100.7 | No |
3 | 0.0118 | 136 | No | 136.2 | No | 137 | No | 121.5 | No | 121.5 | No | 136.7 | No | 137.2 | No |
4 | 0.0415 | 89 | No | 94.6 | No | 92.5 | No | 93 | No | 93 | No | 84.9 | No | 80.6 | No |
5 | 0.0555 | 30.5 | No | 18.1 | No | 20.2 | No | 53.5 | No | 53.5 | No | 35.3 | No | 40.3 | No |
6 | 0.04 | 52.7 | No | 61.7 | No | 57.7 | No | 67.9 | No | 67.9 | No | 44.3 | No | 34.4 | No |
7 | 0.0617 | 44.1 | No | 91.8 | No | 94.7 | No | 61.3 | No | 61 | No | 48.9 | No | 51.6 | No |
8 | 0.0237 | 69 | No | 0.1 | No | 0.1 | No | 96.1 | No | 96.5 | No | 72.2 | No | 77.7 | No |
9 | 0.7 | 10.8 | No | 13.9 | No | 14.4 | No | 0.1 | No | 0.1 | No | 11.2 | No | 11.7 | No |
10 | 0.048 | 52.8 | No | 56.4 | No | 59.1 | No | 0.1 | No | 0.1 | No | 57.1 | No | 62.4 | No |
11 | 0.165 | 11.7 | No | 1 | No | 14.5 | No | 0.1 | No | 0.1 | No | 21.6 | No | 29.1 | No |
12 | 0.404 | 30 | −1034 | 42.2 | −659 | 20 | −1336 | 55.3 | 0 | 58.4 | 0 | 47.6 | 0 | 44.7 | −453 |
13 | 0.04 | 57.9 | No | 64.2 | No | 65.6 | No | 60.1 | No | 59.2 | No | 0.1 | No | 0.1 | No |
14 | 0.125 | 42.1 | No | 49 | No | 50.1 | No | 45.3 | No | 43.1 | No | 59.7 | No | 41.2 | No |
15 | 0.06 | 10.9 | No | 0 | No | 0 | No | 14.8 | No | 12.1 | No | 19.8 | No | 18.7 | No |
16 | 0.075 | 20.3 | No | 0.1 | No | 0.1 | No | 0 | No | 0.1 | No | 22 | No | 24.9 | No |
17 | 0.111 | 27.9 | No | 34.9 | No | 35.8 | No | 31.8 | No | 28.9 | No | 0 | No | 0.1 | No |
18 | 0.425 | 25 | −1009 | 38.7 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 43.7 | 0 | 47.1 | 0 | 39.5 | 0 | 46.6 | 0 |
18\ | 0.75 | 30 | No | 53.1 | No | 53.8 | No | 32.4 | No | 25.9 | No | 29.2 | No | 23.8 | No |
19 | 0.65 | 40 | −649 | 0.1 | −1.2 | 0.1 | −154 | 45.6 | 0 | 46.7 | 0 | 43.3 | 0 | 48.2 | 0 |
20 | 0.815 | 38.5 | −105 | 0.1 | −1.2 | 0.1 | −66 | 0.1 | 0 | 37.8 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 35.7 | 0 |
21 | 1.75 | 20 | −644 | 28.1 | 0 | 28.9 | 0 | 0.1 | −1.3 | 0.1 | −133 | 21.7 | 0 | 24.9 | 0 |
22 | 1.25 | 20 | −874 | 18.9 | −933 | 34.2 | 0 | 0.1 | −1.3 | 0.1 | −144 | 25.9 | 0 | 30 | 0 |
23 | 2.4 | 15 | −877 | 24.2 | 0 | 24.8 | 0 | 0.1 | −1.3 | 0 | −1281 | 20.5 | 0 | 23.4 | 0 |
24 | 1.45 | 30 | 0 | 29.3 | 0 | 29.8 | −45.3 | 28.3 | 0 | 30.3 | 0 | 0.1 | −1.9 | 0 | −1248 |
25 | 0.65 | 30 | −838 | 45 | 0 | 45.9 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 32 | −741 | 34.6 | 0 | 1.2 | −1500 |
26 | 0.55 | 40 | −431 | 38.9 | −431 | 40 | −431 | 35.2 | −431 | 40 | −431 | 25.1 | −431 | 40 | −431 |
27 | 0.35 | 9.6 | No | 31.8 | No | 31.4 | No | 24.4 | No | 24.5 | No | 16.7 | No | 16.7 | No |
28 | 0.3 | 10 | No | 1 | No | 1 | No | 5.9 | No | 8.1 | No | 7.3 | No | 10.9 | No |
29 | 0.405 | 10.2 | No | 8.4 | No | 3.8 | No | 12.9 | No | 15.4 | No | 20.6 | No | 21.9 | No |
30 | 0.5 | 13.6 | No | 17.6 | No | 15.5 | No | 11.4 | No | 11.8 | No | 16.5 | No | 11.6 | No |
31 | 0.1975 | 45.4 | No | 60 | No | 63.3 | No | 51.7 | No | 48.6 | No | 52 | No | 53.6 | No |
32 | 1 | 20.4 | No | 19.4 | No | 21.5 | No | 19.4 | No | 17.6 | No | 22.1 | No | 23 | No |
33 | 1.3 | 22.7 | No | 25.2 | No | 24 | No | 21.3 | No | 22 | No | 23.2 | No | 24.9 | No |
34 | 0.667 | 15 | No | 14.4 | No | 13.8 | No | 13.6 | No | 14.8 | No | 16.8 | No | 18.6 | No |
35 | 0.048 | 49.8 | No | 53.7 | No | 51.4 | No | 48.5 | No | 51.2 | No | 60.1 | No | 63.7 | No |
36 | 0.5 | 12.4 | No | 14.8 | No | 15.6 | No | 9.5 | No | 7.7 | No | 1 | No | 1 | No |
37 | 0.24 | 29.2 | No | 29.5 | No | 27.3 | No | 20.3 | No | 26.3 | No | 23.7 | No | 32.7 | No |
38 | 0.08 | 53.6 | No | 56.5 | No | 55.5 | No | 46.6 | No | 51.8 | No | 41.6 | No | 51.6 | No |
39 | 0.0305 | 36.3 | No | 24 | No | 24.9 | No | 42.5 | No | 42 | No | 40.7 | No | 43.6 | No |
40 | 4 | 5.6 | No | 5 | No | 3.8 | No | 3.7 | No | 5,8 | No | 5.8 | No | 8 | No |
41 | 1 | 10.9 | No | 14.2 | No | 13.7 | No | 11.8 | No | 10.9 | No | 11.8 | No | 4.8 | No |
42 | 0.056 | 49.2 | No | 36.2 | No | 38.5 | No | 54.9 | No | 53.3 | No | 54.7 | No | 58.2 | No |
43 | 0.0297 | 56.6 | No | 43.3 | No | 46.4 | No | 61.9 | No | 59.6 | No | 62.7 | No | 66.6 | No |
44 | 1.625 | 14.9 | No | 13.4 | No | 15.7 | No | 15 | No | 12.9 | No | 16 | No | 16.3 | No |
45 | 0.25 | 45.6 | No | 52.5 | No | 50.1 | No | 43.1 | No | 43.9 | No | 45.3 | No | 47.9 | No |
46 | 3 | 11 | No | 12.1 | No | 11.2 | No | 9.8 | No | 11 | No | 10.9 | No | 11.1 | No |
47 | 0.08 | 54 | No | 65.2 | No | 63.3 | No | 54.1 | No | 53.3 | No | 52.3 | No | 37.2 | No |
48 | 0.0277 | 64.5 | No | 70.7 | No | 69.2 | No | 58.4 | No | 62.7 | No | 53.5 | No | 56.4 | No |
49 | 0.6 | 16.3 | No | 25.7 | No | 19.4 | No | 12.9 | No | 18.8 | No | 12.7 | No | 15.6 | No |
50 | 0.25 | 25.3 | No | 31.6 | No | 31.5 | No | 26.7 | No | 21.8 | No | 25.2 | No | 28.8 | No |
51 | 0.0159 | 104.4 | 2380 | 67.2 | 2251 | 81.2 | 2486 | 118.8 | 2299 | 106.9 | 2313 | 120.6 | 2033 | 125.5 | 2404 |
52 | 0.0123 | 110 | 2515 | 135 | 2800 | 125.1 | 2800 | 104 | 2307 | 106.5 | 2484 | 106.4 | 2038 | 117.2 | 2469 |
53 | 0.035 | 104.1 | 2586 | 113.3 | 2800 | 112.2 | 2800 | 95.7 | 2317 | 105.1 | 2612 | 91.5 | 2033 | 75.8 | 2295 |
Air quantity distributions
The last three scenarios Fig. 3 are designed to study the effect of the number of branches, nodes, regulators and regulator power, on the total power consumed by the main fans in the mine ventilation system. These three scenarios have been postulated by removing nodes 7, 12 and 17 and their associated branches respectively.
Network layouts for scenarios 6, 7 and 8, respectively
Isolation of a part of a mine could be due to fire, a roof collapse, gas outburst, gas explosion or any kind of emergency. Obviously, Air flow delivered to the branches in the network will be affected by this isolation. Air flow distribution among different airways in the system in all scenarios is shown in Fig. 2. Removing node 8, scenario C, represents the closest failure node to branch 26 while removing node 6, scenario A, is the furthest distance as shown in Fig. 1. It should be recognized that, the total air quantity delivered through the whole system is fixed (318.5 m3/s) in all scenarios. Figure 4 shows the air quantity in branch 26 in all failure scenarios. Air quantity in branch 26 dropped from 40 m3/s in the main scenario, before failure, to 25.1 m3/s when the failure happened at node 8. This indicates the extent of the risk that workers might be confronted if the collapse is close to workplaces. On the other hand, a small drop in the air quantity, 38.9 m3/s, happened when the collapse occurred in node 6. Failure at entrance or exit of the mine has almost the same effect on the air quantity of branch 26 (around 28 m3/s), as shown in scenarios D and E in the same figure.
Effect of distance from collapse on the air quantity in branch 26
Although regulators are installed in mine ventilation networks to control the distribution of air quantities among airways, they may increase the total pressure in the network. Consequently, this may increase the power delivered from the fans. Thus, a good mine ventilation design has an adequate number of regulators installed to deliver the pre assigned values of air quantities (Wang et al. 1985). Figure 5 shows the sum of the values of the consumed pressure through regulators in each scenario to keep the air quantity fixed at branch 26 as in the main case. An improvement in the value of the pressure consumed through regulators is recognized in all scenarios. The main case represents the worst pressure consumed (−4742 Pa), while scenario with failure at node 6 represents the best, −1556 Pa. This reduction in the consumed pressure may be due to the reduction in the number of airways resulting from the collapse.
Sum of the regulators pressure installed in each scenario
As shown in Fig. 6, the first five scenarios are not enough to study the effect of the network topology on the power consumed through the mine ventilation networks. The relation between the power in the main case (794 kW) before failure and the power in case of failure is not clear. It sometimes increases, as in scenarios A and D, or decreases as in scenarios C and E. In other cases, it may be almost the same as in scenario B. On the other hand, there is a recognized rise in the power consumption between all the cases of failure and that in cases of fixing air quantity at branch 26 at each node. In case of failure, the total power increased from 846.5, 734.8, 648.0, 829.8 and 641.1 kW to 866.3, 786.3, 765.0, 891.8 and 680.1 kW for a fixed quantity at branch 26 in scenarios A, B, C, D and E respectively. Therefore, three more scenarios have been introduced as shown in Fig. 3 to study the effect of changing the number of nodes and their associated branches on the power consumed through the mine ventilation networks. In these new scenarios, the number of airway branches have been reduced from 53 to 48, 45 and then to 41 by removing nodes 7, 12 and 17 respectively. Reducing the number of nodes and their connected branches has a great effect on reducing the power consumed through the network as shown in Fig. 7. The reduction in power may reach 50 % from the 53 branches (the main case) to the case of 41 braches.
Power consumed in each scenario
Effect of changing the topology of the network on the consumed power
On the other hand, there is a recognized saving in the power when more regulators are allowed to be installed in the network to keep the same air quantity passing through branch 26. A relation representing the effect of independent variables (number of branches; B, number of regulators; N r, and power losses through the regulator, S on the total power consumption, Z for the network in kW has been developed through regression analysis of the real data as following:
R 2 for the introduced correlation was found to be 0.97. That introduced correlation has been extracted from output results for networks of 53, 48 and 45 branches. An additional case of 41 branches has been taken to test and validate that correlation. The crossplots representing the predicted versus real values for total power at various number of branches, with different number of regulators and regulator power is shown in Fig. 8. It could be seen from this figure that there is an excellent agreements between models predicted values and real data. The plotted data points obtained by the new correlations are quite close to the perfect correlations of the 45° line. This shows that the introduced correlation is able to predict the total power consumed at different number of branches, number of regulators and power consumed through regulators (Lazic 2004).
Crossplot for total power representing predicted and real total power
Based on the air distribution requirements of the underground ventilation network, an optimization program is introduced, using LINGO optimization software, version 14.0.1.58. The effect of roof collapse and other kinds of failure on the stability of mine ventilation system have been studied using a theoretical mine ventilation network. Eight different scenarios were designed to study the effect of mine ventilation topology on the power consumption. This study verified that; a fixed air quantity can be held in the working place by adjusting the amount of regulators in the regulator branches, without any change in the total amount of air delivered to the mine or installing any new regulators. These adjustments in regulators quantities not only deliver the required amount of air to the working places but also reduce the power required through the mine ventilation network. An equation representing the effect of number of branches, number of regulators and power losses through them, on the total power consumption for the network has been given.
| [1] | Bhamidipati S, Topuz E (1983) A critical path crashing technique to optimize multiple fan ventilation systems, Preprint. In SME-AIME Annual meeting, Atlanta |
| [2] | El-Nagdy KA (2013) Stability of multiple fans in mine ventilation networks. Int J Min SciTechnol 23:569–571 |
| [3] | Hu W, Longson I (1990) The optimization of airflow distribution in ventilation networks using a nonlinear programming method. Min SciTechnol 10(2):209–219 |
| [4] | Huang C, Wang YJ (1993a) Mine-ventilation network optimization using the generalized reduced gradient method, vol 24. SME, Littleton, pp 153–161 |
| [5] | Huang C, Wang YJ (1993b) Mine ventilation network optimization using MINOS. In: The AusIMM Proceedings Vol. 2, Queensland, pp 47–52 |
| [6] | Kucuker H (2006) Occupational fatalities among coal mine workers in Zonguldak Turkey, 1994–2003. Occup Med (Lond) 56(2):144–146 |
| [7] | Kumar GV, Sastry VR, Rao GK (1995) Minimizing power consumption in multiple fan networks by optimum fan selection. In: Proceedings of the 7th US mine ventilation symposium, SME, Littleton, Co., pp 491–497 |
| [8] | Lazic ZR (2004) Design of experiments in chemical engineering, 1st edn. Wiley-CH Verlag GmbH, Weinlheim |
| [9] | Nyaaba W, El-Nagdy KA, Frimpong S (2014) Optimization of mine ventilation networks using the lagrangian algorithm for equality constraints. In: 12th international conference on mining, petroleum and metallurgical engineering MPM12, Suez University, 20–22 Oct 2014 |
| [10] | Retzer J (2014) Ten worst mining disasters. Bogey Media, Michigan |
| [11] | Schleifer Y (2014) Turkey: mine tragedy shines light on workplace safety concerns. The Turko-File, EurasiaNet, New York |
| [12] | Sui J, Yang L, Zhu Z, Fang H, Zhen H (2011) Mine ventilation optimization analysis and airflow control based on harmony annealing search. J Comput 6(6):1270–1277 |
| [13] | Terazawa K, Takatori T, Tomii S, Nakano K (1985) Methane asphyxia. Coal mine accident investigation of distribution of gas. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 6(3):211–214 |
| [14] | The world’s worst coal mining disasters (2014) http://www.mining-technology.com. Accessed 16 May 2014 |
| [15] | U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2014) Title 30—Mineral Resources; Chapter 1—Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration; Part 75—Mandatory Safety Standards Underground Coal Mines; Subpart D—Ventilation; Section 75.325—Air quantity, U.S. Government Printing Office, Office of Federal Regulations, March |
| [16] | Wang YJ (1982) Critical path approach to mine ventilation networks with controlled flow. Trans SME-AIME 272:1862–1872 |
| [17] | Wang YJ (1983) Minimizing power consumption in multiple-fan networks by equalizing fan pressure. Int J Rock Mech Min SciGeomech 20(4):171–179 |
| [18] | Wang YJ (1984) A non-linear programming formulation for mine ventilation networks with natural splitting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 21(1):43–45 |
| [19] | Wang YJ (1990) Solving mine ventilation networks with fixed and non-fixed branches. Min Eng 42(12):1342–1346 |
| [20] | Wang YJ, Hartman HL, Mutmansky JM (1985) Recent developments in mine ventilation network theory and analysis. In: Balkema AA (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd mine ventilation symposium, Rotterdam |
| [21] | Wu X (1991) Optimization of control device location and sizes in mine ventilation systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg |
| [22] | Wu ZL, Li HS (1993) Simulation of mine ventilation under the influence of mine fires. In: Proceedings of the US mine ventilation symposium, University of Utah, pp 359–363, June 21–23 |
| [23] | Wu X, Topuz E (1987) The determination of booster fan location in underground mines. In: Mutmansky JM (ed) Proceedings of 3rd Mine Ventilation Symposium, Littleton, pp 401–407 |
18 March 2015
28 July 2015
03 August 2015
December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-015-0094-x
Springer
