Owned by: China Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by: China Coal Society
Published by: Springer Nature
About issue

The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal. It focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development, serving as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues.


Coverage includes original research articles, new developments, case studies and critical reviews in all aspects of scientific and engineering research on coal, coal utilizations and coal mining. Among the broad topics receiving attention are coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology; coal mining theory, technology and engineering; coal processing, utilization and conversion; coal mining environment and reclamation and related aspects.


The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs so authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.


The journal operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous.


  • A forum for new research findings, case studies and discussion of important challenges in coal science and mining development

  • Offers an international perspective on coal geology, coal mining, technology and engineering, coal processing, utilization and conversion, coal mining environment and reclamation and more

  • Published with the China Coal Society

Show More
Editors-in-Chief
Suping Peng, Shimin Liu
Managing Editor
Wanjie Wang
Associate Editors
Bo Hyun Kim, Dongjie Xue, Pedram Roghanchi, Wu Xiao, Zhiqiang Wu
Publishing model
Open Access. Learn about publishing OA with us
Home > Volumes and issues > Volume 3, issue 6

Petrographic characterization and evolution of the Karharbari coals, Talcher Coalfield, Orissa, India

Research Article

Open Access

Published: 18 June 2016

0 Accesses

International Journal of Coal Science & Technology Volume 3, 133-147, (2016)

Abstract

In the present study an attempt has been made to carry out the detailed petrographic characterization of the Karharbari coals of Talcher coalfield and to reconstruct the paleoenvironment conditions of coal formation using macerals and microlithtotypes as a tool. For these purposes a large number of samples were collected following the pillar sampling method and were subjected to detailed petrographic study. The petrographic observation shows that these coals are vitrinite rich followed by the liptinite and inertinite group of macerals. On microlithotype scale, these coals shows the dominance of the vitrite followed by clarite, vitrinertite and inertite. The concentration of liptite, clarodurite, duroclarite and vitrinertoliptite are insignificant. The vitrinite reflectance ranks the Karharbari coal as high volatile bituminous ‘C’ to high volatile ‘B’ bituminous. Coal petrography based depositional models suggest peat accumulation in forested telmatic swamp. Moreover, during the time of their evolution, there were alternate phases of oxic and anoxic moor conditions with good tissue preservation.

1.Introduction

The Gondwana coals of India are developed mainly along the two sides of a great triangular area whose third side is formed by the northern part of the east coast of Indian peninsula (Fig. 1a). Damodar, Son and Narmada Valleys make the north side of the triangle, whereas the southwestern side runs along to Godavari–Wardha Valley and subsidiary belt run along to Mahanadi Valley (Fig. 1a). The Talcher coalfield is the southeastern part of the Mahanadi Graben. It is detached basin surrounded by Precambrian rocks and occupies an area of over 1800 sq. km. in the Dhenkanal district of Orissa with a small segment lying in the adjoining Sambalpur district.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Location map of Gondwana coal-fields of India. b Geological map of Talcher coalfield, Mahanadi valley, Orissa (Raja Rao 1982)

The first report on the occurrence of coal from this area dates back to 1937. The first systematic survey of the area was carried out by Blanford et al. (1856). Brief accounts of the geology, structure and coal seams of the basin have been given by Fox (1934), Pascoe (1959), Subramanian (1971), Das and Rath (1974) and Raja Rao (1982). Due to huge coal resources, the basin has attracted the attention of various exploring agencies. As a result the, the Indian Bureau of Mines, the Geological Survey of India, the Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, and the Directorate of Geology, Government of Orissa, initiated the exploration activities in the Talcher coalfield. In the year 1963–1965, Geological Survey of India conducted regional exploration in the coalfield. Presently the Talcher coalfield is exploited by Mahanadi Coalfield Limited, a subsidiary of Coal India Limited. Talcher basin is mainly studied by stratigraphers, sedimentologists and paleontologists, but petrological and geochemical aspects of Talcher coal, however, have not been taken into account so far. Although few reports have been published on the petrographic and geochemical characteristics of Talcher coals based on sporadic samples, the earlier studies lack the systematic sampling, regional approach and modern techniques. A mention may be the works of Das (1959), Navale (1965, 1966, 1971), Pareek (1955, 1956, 1958, 1963a, b), and Mishra et al. (1998) and Mohanty et al. (2001).

In the Talcher coalfield, coal seams have been reported in the Karharbari and the Barakar formation. In the present study an effort has been made to carry out a detailed petrographic and geochemical study of a large number of coal samples from the Karharbari Formation of the Talcher coalfield aiming to discuss the depositional conditions during accumulation.

2.Geology of the area

The rough outline of the coalfield resembles that of an ellipse. It is flat type of the basin and is bounded on all sides by Archeans. The Gondwana sediments of the investigated area represent a fairly continuous succession of strata comprising a Talcher and Damuda Groups. The sediment rest unconformably on the Precambrian basement comprising granites, gneisses, phyllites and amphibolites (Table 1).

Table 1 Stratigraphic sequence of Talcher coalfield (Raja Rao 1982)

Age

Formation and lithology

Recent

Alluvium and laterite

Upper Permian–Triassic

Kamthi

Fine to medium grained sandstone, carbonaceous shale, coal bands with greenish sandstone, pink clays and pebbly sandstones at top (250 m+)

Lower Permian

Barakar

Medium to coarse grained sandstones, shales, coal seams with oligomictic conglomerate at base (500 m+)

Lower Permian

Karharbari

Medium to coarse grained sandstones, shales and coal seam (270 m)

Lower Permian

Diamictite, fine to medium grained greenish sandstones, shale, rhythmite, turbidite etc. (170 m+)

Unconformity

 Precambrian

Granite, gneisses, amphibolites, migmatites etc.

The Precambrian comprises a low ridge and isolated hillock along the boundaries of the basin. In Talcher coalfield, base of Gondwana sediments is marked by a pile of glacial and preglacial deposits. They were originally recognized by Blanford et al. (1856) and have been named Talchir Formation after the type locality. These rocks are well exposed along the southern boundary of the basin. This formation comprises diamictites, sandstone, needle shale, turbidites, rhythmites and varves (Table 1). The Talchir Formation conformably overlain by the Karharbari Formation, which is exposed as a narrow strip both along the southern and northern margins of the basin. Here, the Karharbari Formation has distinct lithological and palynological entity. This formation mainly consists of medium to coarse grained sandstone and shale. It also contains the superior quality of coal seam (Fig. 1b). Karharbari Formation is overlain by Barakar Formation, which characterized by a thick and conspicuous conglomerate horizon at the base. The conglomerate is oligomictic in nature and contains well round quartz and quartzite clast of various sizes. The basal conglomerate unit is overlain by a thick sequence (more than 500 m thick.) medium to coarse grained greyish feldspathic sandstone, grey to dark grey shale. The Barakar Formation conformably overlain by a sequence characterized by fine to medium grained, light grey and ferruginous sandstones and shale at the base and a thick succession of pale greenish sandstone with rare shale and pink clay bands, ferruginous coarse grained and pebbly sandstone at the top (Table 1). The formation is designated as Supra Barakar Formation.

3.Method of study

During the present study, coal samples were collected from Derra underground coal mines following the pillar coal sampling method. Coal samples were collected from Karharbari Top seam and Karharbari Bottom seam. Their megascopic characterization was performed by using the scheme proposed by Diessel (1965) and macroscopic seam profiles were constructed. For the microscopic study coal samples were crushed to 18 mesh size (<1 mm size particles). The polished particulate coal mounts were prepared by using cold mounting epoxy resin without pressure. The study was carried out on an advanced petrological microscope equipped with MSP 200 photometry system and fluorescence attachment. The maceral nomenclature applied, followed the ICCP system (1971, 1998, 2001). For the microlithotype analysis, a 20 point Kötter graticule was used. The line to line and point to point distance was maintained 0.4 mm for both maceral and microlithotype analysis. The maceral and microlithotype counting was done simultaneously. The reflectance measurement was carried out as per the ISO standard (ISO 7404-5 1994). For the precise assessment of liptinite and dark vitrinite microscopic examination of macerals was carried out both under the white incident light as well as under blue light excitation. The International Committees for coal Petrology (1971) devised certain rules for the characterization of maceral association. According to which, the minimum dimension of a band to be called a microlithotype, should be 50 × 50 mm, and the 5 % rule. The 5 % rule demonstrates that a microlithotype can have 5 % accessory macerals due to the very fact that neither the monomaceral nor the bimaceral microlithotypes are constituted exclusively of the macerals of one group or two groups respectively. Therefore, they can have 5 % accessory macerals which will have no role in their nomenclature or characterization. ICCP recommendation has been followed during the characterization of microlithotype. All the coal samples were subjected to proximate (BIS 2003) and petrographic analysis.

4.Results

4.1 Macropetrographic characteristics of coal

These coals are banded in nature with vitrain and clarain being the dominant lithotypes. Durain has also been observed only in few coal samples and fusian has also been recorded. In some of the coal samples, pyrite framboids and small nodules have also been found. The scheme proposed by Diessel (1965) for the megascopic characterization of banded coals has been followed in the construction of megascopic seam profiles of Karharbari coals.

In the Karharbari formation, only bright coal, banded bright coal and banded coals have been recorded (Fig. 4).

4.2 Petrographic characteristics of coal

4.2.1 Rank

For the determination of rank of the Karharbari coals, the parameters used are volatile matter (d.a.f. basis) and vitrinite reflectance (Ro mean) value. In the Karharbari coals, the volatile matter (d.a.f. basis) ranges from 35.2 to 45.9 %, mean 43.1 % (Table 2) and reflectance of vitrinite (Ro mean) ranges from 0.57 % to 0.69 %, mean 0.59 % (Table 3; Fig. 4). The volatile matter and Ro mean values suggest these coals to range in rank from high volatile bituminous ‘C’ to ‘B’.

Table 2 Proximate constituents (wt%) of Karharbari coals of Talcher coalfield, Orissa

Proximate constituents

Top seam

Bottom seam

Range

Mean

Range

Mean

Dry basis

 Moisture

7.0–8.0

7.9

8.0–10.5

9.0

 Ash

10.0–20.0

13.7

5.0–11.3

8.7

 Volatile matter

25.5–37.3

33.4

34.1–36.6

35.9

 Fixed carbon

39.0–48.5

44.9

43.5–49.5

43.6

Dry ash free basis

 Volatile matter

35.2–45.9

42.6

41.10–45.8

43.6

 Fixed carbon

54.2–64.8

57.4

54.21–58.9

56.4

Table 3 Reflectance measurement of Karharbari coals of Talcher coalfield, Orissa

Reflectance values

Top seam

Bottom seam

Range

Mean

Range

Mean

Minimum

0.39–0.46

0.4

0.33–0.44

0.37

Mean

0.57–0.69

0.59

0.57–0.61

0.59

Maximum

0.62–0.92

0.81

0.66–0.85

0.78

Standard deviation

0.06–0.11

0.08

0.06–0.09

0.08

4.2.2 Maceral composition

All the three group macerals viz. vitrinite, liptinite and inertinite have been recorded. Among the three macerals groups, vitrinite is the most dominant. The macerals of liptinite group have also occurred at moderate concentration, whereas macerals of inertinite group are low in concentration as compared to others two groups.

4.2.2.1 Vitrinite group

All the maceral and sub-macerals of vitrinite group have been recorded in these coals. Telovitrinite in general, is the dominant subgroup. Among the telovitrinite subgroup, the concentration of telinite is quite poor while collotelinite occurs at high concentration and dominating over all the macerals of the vitrinite group. Generally it occurs as a thick band (Fig. 2b, c, h). The colour of collotelinite varies from light grey to dark grey. The cavities or cell lumens of the telinite is either filled with collotelinite or mineral matter. After the telovitrinite, the next dominating subgroup is detrovitrinite and represented by vitrodetrinite and collodetrinite (Fig. 2d, h). In the Karharbari coal beyond the collotelinite, next dominating maceral of the vitrinite group is vitrodetrinite. If vitrinite occurs as ground mass (mottled in appearance) of clarite and trimacerite with a colour darker and reflectance lower than the normal collotelinite in the same coal then such maceral is known collodetrinite. Gelovitrinite subgroup is represented by corpogelinite and gelinite. Corpogelinite is characterized by its typical oval to subrounded shape. In occurs occurs mostly as oval bodies as large isolated grains (Fig. 2a), in the form of cluster and also as cell fillings arranged in a definite pattern. The colour has been found to be paler and the reflectance is higher than the associated collotelinite. Gelinite occur as cell and fissure fillings. The colour of this maceral is slightly brighter and reflectance is comparatively higher than that of other vitrinite macerals in the same coal. Pseudovitrinite (more commonly called semi-vitrinite in India) is also present in these coals being characterized by its higher reflectance as compared to the normal collotelinite in the same coal and considered to be a transition stage between vitrinite and semi-fusinite. Some of vitrinite-bands of these coals have shown the fluorescence properties which are low reflecting and comparatively darker grey in colour. Such vitrinite is known as dark vitrinite. The fluorescence of vitrinite has been understood to be due to the presence of adsorped petroleum like substance, generated during the coalification process from liptinite and lipoid substance occurring in association of vitrinite (Teichmüller 1982a, b; Teichmuller and Durand 1983). Oxidation cracks are also recorded in few coals samples and cracks are in places filled with mineral matter (either argillaceous or sulphides). The quantitative distribution of vitrinite group of macerals of the Karharbari coals is given in the Table 4.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Photomicrograph under white incident light. a Carpogelinite, b band of collotelinite, inertodetrinite and carbonate mineral matter, c thick band of collotelinite and secretinite, d sporinite in the ground mass of collotelinite, e collotelinite, semifusinite, resinite and inertodetrinite, f fusinite, g macrinite, funfinite, h collotelinite, vitrodetrinite, inertodetrinite, argillaceous and carbonate mineral matter

Table 4 Maceral and mineral matter composition of Karharbari coals of Talcher coalfield, Orissa

Maceral and mineral matter

Top seam

Bottom seam

Range

Mean

Range

Mean

Vitrinite

30.1–51.4 (43.9–62.6)*

39.8 (53.8)

31.6–55.8 (52.4–69.5)

45.5 (61.9)

 Telinite

Nil–1.5 (Nil–1.8)

0.33 (0.4)

Nil–2.3 (Nil–3.6)

0.62 (0.9)

 Collotelinite

15.2–44.9 (25.0–54.8)

28.4 (37.8)

26.2–51.0 (48.4–63.4)

40.5 (55.1)

 Vitrodetrinite

1.5–13.4 (1.83–22.1)

6.2 (8.8)

0.31–1.5(0.4–2.4)

1.07 (1.4)

 Collodetrinite

Nil–1.4 (Nil–1.0)

0.59 (0.8)

0.3–1.2 (0.4–1.4)

0.6 (0.8)

 Corpogelinite

0.4–2.3 (0.6–2.8)

1.14 (1.6)

0.4–1.7 (0.4–1.9)

0.79 (1.0)

 Gelinite

Nil–0.8 (Nil–1.0)

0.4 (0.5)

Nil–0.8 (Nil–1.2)

0.3 (0.4)

 Dark vitrinite

Nil–2.3 (Nil–3.0)

0.6 (0.8)

0.4–1.0 (0.6–1.3)

0.7 (0.9)

 Pseudovitrinite

0.8–4.6 (1.0–5.5)

2.1 (2.8)

0.4–2.1 (0.4–2.4)

1.2 (1.5)

Liptinite

17.9–29.3 (26.7–43.2)

23.5 (31.9)

11.6–29.1 (16.2–35.1)

22.2 (27.2)

 Sporinite

6.2–11.5 (8.2–15.0)

8.7(11.9)

2.9–11.2 (3.7–14)

6.6 (8.3)

 Cutinite

0.5–2.5 (0.7–3.1)

1.3 (1.7)

Nil–1.5 (Nil–1.2)

0.7 (0.8)

 Resinite

Nil–1.1 (Nil–1.5)

0.5 (0.7)

Nil–0.2 (Nil–0.2)

0.02 (0.02)

 Alginite

Nil–0.6 (Nil–0.5)

0.1 (0.2)

Nil–0.7 (Nil–0.9)

0.2 (0.3)

 Liptodetrinite

1.4–5.4 (2.3–6.9)

3.1 (4.1)

1.0–3.5 (1.5–4.8)

2.6 (3.2)

 Fluorinite

0.7–2.1 (0.8–2.6)

1.1 (1.5)

0.6–3.1 (0.9–4.0)

1.6 (2.1)

 Exsudatinite

1.2–6.5 (1.7–11.9)

3.8 (5.2)

3.5–7.4 (3.9–9.6)

5.2 (6.6)

 Bituminite

0.2–2.1 (0.3–2.6)

0.9 (1.2)

0.2–2.7 (0.3–3.1)

1.2 (1.5)

 Degraded pollen

0.4–5.83(0.6–7.7)

3.0 (4.1)

1.5–5.2 (2.0–6.6)

3.8 (4.8)

 Pollen sac

Nil–1.8 (Nil–3.1)

0.9 (1.3)

Nil–1.4 (Nil–1.8)

0.5 (0.6)

Inertinite

5.55–17.2 (6.8–20.7)

10.6 (14.3)

4.5–13.1(5.8–20.6)

8.7 (11.1)

 Micrinite

Nil–0.2 (Nil–0.3)

0.02 (0.03)

Nil–0.2 (Nil–0.2)

0.02 (0.03)

 Macrinite

Nil–0.4 (Nil–0.4)

0.1 (0.2)

Nil

Nil

 Semifusinite

Nil–4.9 (Nil–6.4)

2.5 (3.2)

0.9–3.5 (1.2–4.8)

2.4 (3.0)

 Fusinite

0.9–8.4 (1.4–10.1)

3.6 (4.9)

0.9–3.1 (1.2–4.9)

2.38 (3.0)

 Secretinite

Nil–2.8 (Nil–3.5)

1.0 (1.4)

0.7–4.0 (0.9–4.8)

1.8 (2.2)

 Inertodetrinite

0.7–4.7 (0.9–8.4)

3.28 (4.5)

Nil–5.4 (Nil–8.5)

2.1 (2.8)

Mineral matter

16.63–39.11

26.21

15.16–39.21

20.43

 Argillaceous mineral matter

14.3–34.5

21.81

10.1–30.1

17.4

 Carbonate mineral matter

1.4–6.4

3.1

0.5–3.9

1.8

 Sulphide mineral matter

Nil–4.2

1.3

0.7–3.1

1.3

4.2.2.2 Liptinite group

In the Karharbari coals both primary (structured) and secondary liptinite (unstructured) liptinite macerals have been observed. In these coals, primary liptinite macerals are represented by sporinite, cutinite, resinite, alginite and liptodetrinite whereas secondary liptinitic macerals are represented by fluorinite, exsudatinite and bituminite. Degraded pollen and pollen sacs have also been recorded in the Karharbari coals and counted separately. Among the liptinite group the most dominating maceral is sporinite. In the Karharbari coals, both microspores (microsporinite) and megaspores (megasporinite) have been identified (Fig. 3a–c). The colour of the spores is dark grey to brown under white incident light (Fig. 3d) while in fluorescent mode, the colour of the spores is yellow, turmeric yellow, orange-brown and brown colour (Fig. 3a–d, h). In the megaspore suture lines are quite distinct. The colour of cutinite is similar to sporinite dark grey to grey, but in some places it is paler than the associated sporinite. Thin walled cutinite has been identified in these coals. Resinite is also observed in the Karharbari coals and generally being oval to round in shape (Fig. 3a). In some samples, a thick band of weathered resinite has also been recorded. Resinite is more common in the Karharbari top seam as compared to bottom seam. In few samples of the Karharbari coals, alginites is also identified (Fig. 3e). It indicates the marine incursion during the deposition of coals. The alginite can hardly be identified under white incident light. However, it can be better studied in blue irradiation where it shows green, yellow and yellowish- brown colours depending upon the rank of coal. Its fan shaped morphology indicates the pila type of alginite present in the Karharbari coals. Occurrence of acritarch and and ichnofossils have also indicated the marine signature in the basin (Tiwari et al. 1995; Goswami, 2002). Secondary liptinite macerals (unstructured liptinite) have identified at higher concentration indicating that these coals can act as a source rock for the hydrocarbon generation. To support these observations geochemical data are very much essential. Bituminite appears as amorphous, as well as lamellar forms without any definite shape and size occurring as finely dispersed lenses streaks and at places as groundmass for other liptinite maceral (Fig. 3e, h). It shows characteristic orange or brown colour under fluorescence light. Exsudatinite occurs as a crack or fissure fillings in collotelinite and shows black colour under white reflected light and s orange and brownish orange under blue irradiation fluorescence (Fig. 3g). Fluorinite is very common in these coals (Fig. 3h). It is seen as black colour, elongated or lensoid bodies of variable thickness under the white reflected light. Under the blue excitation, it is greenish yellow to yellow. Liptodetrinite is frequently occurring in these coals (Fig. 3a, d, f, g). The quantitative distribution of liptinite group of macerals of the Karharbari coals is given in the Table 4 and Fig. 4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Photomicrograph of liptinite macerals under fluorescent light. a spores, small resin bodies and liptodetrinite, b sporinite and degraded pollen (DP), c megaspore (S), d fluorinite (F) and spore, e aliginite (A) and amorphous bituminite, f fluorinite, liptodetrinite and spores, g exsudatinite (E) and sporangium (SG), h amorphous bituminite (B), liptodetrinite and spores

Fig. 4
figure 4

Macropetrographic section and microscopic seam (maceral and microlithotype) and range of mean vitrinite reflectance (in oil) of Karharbari coals Talcher coal field, Mahanadi valley, Orissa

4.2.2.3 Inertinite group

Inertinite macerals have the same precursors as vitrinite macerals and many of them pass through the same stages of humification except that, before reaching depositional base level below the groundwater table, they are subjected to a period of intensive desiccation and varying degrees of oxidation including partial burning of the accumulated vegetal matter (Gould and Shibaoka 1980). The results are coal constituents which possess relatively high O/C ratios and high reflectance in incident light microscopy because they are rich in aromatic carbon. Most inertinite macerals are relatively brittle and hard, which in incident light microscopy is shown by their tendency to develop polishing relief. Inertinite includes a group of maceral which are characterized by their white to yellowish white colour and high reflectance.

In the coal of Karharbari Formation inertinite occurs at low concentration as compared to the macerals of vitrinite and liptinite groups. All the macerals of this group occur in these coals with significant dominance of fusinite and semifusinite. The macerals of this group include micrinite, macrinite, semifusinite, fusinite, sclerotinite and inertodetrinite.

Fusinite is characterized by a well preserved cellular structure where cell lumens may be open or occupied by mineral matter (carbonate, pyrite and clay) (Fig. 2f). Bogen and sieve structures have also been observed in fusinite. Under white incident light the colour of fusinite is white to yellowish white with high relief and very high reflectance. Both pyrofusinite and degrado fusinite have been recorded. After the fusinite, next dominating maceral of the inertinite group is semifusinite (Fig. 2e). The cell structure of semifusinite is not so well preserved as in the case of fusinite. Its colour lies between light grey to white. In some places, transition from collotelinite to semifusinite has also been observed during the petrographic study. Figure 2e shows the sharp boundary between collotelinite and semifusinite. Marionette has also been observed in these cells. It occurs as rounded to oval bodies. (Figure 2g). The colour is white and reflectance is high close to this fusninte in the same coal. Micrinite has been observed in these coals and it occurs in the form of lenses. It shows white colour and high reflectance. Secretinite has also been recorded in these coals (Fig. 2c). Inertodetrinite is observed only in these coals and it appears to have been derived from crushing of fusinite and semifusinite (Fig. 2c, g, h). The quantitative distribution of inertinite group of macerals of the Karharbari coals is given in the Table 4 and Fig. 4.

4.2.3 Mineral matter

The minerals present in these coals includes clay, carbonate, and sulphides. The clay minerals occur as ground mass and also as discrete form, fissure, crack, and cleat fillings and as a infilling of cell lumens of telinite and mainly detrital in orgin. Sulfide occurs in the form of pyrite as disseminated pyrite, discrete grains and infillings of fissures and cracks. Pyrite particles of <1 mm size have been identified as disseminated or submicron pyrite. In the coals it occurs mostly as sporadically distributed particles in the organic ground mass. This form of pyrite originates during hummification process and thus characterized genetically as syngenetic (Reyes-Navarro and Davis 1976; Renton 1979). The discrete grain of pyrite is characterized as a epigenetic origin, which comes into being through ingress of ferruginous solutions at the later stages of coal formation, particularly after partial compaction (Neavel 1966). Fissure and crack filling form of the pyrites are very common in these coals and occurrence of these pyrite forms are described to be of epigenetic origin (Renton, 1979). In one or two samples, framboidal pyrite has also been observed. Although mechanism of the development of framboid is yet to be understood; Kizilstein and Trufanov (1968), Kizilstein and Minaeva (1972), Skripchenko and Berberian (1975), and Reyes-Navarro and Davis (1976) have shown that this type of pyrite is produced by bacteria in anaerobic settings and which may be considered as marine signature. The carbonates occur as ground mass, as strings and also as a cavity and fissure fillings. At few places it has impregnated over the macerals. Carbonate minerals are mainly syngenetic in origin. The concentration of different type of mineral matters in the Karharbari coals is given in the Table 4 and Fig. 4.

4.2.4 Microlithotype and carbominerite

Among microlithotype group, the most dominating is monomaceral followed by bimaceral and trimaceral. The microlithotype analysis shows the dominance of vitrite, clarite, vitrinertite and inertite. Monomaceral microlithotype group is represented by the vitrite, liptite and inertite whereas bimaceral microlithotype group is represented by the clarite and vitrinertite. Trimaceral group has been seen only a few samples. The mineral matter has also been identified in terms of carbominerites. The carbominerite has been characterized as carbargilite, carbankerite, carbopyrite and carbopolyminerite (Mackowsky 1982). The most dominating carbominerite in the Karharbari coals is the carbargillite and which followed by the carbankerite, carbopyrite and carbopolyminerite. The concentration range of the different microlithtypes is given in the Table 5 and Fig. 4.

Table 5 Microlithotype and carbominerite composition of Karharbari coals of Talcher coalfield, Orissa

Microlithotype & carbominerite

Top Seam

Bottom Seam

Range

Mean

Range

Mean

Monomaceral

 Vitrite

7.4–65.6 (41.7–75.8)*

41.7 (59.5)

43.7–76.5 (59.2–89.1)

58.1 (70.7)

 Liptite

Nil–3.7 (Nil–4.4)

0.9 (1.6)

Nil–1.0 (Nil–1.3)

0.3 (0.3)

 Inertite

Nil–18.5 (Nil–16.7)

7.5 (10.4)

3.4–11.7 (2.3–13.6)

6.7 (8.2)

Bimaceral

 Clarite

3.7–15.1 (5.5–26.1)

9.3 (14.2)

4.9–17.0 (6.3–21.6)

10.7 (13.4)

 Vitrinertite

4.1–14.8 (5.3–28.6)

8.6 (13.7)

1.2–11.7 (1.6–15.8)

5.1 (6.6)

Trimaceral

 Duroclarite

Nil–1.5 (Nil–1.8)

0.4 (0.6)

Nil–1.1 (Nil–1.4)

0.4 (0.5)

 Clarodurite

Nil

Nil

Nil–1.1 (Nil–1.4)

0.2 (0.3)

 Vitrinertoliptite

Nil

Nil

Nil–1.1 (Nil–1.4)

0.2 (0.3)

Carbominerite

 Carbargilite

5.5–35.4

22.6

4.8–19.4

12.6

 Carbankerite

1.4–10.4

3.6

0.4–1.9

1.2

 Carbopyrite

Nil–5.3

2.1

0.6–3.9

1.9

 Carbopolyminerite

Nil–10.5

4.3

0.8–7.7

2.7

5.Discussions

Advancement of coal petrographic techniques offers extended parameters which can retrieve the archived records of the evolutionary path of coals. The qualitative and quantitative occurrence of microscopic codes which are to be decoded to interpret the nature and type of plant community, depositional milieu, dynamics of surface and underground waters, paleogeography and paleoclimate of a coal deposit. The coal petrologists who have significant contribution in this field are: Krausel (1961), Cohen and Spackman (1972), Smyth (1979, 1980, 1984); Teichmüller and Teichmüller (1975); Teichmuller and Teichmuller (1982); Styan and Bustin (1983), Harvey and Dillon (1985), Diessel (1986), Cohen et al. (1987), Hunt (1989), Hunt and Smyth (1989), Calder et al. (1991), Grady et al. (1993), Shearer and Clarkson (1998), Hawke et al. (1999), Duan et al. (2011), Deng and Sun (2011), Lin and Tian (2011), Singh and Singh (1996, 2000), Singh et al. (2010a, b, 2012a, b, 2013) and Suárez-Ruiz et al. (2012).

Coal facies is a function of the type of peat forming flora. The flora in a given geological milieu are controlled by climate, ground water table, nutrient supply and chemistry of water (marine influence). The ground water is the most important factor which determines not only the type of vegetation but also controls the redox potential (oxic to anoxic) and thereby the mode of preservation of plant litter or intensity of humification process. A peat accumulating system can be distinguished in coastal lowland and freshwater peat land (Diessel 1992). The coastal low land is protected by sand bars or barrier beaches, close to tidal influences and grade into marine-influenced to freshwater mires. The fresh water peatlands are inland mire, having no connection to sea, including upper delta and alluvial plain swamps, marshes and bogs. Peat may form in forest swamps from various plant associations, or in marshes with herbaceous vegetation (sedges and grasses) or in open swamps with predominantly submerged and floating plants or in raised bog with mosses or shrubs or trees. Several coal geologists made significant contributions towards the depositional system, mention may be the name of Amijaya and Littke (2005), Marques (2002), Sebag et al. (2006), and Silva et al. (2008). For retrieving the type of Karharbari coal facies, petrography based model proposed by Hacquebard and Donaldson (1969), Diessel (1986), Calder et al. (1991), Mukhopadhyay (1986), Singh and Singh (1996) and Singh et al. (2013) have been used.

The microlithotype composition of the Karharbari coal in a facies model proposed by Hacquebard and Donaldson (1969) suggests that this coals was evolved from the forest mire (Fig. 5). Hacquebard and Donaldson (1969) have shown that the quality and quantity of flora are controlled by water depth conditions of the peat mires, which also regulates the mode of preservation and thereby quantitative distribution of macerals and microlithotypes. Therefore, the microlithotype composition of Karharbari coal suggests the evolution of these coals via forest moors. In order to substantiate the above contemplation a facies model designed by Diessel (1986) has been tested for these coals. Diessel has formulated two parameters—gelification index (GI) and tissue preservation index (PI), for retrieving the paleofacies and has interpreted the depositional setting based on these GI and TPI index have been calculated according to the given formulae:

$${\text{GI}} = \frac{{{\text{Vitrinite }} + {\text{ Macrinite}}}}{{{\text{Semifusinite }} + {\text{ Fusinite }} + {\text{ Inertodetrinite}}}}$$
$${\text{TPI}} = \frac{{{\text{Telinite }} + {\text{ Collotelinite }} + {\text{ Semifusinite }} + {\text{ Fusinite}}}}{{{\text{Collodetrinite }} + {\text{ Macrinite }} + {\text{ Inertodetrinite}}}}$$
Fig. 5
figure 5

Microlithotype composition of Karharbari coals plotted on a facies diagram proposed by Hacquebard and Donaldson (1969) and modified by Marchionni (1980)

This model was further addressed by Lamberson et al. (1991), Alkonde et al. (1992) and Diessel (1992). The TPI is the measure of the degree of tissue decomposition and the ratio of the woody plants in the original peat forming plant congregation. Further, the ratio of tissue-derived structured macerals versus tissue-derived unstructured macerals is a scale to quantify the degree of humification suffered by maceral precursor and also to measure the proportion of wood matter contributed to the gamut of peat. In addition, low TPI gives two different clues either the dominance of herbaceous plants in the swamp or an intense humification process leading to extensive destruction of plant tissues (Diessel 1992). On the other hand, high TPI suggests the presence of well-preserved plant tissue (telinite, fusinite and semifusinite), a high proportion of arboreal vegetation (telinite, collotelinite, fusinite and semifusinite) and aerobic condition.

The GI scales the intensity and time of wet condition (Diessel 1992). It decreases with the increase of oxidation. Further, a high GI and TPI point to a meagre aerobic decomposition (Lamberson et al. 1991). In case of Karharbari coal, the GI and TPI values are moderately high. The GI and TPI values of Karharbari coal in this model (Fig. 6) indicates that these coals have evolved under telmatic conditions and wet forest swamp.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Coal facies deciphered from gelification index (GI) and tissue preparation index (TPI) in relation to depositional setting and type of mire for Karharbari coals, Mahanadi valley, Orissa (after Diessel 1986 and modified by Kalkreuth et al. 1991). LI limited influx, O MARSH open marsh, VIT vitrinite, INERT inertinite, SEMIFUS semifusinite, FUS fusinite, IDET inertoderinite, STRUCT structured, DEG degraded

A facies model of Calder et al. (1991) is also used, which is based on the ground water index (GWI) and vegetation index (VI). In fact, this model is very similar to GI and TPI indices of Diessel (1986). The parameters used in the reconstruction of peat lands are the degree of ground water influence, relative rainfall (Kalkreuth et al. 1991; Ligouis and Doubinger 1991), changes in ground water level in the mire (Peatland = marsh + swamp), vegetation, mineral matter content and degree of preservation of maceral precursor (Calder et al. 1991). The GWI and VI are calculated as under:

$${\text{GWI}} = \frac{{{\text{Gelinite}} + {\text{Corpogelinite}} + {\text{Clay mineral}} + {\text{quartz}} + {\text{Vitrodetrinite}}}}{{{\text{Telinite }} + {\text{ Collotelinite }} + {\text{ Collodterinite}}}}$$
$${\text{VI}} = \frac{{{\text{Telinite }} + {\text{ Collotelinite}} + {\text{ Fusinite }} + {\text{ Semifusinite }} + {\text{ Suberinite }} + {\text{ Resinite}}}}{{{\text{Collodterinite }} + {\text{Inertodetrinite}} + {\text{Alginite}} + {\text{Liptodetrinite}} + {\text{Sporinite}} + {\text{Cutinite}}}}$$

Based on GWI and VI index, Calder et al. (1991) retrieved major mire paleoenvironments- such as limnic (open water marsh), swamp, fen and bog (Fig. 7) representing rheotrophic and ombrotrophic hydrological conditions. The GWI and VI values of Karharbari coals suggest the deposition of peat in swamp forest, mostly under rheotrophic to mesobrotrophic hydrological conditions, but few plots also lying in the ombrotrophic zone (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Karharbari coals, Talcher coalfield, Mahanadi valley, Orissa, GWI versus VI Paleoenvironment diagram (modified after Calder et al. 1991)

A facies model proposed by Mukhopadhyay (1986) has also been used for the Karharbari coals based on the maceral composition. In this model (Fig. 8), plots of Karharbari coals indicate again their origin by forest swamp under mildly oxic to anoxic conditions with good tissue preservation.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Ternary diagram illustrating facies critical maceral association in Karharbari coals, Talcher coalfields, Mahanadi valley, Orissa and suggested peat forming environment (modified from Mukhopadhyay 1986)

A facies model proposed by Singh and Singh (1996) has been applied which is based on the maceral and mineral matter content. In this model more emphasis has been given in the quantitative occurrence of mineral matter in coal because it directly relates to the influx of surface water cover in swamps. The plots of Karharbari coal in this model suggest that these coals was deposited in alternating oxic and anoxic mire (Fig. 9) It is indicative of fluctuating water cover in the basin.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Depositional conditions of coals based on maceral and mineral matter content (after Singh and Singh 1996)

Yet another facies model based on Microlithotype has also been used (Singh et al. 2013) to infer the paleodepositional conditions of coals. Three parameters (A, B and C) have been taken into considerations which are as under:

$${\text{A }} = {\text{ Liptite }} + {\text{ Clarite }}\left( {\text{L}} \right) \, + {\text{ Vitrinertoliptite }} + {\text{ Durite }}\left( {\text{L}} \right)$$
$${\text{B }} = {\text{ Vitrite }} + {\text{ Clarite}}\left( {\text{V}} \right) \, + {\text{ Vitrinertite }}\left( {\text{V}} \right) \, + {\text{ Duroclarite}}$$
$${\text{C }} = {\text{ Inertite }} + {\text{ Durite }}\left( {\text{I}} \right) \, + {\text{ Clarodurite }} + {\text{ Vitrinertite }}\left( {\text{I}} \right)$$

The types of facies delineated are:

CF1:

Deep water facies, characterized by organic mud, rich in liptinites

CF2:

Open water with dominance of subaquatic plants

CF3:

Forest swamp with sudden eustatic changes

CF4:

Forest to reed swamp

CF5:

Forest swamp

CF6:

Moss swamp with extremely dry conditions

The plots of Karharbari coal, on this model, suggest the development of forest facies (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Coal facies based on microlithotype composition of Karharbari coals form the Talcher coalfields, Mahanadi valley Orissa, CF1 deep water facies characterized by organic mud rich liptinite, CF2 open water with dominance of sub aquatic plants, CF3 forest swam with sudden eustatic change, CR4 forest reed swamp, CF5 forest swamp, CF6 mass swamp with extremely dry conditions (Singh et al. 2013)

6.Conclusions

Petrographic study of the Karharbari coal shows that these coals are vitrinite rich, followed by liptinite and inertinite. Secondary liptinite macerals are observed in significant amount. The microlithotype analysis shows the dominance of vitrite followed by vitrinertite, clarite and inertite. The vitrinite reflectance (Ro) and volatile matter (d.a.f) values rank the Karharbari coal as high volatile bituminous ‘C’ to ‘B’. The microscopic constituents of Karharbari coal indicate peat accumulation in the forest mire under fluctuating oxic to anoxic conditions with good tissue preservation.

References

[1] Alkonde SO, Hoffknecht A, Erdtmann BD (1992) Rank and petrographic composition of selected Upper Cretaceous and Tertiary coals of Southern Nigeria. Int J Coal Geol 20:209–224
[2] Amijaya H, Littke R (2005) Microfacies and depositional environment of Tertiary Tanjung Enim low rank coal, South Sumatra basin, Indonesia. Int J Coal Geol 61:197–221
[3] BIS (2003) Methods of test for coal and coke (2nd revision of IS: 1350). Part I, Proximate analysis. Bureau of Indian Standard, pp. 1–29
[4] Blanford WT, Blanford HF, Theobald T (1856) On the geological structure and relations of Talcher coalfield in the district of Cuttuck. Mem Geo Survey India 1:1–98
[5] Calder JH, Gibbing MR, Mukhopadhay PK (1991) Peat formation in a Westphalian B piedmont setting, Cumberland Basin, Nova Scotia: Implication for the maceral-based interpretation of rheotrophic and raised paleomires. Bull De La Soc Geol De France 162:283–298
[6] Cohen AD, Spackman W (1972) Methods in peat petrology and their application to reconstruction of paleoenvironments. Geol Soc Am Bull 83:129–142
[7] Cohen AD, Spackman W, Raymond R (1987) Interpreting the characteristics of coal seams from chemical, physical and petrographic studies of peat deposits. In: Scott AC (ed.), Coal and coal-bearing strata: recent advances. Geological Society Special Publication No. 32, pp. 107–125
[8] Das D (1959) On the fusian of Talcher coalfield, Orissa. J Geol Soc India 31:167–170
[9] Das NK, Rath BD (1974) A note on the coal exploration in the western extension of Talchir coalfield. Explorer, 5–13
[10] Deng XL, Sun YZ (2011) Coal petrological characteristics and coal facies of No. 11 seam from the Antaibao mine, Ningwu coalfield, China. Energy Explor Exploit 29:315–326
[11] Diessel CFK (1965) On the correlation between coalfacies and depositional environment. In: Proceedings of the 20th Sydney Basin Symposium. Department of Geology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, pp. 19–22
[12] Diessel CFK (1986) An appraisal of coal facies based on maceral characteristics. Aust Coal Geol 4:474–484
[13] Diessel CFK (1992) Coal-bearing depositional systems. Springer, Berlin 721p
[14] Duan DJ, Zhao CL, Qin SJ, Kalkreuth W, Lin MY (2011) Coal petrological and coal facies characteristics of the No. 2 seam from Huangling mine, Shanxi Province, China. Energy Explor Exploit 29:647–665
[15] Fox CS (1934) The lower Gondwana coalfields of India. Mem Geol Surv India 59:386p
[16] Goswami S (2002) Studies on geology and palaeontology of Gondwana sequence of Ib River Coalfield, Sambalpur, Jharsuguda and Sundargarh districts, Orissa, India and their biostratigraphic significance. Ph.D. Thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, pp. 1–282
[17] Gould R, Shibaoka M (1980) Some aspects of the formation and petrographic features of coal members in Australia, with special reference to the Tasman Orogenic Zone. Aust Coal Geol 2:1–29
[18] Grady WC, Eble CF, Neuzil SG (1993) Brown coal maceral distributions in a modern domed tropical Indonesian peat and a comparison with maceral distributions in Middle Pennsylvanian- age appalachian bituminous coal beds. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 286:63–82
[19] Hacquebard PA, Donaldson JR (1969) Carboniferous coal deposition associated with flood plain and limnic environments in Nova Scotia. In: Dapples EC, Hopkins ME (ed), Environment of coal deposition. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 114:143–191
[20] Harvey RD, Dillon JW (1985) Maceral distributions in Illinois coals and their paleo-environmental implications. Int J Coal Geol 5:141–165
[21] Hawke MI, Martini IP, Stasiuk LD (1999) A comparison of temperate and boreal peats from Ontario, Canada: possible modern analogues for Permian coals. Int J Coal Geol 41:213–238
[22] Hunt JW (1989) Permian coals of eastern Australia: geological control of petrographic variation. Int J Coal Geol 12:589–634
[23] Hunt JW, Smyth M (1989) Origin of inertinite rich coals of Australian cratonic basins. Int J Coal Geol 11:23–46
[24] International Committee for Coal and Organic Petrology (1998) The new vitrinite classification (ICCP System 1994). Fuel 77:349–358
[25] International Committee for Coal Petrology (1971) International handbook of coal petrography, 2nd edn. Centre National de recherche Scientifique, Paris
[26] International Committee for Coal Petrology (2001) The new inertinite classification (ICCP System 1994). Fuel 80:459–471
[27] ISO 7404-5 (1994) Methods for the petrographic analysis of bituminous coal and anthracite—Part 5: method of determining microscopically the reflectance of vitrinite. ISO, Geneva, p 11
[28] Kalkreuth WD, Marchioni DL, Calder JH, Lamberson MN, Naylor RD, Paul J (1991) The relationship between coal petrography and depositional environments from selected coal basins in Canada. In: Kalkreuth WD, Bustin RM, Cameron AR (eds) Recent advances in organic petrology and geochemistry. A symposium honouring Dr P Hacquebard. Int J Coal Geol 19:21–76
[29] Kizilstein LY, Minaeva LG (1972) Proiskhazhdeniji framboidlnikh form pyrite. Doki Acad Nauk USSR 206:1187–1189
[30] Kizilstein LY, Trufanov VN (1968) Proiskhazhdeniji singeoeticbnogo pyrita. V ugolnikh ln: Uglenasmniji Formatsii I Ugolnije. Mestorozhdenija. Nauka. Moskow, pp. 123–127
[31] Krausel R (1961) Palaeobotanical evidence of climate. In: Nairn AEM (ed) Descriptive palaeoclimatology. Inter-Science Publishers, New York, pp 227–254
[32] Lamberson MN, Bustin RM, Kalkreuth W (1991) Lithotype (maceral) composition and variation as correlated with paleo-wetland environments, Gates Formation, Karharbari British Columbia, Canada. Int J Coal Geol 18:87–124
[33] Ligouis B, Doubinger J (1991) Petrology, palynology and depositional environments of the ‘Grande Couche de Bourroan’ from the stephanian basin of Decazeville, france. Bull De La Soc Geol De France 162:302–323
[34] Lin MY, Tian L (2011) Petrographic characteristics and depositional environment of the No. 9 coal (Pennsylvanian) from the Anjialing Mine, Ningwu coalfield, China. Energy Explor Exploit 29:197–204
[35] Mackowsky MT (1982) Minerals and trace elements occurring in coal. In: Stach E et al (eds) Stach’s textbook of coal petrology. Gebr Borntraeger, Berlin, pp 356–361
[36] Marchionni DL (1980) Petrography and depositional environments of the Liddel seam, Upper Hunter Valley, New South Wales. Int J Coal Geol 1:36–61
[37] Marques M (2002) Coal facies and depositional environments of the Aurora and Cabeza de Vaca Units, Peñarroya–Belmez–Espiel Coalfield (Cordoba, Spain). Int J Coal Geol 48:197–216
[38] Mishra SK, Mohanty JK, Nanda B (1998) FTIR study of lower Gondwana coals from Talcher, Orissa. J Geol Soc India 51:371–376
[39] Mohanty JK, Mishra SK, Nayak BB (2001) Sequential leaching of trace elements in coal: a case study from Talcher coalfield, Orissa. J Geol Soc India 58:441–447
[40] Mukhopadhyay PK (1986) Petrography of selected Wilcox and Jockson Group lignites from Tertiary of Texas. In: Finkelman RB, Casagrande DJ (ed.), Geology of gulf coast lignites. Annual Meeting in Geological Society of America, Coal Geology Division Field Trip, pp. 126–145
[41] Navale GKB (1965) Petrographic analysis of some coals from Talcher coalfield. Met Miner Rev 1:5–12
[42] Navale GKB (1966) Petrographical and sporological studies of some coals from Talcher coalfield Orissa, India. Paleobotanist 14:61–69
[43] Navale GKB (1971) Petrological study of the coals exposed near Gopalprasad of Talcher Coalfield, Orissa, India. Paleobotanist 18:658–663
[44] Neavel RC (1966) Sulfur in coal and its distribution in the seam and in mine products. Ph.D. Thesis (Unpublished). Pennsylvania State University, p. 332
[45] Pareek HS (1955) Study of Talcher coals. J Sci Ind Res India 14:606
[46] Pareek HS (1958) Fungal bodies in Talchir coals. J Palacont Soc India 3:214–225
[47] Pareek HS (1963a) Petrology of Talcher coals. Econ Geol 58:1089–1109
[48] Pareek HS (1963b) The nature and origin of certain micro-constituents in the coals of Talcher coalfield, India. C R Congr Int Strat Geol Carbonif 3:991–995
[49] Pareek H S (1956) The petrology of coals from Talcher coalfield, India. Resumenes de Los Trabajos Presentadox XX Intern Geol Congr Mexico, pp. 199–200
[50] Pascoe EH (1959) A manual of geology of India and Burma, 3rd edn. Government of India Press, Calcutta, p 1343
[51] Raja Rao CS (1982) Bulletins of the geological survey of India, series A, No. 45, coalfields of India, coal resources of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa and Maharastra, pp. 41–52
[52] Renton JJ (1979) The mineral content of coal. In: Donaldson AC, Presley MW, Renton IJ (eds), Carboniferous coals. W.Va. Geol Surv 1:208–225
[53] Reyes-Navarro J, Davis A (l976) Pyrite in coals. Its form and distribution as related to the environments of coal deposition in three selected coals From Western Pennsylvania. Special Report. No Sr.110 coal research section. Pennsylvania State University, State College, p. 141
[54] Sebag D, Copard Y, Di-Giovanni Ch, Durand A, Laignel B, Ogier S, Lallier-Verges E (2006) Palynofacies as a useful tool to study the origins and transfers of particulate organic matter in recent terrestrial environments: synopsis and prospects. Earth Sci Rev 79:241–259
[55] Shearer JC, Clarkson BR (1998) Whangamarino wetland: effects of lowered river levels on peat and vegetation. Int Peat J 8:52–65
[56] Silva MB, Kalkreuth W, Holz M (2008) Coal petrology of coal seams from the Leão- Butiá Coalfield, Lower Permian of the Paraná Basin, Brazil—implications for coal facies interpretations. Int J Coal Geol 73:331–358
[57] Singh MP, Singh PK (1996) Petrographic characterization and evolution of the Permian coal deposits of the Rajmahal basin, Bihar, India. Int J Coal Geol 29:93–118
[58] Singh MP, Singh AK (2000) Petrographic characteristics and depositional conditions of Eocene coals of platform basin, Meghalaya. Int J Coal Geol 42:315–356
[59] Singh PK, Singh MP, Singh AK, Arora M (2010a) Petrographic characteristics of coal from the Lati formation, Tarakan basin, Eeast Kalimantan, Indonesia. Int J Coal Geol 81:109–116
[60] Singh PK, Singh MP, Singh AK (2010b) Petro-chemical characterization and evolution of Vastan Lignite, Gujarat, India. Int J Coal Geol 82:1–16
[61] Singh PK, Singh MP, Prachiti PK, Kalpana MS, Manikyamba C, Lakshminarayana G, Singh AK, Naik AS (2012a) Petrographic characteristics and carbon isotopic composition of Permian coal: Implications on depositional environment of Sattupalli coalfield, Godavari Valley, India. Int J Coal Geol 90–91:34–42
[62] Singh PK, Singh MP, Singh AK, Naik AS (2012b) Petrographic and geochemical characterization of coals from Tiru valley, Nagaland, NE India. Energy Explor Exploit 30:171–192
[63] Singh AK, Singh MP, Singh PK (2013) Petrological investigations of Oligocene coals from foreland basin of northeast India. Energy Explor Exploit 31:909–936
[64] Skripchenko NS, Berberian TK (1975) Structura framboidalnogo pyritoc. Geo Rudn Mestarozhl 5:107–112
[65] Smyth M (1979) Hydrocarbon generation in the Fly Lake, Brolga area of the Cooper basin. J Aust Petrol Assoc 19:108–114
[66] Smyth M (1980) Thick coal members: products of an inflationary environment. Aust Coal Geol 2:53–72
[67] Smyth M (1984) Coal microlithotypes related to sedimentary environments in the Cooper Basin, Australia. Spec Publ Int Asso Sedimentol 7:333–347
[68] Styan WB, Bustin RM (1983) Petrography of some Fraser Delta peat deposits: coal maceral and microlithotype precursors in temperate-climate peats. Int J Coal Geol 2:321–370
[69] Suárez-Ruiz I, Flores D, Filho JGM, Hackley PC (2012) Review and update of the applications of organic petrology: Part 1, geological applications. Int J Coal Geol 99:54–112
[70] Subramanian KS (1971) Coal resources of India. Mem Geol Surv 88:575p
[71] Teichmüller M (1982a) Origin of the petrographic constituents of coals. In: Stach E (ed) Stach’s textbook of coal petrology. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Stuttgart, pp 219–294
[72] Teichmüller M (1982b) Fluorescence microscopical changes of liptinites and vitrinites during coalification and their relationship to bitumen generation and coking behaviour. TSOP Spec Publ 1:74
[73] Teichmuller M, Durand B (1983) Fluorescence microscopical rank studies on liptinites and vitrinites in peats and coals and comparison with results of the rock-eval pyrolysis. Int J Coal Geol 2:197–230
[74] Teichmüller M, Teichmüller R (1975) The geological basis of coal formation. In: Stach E, Mackowsky MT, Teichmiiller M, Taylor GH, Chandra D, Teichmiiller R (eds) Stach’s textbook of coal petrology. Gebruiider Borntraeger, Stuttgart, pp 5–54
[75] Teichmuller M, Teichmuller R (1982) The geological basis of coal formation. In: Stach E, Mackowsky MT, Teichmiiller M, Taylor GH, Chandra D, Teichmiiller R (eds) Stach’s textbook of coal petrology. Gebruiider Borntraeger, Stuttgart, pp 5–86
[76] Tiwari RS, Tripathi A, Vijaya (1995) Organicwalled microfossils of doubtful origin in Permian and Triassic sequences on Peninsular India. Palaeobotanist 43:1–38

Funding

Thanks to the Director, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Petroleum Technology, Rae Bareli for providing all the necessary facilities. Author is also thankful to the Professor-In charge of the Coal & Organic Petrology Laboratory for extending the facilities for the coal petrography and fund from CSIR. Author is grateful to the anonymous reviewers whose constructive critiques greatly improved the manuscript.

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, A.K. Petrographic characterization and evolution of the Karharbari coals, Talcher Coalfield, Orissa, India.Int J Coal Sci Technol 3, 133–147 (2016).
  • Received

    20 October 2015

  • Revised

    14 April 2016

  • Accepted

    07 June 2016

  • Issue Date

    June 2016

  • DOI

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-016-0132-3

  • Share this article

    Copy to clipboard

For Authors

Explore