Owned by: China Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by: China Coal Society
Published by: Springer Nature
About issue

The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal. It focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development, serving as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues.


Coverage includes original research articles, new developments, case studies and critical reviews in all aspects of scientific and engineering research on coal, coal utilizations and coal mining. Among the broad topics receiving attention are coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology; coal mining theory, technology and engineering; coal processing, utilization and conversion; coal mining environment and reclamation and related aspects.


The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs so authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.


The journal operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous.


  • A forum for new research findings, case studies and discussion of important challenges in coal science and mining development

  • Offers an international perspective on coal geology, coal mining, technology and engineering, coal processing, utilization and conversion, coal mining environment and reclamation and more

  • Published with the China Coal Society

Show More
Editors-in-Chief
Suping Peng, Shimin Liu
Managing Editor
Wanjie Wang
Associate Editors
Bo Hyun Kim, Dongjie Xue, Pedram Roghanchi, Wu Xiao, Zhiqiang Wu
Publishing model
Open Access. Learn about publishing OA with us
Home > Volumes and issues > Volume 4, issue 7

Identification of nitrogen-polyaromatic compounds in asphaltene from co-processing of coal and petroleum residue using chromatography with mass spectrometry

Research Article

Open Access

Published: 28 July 2017

0 Accesses

International Journal of Coal Science & Technology Volume 4, 281-299, (2017)

Abstract

Asphaltene, from co-processing of coal and petroleum residues is one of the most precious and complex molecular mixtures existing, with tremendous economic relevance. Asphaltene was separated by Soxhlet extraction with methylbenzene and then divided into three parts by distillation. Gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Q-TOF MS) to separate and characterize organic nitrogen species in the distillates of asphaltene at molecular level. Molecular mass of compounds was mainly distributed from 150 to 600 μ. Number of rings plus double bonds (rdb) and synchronous fluorescence spectra indicated that most of the organonitrogen compounds (NPAC) contained heterocyclic aromatic rings, including pyridines, anilines, quinolins, pyrroles, carbazoles and indoles plus various alkyl groups. Constant-wavelength synchronous fluorescence spectrometry (CWSFS) indicated NPAC with 2–3 rings were the main structures of organonitrogen compounds and the corresponding structural information was proposed. Some organic nitrogen isomers were separated and identified by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) GC-Q-TOF MS and electrospray ionization (ESI) HPLC-Q-TOF MS. The methodology applied here contained chromatographic injection of the diluted sample using conventional columns sets and Data Analysis 4.2 software. Identifying molecular structures provides a foundation to understand all aspects of coal-derived asphaltene, enabling a first-principles approach to optimize resource utilization.

1.Introduction

Co-processing of coal and petroleum residues is a promising way for converting coal and petroleum residues into oil and an amount of residues. The content of asphaltene in residues is up to 40%, it is an important precursor to gasification, synthesis carbon materials and asphalt. As complex mixture, it is difficult to separate and identify of composite of asphaltene (Zhang et al. 2002; Ying et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2013). In fact, asphaltene, which is rich in aromatic compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and believed as the polar fraction, has the N, O, S atoms, some of which substitute the carbon in the aromatic chain normally (Gargiulo et al. 2016). Soxhlet extraction, a nondestructive separation technique, can well separate and enrich compounds with similar solubility and polarity from a mixture. Generally, the residues components are separated into several fractions based on the different solubility in n-hexane (n-heptane), tetrahydrofuran (THF) and toluene. The composition that can be dissolved in benzene or toluene-soluble but undissolved in alkanes-insoluble fraction is defined as asphaltene (Mullins et al. 2012; Wu and Kessler 2015). While the complexity compounds cannot be represented by a single model or representative structure and required accurate perspectives distributions and structural features of these residues. One of the most important, understanding the modes of occurrence and distribution of heteroatoms in residues is also necessary for potential application.

N-polyaromatic compounds is widely existed in coal and petroleum residues, it could be used as photoconductors, semiconductors (Plater and Jackson 2003) and they are valuable constituents of pharmacologically active synthetic compounds and agrochemical intermediates (Li et al. 2015; Matzke et al. 2015; Gargiulo et al. 2016). N-polyaromatic compounds (NPAC) generally were classified into two types: neutral pyrrolic and basic pyridinic. The neutral organonitrogen consists of indole, pyrrole, carbazole and their alkylated analogues, while the basic organonitrogen contains pyridines, quinolines, benzoquinolines and their alkylated analogues (da Silva et al. 2014). Thus, it is essential to characterize these structures in order to understand their roles and behaviors, also to find effective approaches to separate and effectively utilize.

GC coupled to different mass spectrometry detectors, including GC-Q-TOF MS, has been proven a powerful tool to separate and analyze complex components in the complex fuel-derived mixtures, such as coal tars, pitches, and petroleum asphaltenes, especially for lower molecular-mass (MM) components (Beens et al. 2000; Barman et al. 2001; da Silva et al. 2014).

The majority of the compounds in asphaltene are not volatile enough for GC analysis, HPLC–MS is a better choice with higher molecular mass, and/or lower thermal stability. Reversed-phase (RP) LC accompanied by ESI is commonly used for investigation of polar compounds, like NPAC. It was reported that isomers in beeswax and in coal could be separated and identified using HPLC with PAH column in CH3OH system (Ares et al. 2015; You et al. 2015). These compounds in asphaltene were usually detected by UV or diode array (Smith et al. 2009; Zubkova 2011), fluorescence (George et al. 2010; Zubkova 2011) (FL) and MS detectors (Smith et al. 2009). Researchers (Wang et al. 2013) speculated that coal asphaltene liquefied at different temperatures consisted of similar aromatic structure, mainly 2–3 rings condensed nucleuses, by UV–Vis absorption spectra of coal asphaltene in THF solvent. CWSFS, which differs from the common fluorescence method and scans excitation wavelength and emission wavelength synchronously, is widely used to elucidate the fundamental properties of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of complex mixtures like asphaltenes (Goncalves et al. 2004; Abdallah and Yang 2012; Pereira et al. 2014; Wu and Kessler 2015). It has better selectivity, higher sensitivity and less interference than UV–Vis absorption spectra. CWSFS presents the size of aromatic nucleuses of asphlatenes, and the increase of asphaltene aromaticity leads to the increase of fluorescence intensity. Fluorescence spectroscopy is not a very sensitive method, containing fluorophore (George et al. 2010). Sometimes deviation exists when molecular diameter of the asphaltene is measured by Fluorescence depolarization (FD) study (Abdallah and Yang 2012). With high qualitative ability and mass accuracy, Time-of-flight mass (TOF) analyzer can well separate and identify the elemental composition and chemical information, including carbon number, heteroatom content and isotopic distributions. Polar molecules (polar heteroatomic species, basic compounds with quinolones and pyridines rings) could be ionized by ESI source; while lower polarity molecules and neutral nitrogen species with pyrroles, indoles and carbazoles rings could be ionized by APCI source. Roussis et al. who first directly measured high-molecular-weight petroleum compounds reported bimodal asphaltene molecular weights of 300 < m/z < 20,000 using a hybrid magnetic sector–TOF tandem mass spectrometer (McKenna et al. 2013). However, there are many isomers with monomeric molecular weight and molecular aggregation in asphaltene, it is difficult to characterize these molecules by MS analysis.

In this work, the GC-APCI-Q-TOF MS and HPLC-FL-ESI-Q-TOF MS were applied in the speciation of NPAC of asphaltene derived from co-processing coal and oil residues. The asphaltene was subjected to distillation instead of column chromatography which was normally complex and the attendant risk of sample loss (da Silva et al. 2014). We also got several cleaner mass spectra to verify the isomers. Analytical information such as retention times, m/z, error, msiga as well as rdb was used to identify the compounds. Fluorescence spectra were complementary to predict the aromatic structures of asphlatene that were mainly inferred by the rdb values.

2.Materials and methods

2.1 Chemicals and sample

Coal sample was collected from Shenfu coal mine. Petroleum slurry was from Shijiazhuang Refining & Chemical. THF, hexane and methylbenzene were commercial analytical reagents supplied from Sinopharm (China) and were further distilled before use. Methanol and acetonitrile were purchased from Thermo Fisher scientific (USA) with purity above 99.9%.

2.2 Preparation of asphalene distillates

The co-processing of coal and oil slurry with a weight ratio of 1:1 was operated at 450 °C and in the pressure of 8 MPa in N2 for 8 h (Wu et al. 2012), and the resultant residue was named COR. COR was treated with hexane for 2 h and then insoluble substance was extracted with THF by Soxhlet extraction for 8 h. The THF-soluble fraction, called asphalt, was obtained by reduced pressure distillation after removing THF. Asphaltene was got finally by extracting asphalt in methylbenzene with Soxhlet extractor for 8 h and then separated into three parts according to distillation range: fraction a (<100 °C), fraction b (100–200 °C) and fraction c (>200 °C). The fractions were centrifuged and then diluted with methanol before analysis, shown as Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The experimental procedure

3.Characterizations

3.1 GC-APCI-Q-TOF MS spectrometry

The fraction a and b were analyzed by GC-APCI-Q-TOF MS system, which was performed with a GC-650 (Bruker, German) and a Q-TOF MS spectrometer (Bruker, German) equipped with APCI source. The column set was formed by BR-5ms capillary column (selectivity similar to 5% diphenyl/95% dimethyl polysiloxane) with 30 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter and 0.25 μm film thickness (Bruker, German). The carrier gas was nitrogen at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The injection was achieved at 250 °C with a 1:200 split ratio and an injection volume of 1.0 μL. The temperature was kept at 50 °C for 2 min and reached 300 °C at 8 °C/min and for 10 min. In the APCI source, nebulizer pressure, capillary voltage, dry heater, and flow rate of dry gas were set to 3.0 bar, 3000 V, 250 °C and 2.5 L/min, respectively. Data were collected over a mass range of 50–500 Daltons.

3.2 HPLC-FL-ESI-QTOF-MS spectrometry

All distillates, a, b and c, were analyzed by an HPLC (Thermo, USA)-fluorescence spectrophotometer (HITACHI F-7000, Japan)-ESI-QTOF-MS. Samples (5 μL) were injected into the HPLC equipped with a Zorbax PAH column (4.6 mm id × 25 mm; 5 μm particle size, Agilent, USA) by an autosampler with a 0.5 mL/min isocratic elution (80:20 methanol/water) flow rate, and temperature of the column was maintained at 25 °C.

CWSFS was operated as follow: the spectrometer was set to scan at a rate of 240 nm/min with a slit width of 5 nm. Synchronous spectra covered a 240–500 nm range at a constant wavelength difference of 14 nm between emission and excitation wavelengths. PMT voltage was 400 V.

In the ESI source, capillary voltage, nebulizer pressure, dry heater, and flow rate of dry gas were set to 4500 V, 2.0 bar, 350 °C, 220 °C and 10 L/min, respectively. The separated analytes were monitored by the Q-TOF-MS with m/z from 50 to 1000 μ in positive ion mode.

Elemental Analysis was operated on elemental analyzer (vario M-CUBE, Germany).

4.Results and discussion

4.1 Analysis by double bond equivalence and fluorescence spectra

Asphaltene produced by co-processing of coal and oil slurry accounted for more than 80% (weight percentage) of asphalt, the amount of nitrogen in this asphaltene is about 0.7% which is relatively low compared to coal (varying from 1% to 2%) (Barman et al. 2001; da Silva et al. 2014), many N-polyaromatic compounds were tentatively identified of which mass spectral fragmentation patterns are very unique and easily identified.

Species were detected as protonated molecules: [M + H]+ ion both in Figs. 2 and 3. Figure 2a, b showed the APCI (+)-Q-TOF MS results for fraction a and b separated by GC. Figure 3a–c showed the ESI (+)-Q-TOF MS spectra of fraction a, b and c separated by HPLC, respectively. More than one hundred peeks were detected, sometimes chromatographic separation was not efficient, but the simultaneous sampling mode and the process of spectral deconvolution of Q-TOF MS produced a mass spectrum more reliable than those produced by scanning mass analyzers, like quadrupole analyzer. Several compounds may flow out at same time in MS spectra, the paper focused on the compounds with relatively high intensity.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The Base Peak Chromatogram (BPC) of fraction a and b analyzed by GC-APCI-MS, fourteen peeks were identified in a and twenty-five peeks were identified in b. Some compounds may flow out at same time

Fig. 3
figure 3

The BPC of fraction a, b and c analyzed by HPLC–ESI–MS, fifteen, eleven and ten peeks were identified, respectively. Some compounds may flow out at same time

The molecular-mass of N-containing compounds in asphaltene were mainly from 150 to 600 μ. The high resolution mass Base Peak Chromatogram (BPC) spectra offered accurate ion molecular formulas ([M + H]+). The ion molecular formula was limited to a maximum numbers for 5 Nitrogen, 2 Sulfur, and 10 Oxygen. The identification of compounds was mainly based on the follow parameters: retention times, ion formula ([M + H]+), measured m/z (Meas. m/z), deviation between measured mass and theoretical mass of the selected peak ([mDa]) and mSigma. MSigma is a rate describing how well the theoretical isotopic peaks match to the sample isotopic peaks. Generally, the values were set as <5 mDa for deviation and <100 for mSigma, the lower was the better. Table 1 only showed the tentatively identified N-compounds of the minimum deviation and mSigma processed using the Data Analysis 4.2 software. For instance, [C16H12N]+ (m/z = 218.0964) was detected at 24.7 min with mDa = 1.1 and mSigma = 1.9 in Fig. 2b, at 18.2 min with mDa = 1.3 and mSigma = 88.9 in Fig. 3a, 23.7 min with mDa = 1.4 and mSigma = 41.2 in Fig. 3b, at 24.4 min with mDa = 0.1 and mSigma = 8.8 in Fig. 3c, respectively. Table 1 only showed the last set of data in comprehensive consideration of deviation and mSigma. The composition of compound is expressed by the class of chemical formula such as C x H y N β O α S γ . Rdb is calculated from the number of atoms and their valency indicating the degree of unsaturation for molecules. The valences of C, N, O, S and H were assumed as 4, 3, 2, 2 and 1, respectively, as follow:

Table 1 Tentatively N-compounds identified in Figs. 2 and 3

No.

Time 2 (min)

Time 3 (min)

Meas. m/z

Ion formula [M + H]+

|err| [mDa]

mSigma

rdb of [M + H]+

2-a

2-b

3a

3b

3c

GC

GC

LC

LC

LC

1

10.3

    

130.0649

C9H8N

0.2

4.2

6.5

2

  

12.5

  

144.0822

C10H10N

1.4

10.1

6.5

3

   

12.7

 

156.0808

C11H10N

0.0

37.3

7.5

4

  

16.4

  

158.0972

C11H12N

0.8

14.3

6.5

5

   

17.3

 

164.1433

C11H18N

0.1

13.6

3.5

6

 

18.5

   

168.0801

C12H10N

0.7

19.2

8.5

7

  

14.0

  

170.0961

C12H12N

0.3

14.1

7.5

8

   

15.8

 

172.112

C12H14N

0.1

16.3

6.5

9

    

19.7

180.0815

C13H10N

0.7

5.8

9.5

10

 

19.9

   

182.0955

C13H12N

1.0

5.9

8.5

11

 

16.7

   

184.1168

C13H14N

4.7

12.8

7.5

12

   

21.2

 

194.0966

C14H12N

0.1

29.3

9.5

13

 

20.9

   

196.1097

C14H14N

2.4

9.2

8.5

14

 

21.8

   

204.0791

C15H10N

1.6

5.2

11.5

15

  

16.4

  

206.0987

C15H12N

2.3

77.4

10.5

16

  

21.4

  

208.1134

C15H14N

1.4

66.0

9.5

17

    

24.4

218.0963

C16H12N

0.1

8.8

11.5

18

    

46.5

230.0975

C17H12N

1.1

12.1

12.5

19

 

26.3

   

232.1102

C17H14N

1.9

3.0

11.5

20

 

24.6

   

244.118

C18H14N

4.9

64.9

12.5

21

  

31.1

  

254.0979

C19H12N

1.5

19.9

14.5

22

   

9.8

 

138.092

C8H12NO

0.7

28.8

3.5

23

   

10.6

 

142.1229

C8H16NO

0.3

28.3

1.5

24

    

7.7

158.1544

C9H20NO

0.5

28.0

0.5

25

    

7.7

180.1341

C11H18NO

4.2

6.3

3.5

26

 

8.0

   

200.1996

C12H26NO

1.3

50.0

0.5

27

   

12.7

 

196.0758

C13H10NO

0.2

75.2

9.5

28

   

14.1

 

210.0913

C14H12NO

0.0

8.7

9.5

29

    

7.7

222.088

C15H12NO

3.3

81.8

10.5

30

    

11.6

232.0748

C16H10NO

0.9

57.9

12.5

31

14.4

    

256.2617

C16H34NO

1.8

1.5

0.5

32

14.3

    

246.0907

C17H12NO

0.6

29.1

12.5

33

 

19.4

   

252.139

C17H18NO

0.7

16.1

9.5

34

 

23.5

   

282.2777

C18H36NO

1.4

32.4

1.5

35

  

21.4

  

274.1245

C19H16NO

1.9

58.7

12.5

36

  

13.3

  

314.1588

C22H20NO

4.9

50.6

13.5

37

  

13.3

  

432.2366

C31H30NO

4.4

35.2

17.5

38

   

11.4

 

130.067

C6H12NS

1.5

41.3

1.5

39

   

14.1

 

144.0821

C7H14NS

2.0

18.0

1.5

40

   

12.7

 

156.0808

C8H14NS

3.4

58.3

2.5

41

  

11.7

  

158.0984

C8H16NS

1.4

15.1

1.5

42

  

14.0

  

170.0961

C9H16NS

3.7

29.1

2.5

43

  

16.4

  

172.1123

C9H18NS

3.1

29.1

1.5

44

    

14.9

180.082

C10H14NS

2.1

8.3

4.5

45

  

16.4

  

194.0985

C11H16NS

1.2

46.3

4.5

46

    

33.0

204.082

C12H14NS

4.9

24.9

6.5

47

  

16.4

  

206.0987

C12H16NS

1.1

83.3

5.5

48

   

21.2

 

208.1115

C12H18NS

3.9

16.9

4.5

49

  

21.4

  

218.0982

C13H16NS

1.5

33.0

6.5

50

  

17.1

  

220.1108

C13H18NS

4.7

90.8

5.5

51

  

21.4

  

230.099

C14H16NS

0.7

29.1

7.5

52

  

31.1

  

254.0979

C16H16NS

1.9

40.2

9.5

53

  

33.0

  

218.2134

C12H28NO2

2.0

17.3

−0.5

54

  

12.5

  

368.1693

C25H22NO2

4.8

30.1

15.5

55

23.5

    

396.3811

C25H50NO2

2.5

72.7

1.5

56

  

13.3

  

382.185

C26H24NO2

4.8

66.6

15.5

57

 

19.1

   

178.0757

C7H16NS2

3.9

42.1

0.5

58

  

16.4

  

194.0985

C8H20NS2

4.6

63.6

−0.5

59

 

20.0

   

204.092

C9H18NS2

4.5

57.5

1.5

60

 

19.7

   

252.139

C14H22NOS

2.7

37.4

4.5

61

  

13.3

  

432.2366

C28H34NOS

1.0

52.7

12.5

62

  

12.5

  

368.1693

C22H26NO2S

1.4

8.0

10.5

63

  

11.7

  

368.1694

C22H26NO2S

1.5

49.5

10.5

64

  

13.3

  

382.185

C23H28NO2S

1.4

64.4

10.5

65

  

13.3

  

432.2366

C25H38NOS2

2.4

75.3

7.5

66

   

21.2

 

338.2355

C19H32NO4

2.9

40.9

4.5

67

  

12.5

  

440.1892

C28H26NO4

3.6

34.1

16.5

68

  

12.5

  

368.1693

C19H30NO2S2

1.9

22.6

5.5

69

  

13.3

  

382.185

C20H32NO2S2

1.9

71.1

5.5

70

    

7.9

195.0929

C13H11N2

1.2

34.8

9.5

71

  

13.3

  

219.0913

C15H11N2

0.4

59.3

11.5

72

  

8.7

  

231.0872

C16H11N2

4.5

37.9

12.5

73

 

25.2

   

259.1237

C18H15N2

0.7

14.3

12.5

74

    

15.6

261.1362

C18H17N2

2.5

11.6

11.5

75

21.6

    

303.2804

C20H35N2

0.9

15.9

4.5

76

10.3

    

313.26

C21H33N2

3.8

19.1

6.5

77

10.3

    

341.2924

C23H37N2

2.7

43.6

6.5

78

21.4

    

511.5016

C35H63N2

3.0

61.0

5.5

79

14.3

    

199.091

C12H11N2O

4.4

27.6

8.5

80

15.7

    

213.1067

C13H13N2O

4.4

7.7

8.5

81

  

14.0

  

305.1664

C20H21N2O

1.5

56.0

11.5

82

   

19.1

 

355.2782

C23H35N2O

3.8

20.5

7.5

83

10.3

    

359.303

C23H39N2O

2.7

75.9

5.5

84

  

8.7

  

143.0682

C6H11N2S

4.5

28.0

2.5

85

14.3

    

155.0678

C7H11N2S

4.1

31.2

3.5

86

   

11.4

 

181.0824

C9H13N2S

3.0

18.0

4.5

87

    

7.9

195.0929

C10H15N2S

2.2

56.8

4.5

88

  

17.1

  

355.1301

C23H19N2S

3.8

40.9

15.5

89

   

15.8

 

365.1074

C24H17N2S

3.3

79.6

17.5

90

  

13.3

  

409.1774

C27H25N2S

4.1

46.8

16.5

91

 

13.3

   

155.0844

C7H11N2O2

2.9

35.8

3.5

92

8.9

    

157.0966

C7H13N2O2

0.5

41.3

2.5

93

10.3

    

163.1404

C7H19N2O2

3.7

81.5

−0.5

94

 

15.1

   

167.0843

C8H11N2O2

2.8

28.2

4.5

95

 

12.8

   

175.1469

C8H19N2O2

2.8

28.7

0.5

96

16.3

    

177.1577

C8H21N2O2

2.1

63.6

−0.5

97

 

19.1

   

179.0833

C9H11N2O2

1.8

74.7

5.5

98

13.1

    

191.1732

C9H23N2O2

2.2

17.5

−0.5

99

 

17.8

   

191.0839

C10H11N2O2

2.4

35.6

6.5

100

14.3

    

215.0846

C12H11N2O2

3.1

8.6

8.5

101

 

22.0

   

217.0997

C12H13N2O2

2.6

12.4

7.5

102

 

20.0

   

219.1136

C12H15N2O2

0.8

40.6

6.5

103

 

21.9

   

221.1296

C12H17N2O2

1.1

49.5

5.5

104

16.3

    

233.2186

C12H29N2O2

3.8

27.7

−0.5

105

 

23.4

   

233.1294

C13H17N2O2

0.9

64.9

6.5

106

 

23.5

   

247.2352

C13H31N2O2

1.1

34.1

−0.5

107

14.6

    

246.099

C14H13N2O2

1.9

21.5

9.5

108

 

25.2

   

245.1268

C14H17N2O2

1.7

47.6

7.5

109

 

25.2

   

247.1454

C14H19N2O2

1.3

40.0

6.5

110

 

25.3

   

311.2659

C18H35N2O2

3.4

8.7

2.5

111

   

23.7

 

399.2992

C25H39N2O2

1.4

49.8

7.5

112

    

8.5

413.1283

C28H17N2O2

0.2

49.8

21.5

113

    

14.9

579.2988

C40H39N2O2

1.8

35.9

22.5

114

  

18.2

  

355.1308

C20H23N2S2

1.1

46.3

10.5

115

  

27.1

  

361.1805

C20H29N2S2

3.8

97.8

7.5

116

  

13.3

  

409.1774

C24H29N2S2

0.7

66.3

11.5

117

  

21.4

  

413.2124

C24H33N2S2

4.4

72.4

9.5

118

  

27.1

  

463.226

C28H35N2S2

2.4

20.6

12.5

119

   

19.1

 

355.2782

C20H39N2OS

0.4

38.2

2.5

120

   

23.7

 

391.2821

C23H39N2OS

4.4

42.2

5.5

121

  

16.4

  

455.2201

C29H31N2OS

4.9

85.9

15.5

122

 

13.6

   

161.0956

C6H13N2O3

3.5

32.5

1.5

123

 

19.4

   

207.0793

C10H11N2O3

2.9

98.6

6.5

124

21.6

    

333.315

C18H41N2O3

3.8

70.7

−0.5

125

23.5

    

375.356

C21H47N2O3

2.1

82.5

−0.5

126

   

23.7

 

365.1349

C21H21N2O2S

3.1

39.5

12.5

127

    

8.5

413.1283

C25H21N2O2S

3.6

55.6

16.5

128

16.4

    

445.1034

C28H17N2O2S

2.8

78.2

21.5

129

  

13.3

  

453.1678

C28H25N2O2S

4.7

66.7

17.5

130

  

18.7

  

465.1681

C29H25N2O2S

5.0

63.8

18.5

131

  

17.8

  

449.1734

C26H29N2OS2

1.9

67.6

13.5

132

  

16.4

  

455.2201

C26H35N2OS2

1.5

99.1

10.5

133

  

27.1

  

425.1746

C24H29N2OS2

3.0

70.9

11.5

134

  

31.1

  

659.2909

C44H39N2O4

0.4

37.4

26.5

135

   

21.2

 

365.1348

C18H25N2O2S2

0.4

59.6

7.5

136

  

13.3

  

453.1678

C25H29N2O2S2

1.3

42.9

12.5

137

  

18.7

  

465.1681

C26H29N2O2S2

1.6

67.8

13.5

138

   

23.7

 

365.1349

C17H21N2O7

0.6

34.8

8.5

139

  

13.3

  

415.2117

C19H31N2O8

4.2

31.7

5.5

140

  

13.3

  

437.1948

C21H29N2O8

3.0

29.1

8.5

141

  

33.0

  

463.2266

C20H35N2O10

2.0

41.3

4.5

142

  

13.3

  

409.1774

C23H25N2O5

1.6

33.4

12.5

143

  

27.1

  

425.1746

C23H25N2O6

3.9

28.6

12.5

144

  

13.3

  

453.1678

C24H25N2O7

2.2

72.4

13.5

145

  

18.7

  

465.1681

C25H25N2O7

2.5

29.3

14.5

146

  

16.4

  

455.2201

C25H31N2O6

2.4

87.8

11.5

147

  

33.0

  

463.2266

C27H31N2O5

3.9

27.9

13.5

148

   

18.3

 

579.2915

C29H43N2O10

0.3

10.4

9.5

149

  

16.4

  

158.0972

C6H12N3O2

4.8

13.4

2.5

150

 

23.4

   

210.0897

C9H12N3O3

2.4

47.3

5.5

151

    

18.5

206.094

C10H12N3O2

1.6

36.1

6.5

152

17.5

    

311.318

C18H39N4

1.1

16.0

1.5

153

    

15.1

301.1435

C19H17N4

1.1

6.1

13.5

154

20.5

    

353.3638

C21H45N4

0.0

17.1

1.5

155

  

27.1

  

345.2063

C22H25N4

1.1

9.4

12.5

156

16.1

    

365.3642

C22H45N4

0.3

24.0

2.5

157

17.5

    

377.3634

C23H45N4

0.5

20.4

3.5

158

  

18.7

  

375.16

C25H19N4

0.4

36.4

18.5

159

21.6

    

449.457

C28H57N4

0.7

23.5

2.5

160

  

27.1

  

425.1746

C29H21N4

1.5

60.4

21.5

161

  

17.8

  

449.1734

C31H21N4

2.6

16.2

23.5

162

  

16.4

  

455.2201

C31H27N4

3.0

35.0

20.5

163

  

12.5

  

337.1997

C20H25N4O

2.6

39.5

10.5

164

16.1

    

351.3119

C20H39N4O

0.1

90.6

3.5

165

21.6

    

353.3321

C20H41N4O

4.6

9.9

2.5

166

23.5

    

381.3629

C22H45N4O

4.1

24.3

2.5

167

   

23.7

 

365.1349

C23H17N4O

4.8

23.5

17.5

168

23.5

    

395.3783

C23H47N4O

3.9

10.6

2.5

169

20.5

    

421.3913

C25H49N4O

1.2

13.4

3.5

170

  

18.7

  

465.1681

C31H21N4O

2.9

56.2

23.5

171

  

18.7

  

375.16

C22H23N4S

3.8

29.6

13.5

172

  

27.1

  

425.1746

C26H25N4S

4.9

56.6

16.5

173

  

13.3

  

415.2117

C25H27N4O2

1.1

22.0

14.5

174

  

13.3

  

437.1948

C27H25N4O2

2.4

11.2

17.5

175

  

31.1

  

371.2049

C20H27N4O3

2.8

54.7

9.5

176

   

23.7

 

467.1114

C29H15N4O3

2.5

36.6

24.5

177

    

14.9

579.2988

C35H39N4O4

2.2

18.6

18.5

178

  

31.1

  

659.2909

C39H39N4O6

4.4

13.4

22.5

179

    

14.9

579.2988

C28H43N4O9

3.7

33.1

9.5

180

  

12.5

  

440.1892

C22H26N5O5

3.6

4.2

12.5

181

8.9

    

338.3281

C19H40N5

0.3

12.6

2.5

182

   

17.3

 

338.2364

C20H28N5

2.5

34.7

9.5

183

  

12.3

  

440.1887

C29H22N5

1.7

46.0

21.5

184

20.5

    

380.3409

C21H42N5O

2.6

18.5

3.5

185

  

12.5

  

440.1892

C26H26N5S

1.1

40.2

16.5

186

  

12.5

  

440.1892

C23H30N5S2

4.5

66.7

11.5

187

  

13.3

  

432.2366

C25H30N5O2

2.8

45.8

13.5

188

   

23.7

 

365.1349

C18H17N6O3

0.8

23.0

13.5

189

  

13.3

  

437.1948

C22H25N6O4

1.6

15.9

13.5

190

  

27.1

  

425.1746

C24H21N6O2

2.5

35.6

17.5

191

23.5

    

396.3811

C21H46N7

0.2

58.8

2.5

192

  

13.3

  

415.2117

C20H35N2O3S2

3.4

28.0

4.5

193

  

13.3

  

409.1774

C20H29N2O5S

1.8

52.1

7.5

194

  

27.1

  

425.1746

C20H29N2O6S

0.5

42.7

7.5

195

   

23.7

 

467.1114

C20H23N2O9S

0.5

52.6

10.5

196

  

13.3

  

453.1678

C18H33N2O7S2

4.6

30.0

3.5

197

  

18.7

  

465.1681

C19H33N2O7S2

4.2

67.5

4.5

198

  

13.3

  

453.1678

C21H29N2O7S

1.2

49.8

8.5

199

  

18.7

  

465.1681

C22H29N2O7S

0.9

46.5

9.5

200

  

12.3

  

440.1887

C17H34N3O6S2

0.3

31.1

2.5

201

  

12.3

  

440.1887

C20H30N3O6S

3.7

13.7

7.5

202

  

13.3

  

453.1678

C16H29N4O9S

2.8

51.2

4.5

203

  

18.7

  

465.1681

C17H29N4O9S

3.2

48.9

5.5

204

   

15.8

 

365.1074

C19H17N4O2S

0.7

56.4

13.5

205

  

33.0

  

365.1427

C20H21N4OS

0.4

60.0

12.5

206

  

8.7

  

407.1887

C20H31N4OS2

4.7

87.0

7.5

207

  

13.3

  

415.2117

C22H31N4O2S

4.5

5.1

9.5

208

  

13.3

  

437.1948

C22H33N2O3S2

2.1

43.0

7.5

209

  

12.3

  

440.1887

C22H34NO4S2

3.7

24.9

6.5

210

  

8.7

  

407.1887

C23H27N4OS

1.3

84.4

12.5

211

   

23.7

 

467.1114

C24H23N2O4S2

2.0

63.0

14.5

212

  

33.0

  

463.2266

C24H35N2O5S

0.5

48.3

8.5

213

  

12.3

  

440.1887

C25H30NO4S

0.3

15.1

11.5

214

   

19.1

 

579.2923

C25H47N4O7S2

4.2

32.3

4.5

215

   

19.1

 

579.2923

C30H47N2O5S2

0.2

38.4

8.5

216

   

19.1

 

579.2923

C33H43N2O5S

3.6

33.6

13.5

217

  

31.1

  

659.2909

C33H47N4O6S2

2.3

46.7

12.5

218

  

31.1

  

659.2909

C36H43N4O6S

1.1

28.1

17.5

219

  

31.1

  

659.2909

C40H43N4OS2

3.6

58.7

21.5

220

  

31.1

  

659.2909

C41H43N2O4S

3.0

37.6

21.5

221

  

13.3

  

453.1678

C22H25N6O3S

2.6

55.2

13.5

222

  

12.5

  

440.1892

C18H30N7O2S2

0.5

61.9

7.5

$$R + db = \frac{{2 + \sum {n(atom) \times (valency - 2)} }}{2}$$

Each double bond or naphthene increases one rdb number and eliminates two hydrogen atoms, and every increment of three rdb units results in an additional aromatic ring fused to an aromatic core (Xia et al. 2016). Table 1 listed the rdb of [M + H]+, and rdb (M) = rdb ([M + H]+) + 0.5.

The rdb of compound was combined with its CWSFS to predict the structure. As nondestructive method, Fluorescence spectroscopy was used to compare the relative sizes of aromatic ring systems of the samples separated by HPLC. The conjugated π bonds of compounds resulted in a marked shift to longer wavelengths in their fluorescence spectra. Meanwhile, the fluorescence efficiency increases significantly with the increase of aromatic rings. In consideration of the “red shift” effect caused by alkylation and heteroatom, the numbers of aromatic rings of the compounds were summarized as follows: 270–300 nm for single-ringed aromatics, 300–340 nm for double-ringed aromatics, 340–400 nm for three aromatic rings, 400–425 nm for four aromatic rings, lager than 425 nm for five- and above five-ringed aromatics (Michels et al. 1996).

In N1O α S γ (α + γ ≤ 2) group, since the minimum rdb of [M + H]+ for pyridines is 3.5, compounds with rdb < 3.5 are possible amines. The species with rdb = 3.5 may be pyridines or anilines. The ones with rdb = 4.5 may be pyridines/anilines/benzene linked an aliphatic ring or an unsaturated group. The ones with rdb = 5.5 may contain an aromatic ring and aliphatic rings and/or unsaturated groups. The compounds with rdb = 6.5 may be quinolones. Figure 2a showed the MS result of part of fraction a with lower polarity and ionized by APCI. Specifically, [C9H8N] + appeared at 10.3 min with rdb = 6.5 was presumed to be quinolone; [C16H34NO]+ (at 14.4 min) with rdb = 0.5 and [C25H50NO2]+ (at 23.5 min) with rdb = 1.5 possibly contained an amino-group. Figure 2b presented the MS result of part of fraction b also with lower polarity and ionized by APCI. For example, [C12H26NO]+ (at 8.0 min), [C7H16NS2]+ (at 19.1 min), [C9H18NS2]+ (at 20.0 min), [C18H36NO] + (at 23.5 min), of which rdb was smaller than 3.5, may be O- or S- aliphatic amines; [C14H22NOS]+ detected at 19.7 min with rdb = 4.5 may contain a pyridine/thiophene/phenyl ring with substituent group. Figure 3 showed the MS results of part of fraction a, b and c with polarity and ionized by ESI. More specifically, saturated amines were detected in Fig. 3a, as [C8H20NS2]+ and [C12H28NO2]+ (at 16.4 and 33.0 min, respectively); amines with unsaturated chain (rdb < 3.5) also appeared, for example, [C8H16NS]+ (at 11.7 min in Fig. 3a), [C8H16NO]+ (at 10.6 min, in Fig. 3b) and [C9H20NO]+ (at 7.7 min in Fig. 3c); Ions with rdb = 3.5, like [C8H12NO]+, [C11H18N]+ (at 9.8 min and 17.3 min in Fig. 3b, separately) and [C11H18NO]+ (at 7.7 min in Fig. 3c), probably were alkoxylated-anilines/pyridines; [C11H16NS]+ and [C12H18NS]+ (at 16.4 min and 21.2 min in Fig. 3a, b separately), with rdb = 4.5, may contain an aromatic ring with substituent group; [C12H16NS]+ (at 16.4 min in Fig. 3a) with rdb = 5.5 may consist of an aromatic ring and unsaturated groups and/or aliphatic rings. Ions with rdb = 6.5, like [C10H10N]+, [C11H12N]+ (at 12.5 and 16.4 min in Fig. 3a, respectively) and [C12H14N]+ (at 15.8 min in Fig. 3b), contained quinolone rings possibly.

In N1O α S γ (α + γ ≤ 2) group, the molecular structure became more complex with rdb bigger than 7.5, it may contain a phenylpyridine ring/quinoline ring/amine ring/an indole ring plus an unsaturated alkyl/aliphatic ring/ester/carbonyl group. For instance, ions with rdb = 7.5, like [C13H14N]+ (at 16.7 min, in Fig. 2b), [C12H12N]+ (at 14.0 min in Fig. 3a) and [C11H10N]+ (at 12.7 min in Fig. 3b), may contain a phenhylpyridine/quinolone/aniline ring. For species with rdb = 8.5, [C12H10N]+, [C13H12N]+ and [C14H14N]+ (at 18.5, 19.9 and 20.9 min, in Fig. 2b, respectively) may consist of an indenopyridine ring/carbazole ring/benzindole ring, besides an aniline ring and phenhylpyridine ring. For species with rdb ≥ 9.5, benzoquinoline/acridine/benzocarbazole may exist, for example, [C17H12NO]+ (at 14.3 min in Fig. 2a), [C15H10N]+ (at 21.8 min in Fig. 2b), [C25H22NO2]+ (at 12.5 min in Fig. 3a), [C15H12N]+ (at 16.4 min in Fig. 3a), [C13H10NO]+ (at 12.7 min in Fig. 3b), [C13H10N]+ (at 19.7 min in Fig. 3c)and so on.

CWSFS could confirm partial conjecture by rdb. Figure 4a presented the fluorescence spectra of fraction a separated by HPLC. There was moderate intensity fluorescence at 330 nm and 360 nm respectively due to C10H9N and C15H11N, indicating they had a double-ringed aromatic and three aromatic structures. The weak intensity fluorescence was around 410 nm caused by C25H21NO2 because of its four aromatic rings. All of their ions sturctures ([C10H10N]+ with rdb = 6.5, [C15H12N]+ with rdb = 11.5 and [C25H22NO2]+ with rdb = 15.5) were supposed above shown in Fig. 4a, proving that CWSFS result was consist with rdb conjecture. Figure 4b showed the fluorescence spectra of fraction b separated by HPLC. C8H11NO, C11H9N, C13H9NO had obvious fluorescence at 298 nm, 331 nm, 379 nm, due to structures of a single-ringed aromatic, double-ringed aromatic, and three aromatic rings, respectively. These were also corresponding to the conjecture by rdb mentioned before. Besides that, C11H17NO, C13H9N had strong fluorescence around 280 nm and 370 nm in Fig. 4c, separately, corresponding to single aromatic ring and three aromatic rings. These verified the alkoxylated-aniline/pyridine structures inferred by rdb = 3.5 of [C11H18NO]+ and benzoquinoline/acridine/cycloheptaindole structures with rdb = 9.5 of [C13H10N]+.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Fluorescence spectra of fraction a (a), fraction b (b) and fraction c (c) (Time in labels referred to the moment when the FL spectrometer began to scan at 240 nm at a rate of 240 nm/min. Furthermore, it took the compound 0.75 min from FL detector to MS detector. Besides, the ph referred to phenyl)

However, most of arylamines and 2-hydroxyquinoline (C9H7NO) cannot be effectively ionized and detected under the positive ion mode because of its relative weak basicity caused by hyperconjugation or the presence and position of the hydroxy group (Hughey et al. 2001; da Silva et al. 2014).

In N1O α S γ (α + γ = 3–4) group, it became complex, structures could not be proposed just by rdb, and CWSFS could be informative sometimes. For example, [C20H32NO2S2]+ (peak 5 at 13.3 min in Fig. 3a), with rdb = 5.5, may be unsaturated ketones, but it fluoresced at 290 nm indicated that it was aromatic structure.

In N2 group, the species with rdb = 4.5, like [C20H35N2]+ appeared at 21.6 min in Fig. 2a, may be a pyridine or an aniline with an amino group, unsaturated amine was also possible. The proposed structure of compound with rdb = 5.5 ([C35H63N2]+ at 21.4 min in Fig. 2a,) was indole or a pyridine or an aniline with an amino group as well as alkylated-benzimidazole. With rdb from 6.5 (as [C23H37N2]+ at 10.3 min in Fig. 2a) to 12.5 (as [C18H15N2]+ at 25.2 min in Fig. 2b), pyrrolic and pyridine rings may exist.

Moreover, in N2O α S γ (α + γ ≤ 3) group, series of species with rdb < 4.5 may have two amino groups, for example, [C7H19N2O2]+, [C9H23N2O2]+ and [C18H41N2O3]+ (at 10.3, 13.1 and 21.6 min in Fig. 2a, separately), all with rdb = −0.5, may be saturated aliphatic amines. Species with rdb > 8.5 may contain a benzoquinoline or acridine ring with an amino group besides quinoline and indole rings connected by a bridged bond, for example, [C25H22NO2]+ (at 12.5 min in Fig. 3a) with rdb = 15.5 may consists of phenyls-pyridines or ester-quinoline and so on, estimating C25H21NO2 fluoresced at longer than 400 nm shown in Fig. 4a.

As shown in Table 1, N β O α S γ (β = 3–5, α + γ = 0–10) had rdb values from 1.5 to 21.5. Since the minimal rdb number for [M + H]+ of an aromatic ring is 3.5, aliphatic amine compounds existed, like [C18H39N4]+ (rdb = 1.5, at 17.5 min in Fig. 2a).

Possible structures of partial compounds comprehensively analyzed by rdb and fluorescence spectra were exhibited in Fig. 4. In addition, lower fluorescence intensity was observed when the wavelength was longer than 420 nm in Fig. 4. Since the intensity area was proportional to the concentration of the sample in diluted solution, this indicated that the compounds mainly had less than four aromatic rings. This is applied to compare among similar compounds (as is the case on N-compounds) in the same conditions.

4.2 Isomers

This work combined chromatography with MS to separate and analyze isomers since TOF-MS could not distinguish isomers. The existence of isomers was confirmed by the apparent difference in retention time shown in Table 2 and several clean mass spectra of isomers were presented in Fig. 5. Retention times of isomers are dependent on the strength of reversible intermolecular forces of functional groups, molecular spatial structures, partition coefficient between stationary phase and mobile phase. Moreover, volatilities and polarities of isomers also played a major role in GC and HPLC separation, respectively (da Silva et al. 2014).

Table 2 Isomeric compounds detected in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3

No.

Ion formula [M + H]+

Meas. m/z

Experimental m/z

|err| [mDa]

mSigma

rdb

Retention time (min)

Detected in figures

1

C9H23N2O2

191.1733

191.1754

2.1

14.9

−0.5

13.1

2a

2

C9H23N2O2

191.1739

191.1754

1.6

16.0

−0.5

13.2

2a

3

C9H23N2O2

191.1732

191.1754

2.3

35.9

−0.5

13.5

2a

4

C13H13N2O

213.1068

213.1022

4.5

7.4

8.5

14.6

2a

5

C13H13N2O

213.1066

213.1022

4.4

4.5

8.5

15.7

2a

6

C18H39N4

311.3185

311.3169

1.6

13.0

1.5

17.5

2a

7

C18H39N4

311.3165

311.3169

0.5

24.7

1.5

18.0

2a

8

C18H39N4

311.3178

311.3169

0.9

15.2

1.5

18.2

2a

9

C18H39N4

311.3170

311.3169

0.1

15.5

1.5

18.6

2a

10

C25H50NO2

396.3811

396.3836

2.5

72.7

1.5

23.5

2a

11

C25H50NO2

396.3813

396.3836

2.3

79.0

1.5

24.0

2a

12

C25H49N4O

421.3910

421.3901

0.9

13.1

3.5

20.9

2a

13

C25H49N4O

421.3904

421.3901

0.3

17.2

3.5

21.1

2a

14

C25H49N4O

421.3915

421.3901

1.4

12.0

3.5

21.2

2a

15

C13H12N

182.0947

182.0964

1.8

7.8

8.5

19.3

2b

16

C13H12N

182.0948

182.0964

1.7

10.0

8.5

19.7

2b

17

C13H12N

182.0954

182.0964

1.0

2.3

8.5

19.9

2b

18

C14H17N2O2

245.1265

245.1285

2.0

32.2

7.5

24.6

2b

19

C14H17N2O2

245.1296

245.1285

1.2

41.0

7.5

24.8

2b

20

C14H17N2O2

245.1298

245.1285

1.4

54.4

7.5

24.9

2b

21

C10H10N

144.0819

144.0808

1.2

29.3

6.5

12.3

3a

22

C10H10N

144.0822

144.0808

1.4

10.1

6.5

12.5

3a

23

C10H10N

144.0826

144.0808

1.8

19.9

6.5

13.3

3a

24

C11H12N

158.0984

158.0964

2.0

16.6

6.5

11.7

3a

25

C11H12N

158.0977

158.0964

1.3

19.5

6.5

14.0

3a

26

C11H12N

158.0972

158.0964

0.8

14.3

6.5

16.4

3a

27

C8H16NS

158.0984

158.0998

1.4

15.1

1.5

11.7

3a

28

C8H16NS

158.0977

158.0998

2.1

28.9

1.5

14.0

3a

29

C8H16NS

158.0972

158.0998

2.6

28.4

1.5

16.4

3a

30

C12H12N

170.0959

170.0964

0.5

96.5

7.5

11.7

3a

31

C12H12N

170.0959

170.0964

0.5

96.5

7.5

14.0

3a

32

C12H12N

170.0961

170.0964

0.3

14.1

7.5

14.7

3a

33

C11H16NS

194.0985

194.0998

1.2

46.3

4.5

16.4

3a

34

C11H16NS

194.0971

194.0998

2.7

40.6

4.5

17.1

3a

35

C11H16NS

194.0969

194.0998

2.9

34.5

4.5

18.2

3a

36

C11H16NS

194.0975

194.0998

2.3

46.0

4.5

18.7

3a

37

C11H16NS

194.0980

194.0998

1.8

58.0

4.5

21.4

3a

38

C13H16NS

218.0977

218.0998

2.1

32.5

6.5

18.2

3a

39

C13H16NS

218.0986

218.0998

1.2

93.9

6.5

18.7

3a

40

C13H16NS

218.0982

218.0998

1.5

33.0

6.5

21.4

3a

41

C23H19N2S

355.1301

355.1263

3.8

40.9

15.5

17.1

3a

42

C23H19N2S

355.1308

355.1263

4.4

42.8

15.5

18.2

3a

43

C6H12NS

130.0670

130.0685

1.5

41.3

1.5

11.4

3b

44

C6H12NS

130.0666

130.0685

1.9

38.4

1.5

12.2

3b

45

C7H14NS

144.0826

144.0841

1.6

28.4

1.5

12.2

3b

46

C7H14NS

144.0829

144.0841

1.3

32.8

1.5

12.7

3b

47

C7H14NS

144.0821

144.0841

2.0

18.0

1.5

14.1

3b

48

C12H14N

172.1120

172.1121

0.1

16.3

6.5

15.8

3b

49

C12H14N

172.1120

172.1121

0.1

17.9

6.5

16.4

3b

50

C12H14N

172.1124

172.1121

0.3

20.5

6.5

17.3

3b

51

C12H14N

172.1123

172.1121

0.2

16.2

6.5

19.1

3b

52

C12H14N

172.1131

172.1121

1.0

82.8

6.5

21.2

3b

53

C9H13N2S

181.0833

181.0794

3.9

32.1

4.5

10.0

3b

54

C9H13N2S

181.0836

181.0794

4.2

24.3

4.5

10.9

3b

55

C9H13N2S

181.0824

181.0794

3.0

18.0

4.5

11.4

3b

56

C14H12N

194.0967

194.0964

0.3

48.3

9.5

16.4

3b

57

C14H12N

194.0968

194.0964

0.4

24.0

9.5

17.3

3b

58

C14H12N

194.0969

194.0964

0.5

63.8

9.5

18.3

3b

59

C14H12N

194.0968

194.0964

0.4

39.4

9.5

19.1

3b

60

C14H12N

194.0966

194.0964

0.1

29.3

9.5

21.2

3b

61

C13H10N

180.0820

180.0808

1.3

22.8

9.5

14.9

3c

62

C13H10N

180.0816

180.0808

0.8

1.8

9.5

15.6

3c

63

C13H10N

180.0817

180.0808

0.9

7.8

9.5

15.7

3c

64

C13H10N

180.0818

180.0808

1.0

18.1

9.5

18.5

3c

65

C13H10N

180.0815

180.0808

0.7

5.8

9.5

19.7

3c

66

C10H14NS

180.0820

180.0841

2.1

8.3

4.5

14.9

3c

67

C10H14NS

180.0816

180.0841

2.6

32.9

4.5

15.6

3c

68

C10H14NS

180.0817

180.0841

2.5

20.3

4.5

15.7

3c

69

C10H14NS

180.0818

180.0841

2.4

29.9

4.5

18.5

3c

70

C10H14NS

180.0815

180.0841

2.7

32.3

4.5

19.7

3c

71

C18H17N2

261.1368

261.1386

1.8

54.1

11.5

14.9

3c

72

C18H17N2

261.1362

261.1386

2.5

11.6

11.5

15.6

3c

73

C18H17N2

261.1367

261.1386

1.9

56.1

11.5

15.7

3c

74

C19H17N4

301.1435

301.1447

1.1

6.1

13.5

14.2

3c

75

C19H17N4

301.1440

301.1447

0.8

20.9

13.5

15.1

3c

Fig. 5
figure 5

EIC (a) and mass spectra (b and c) of isomers of [C11H11N2O2]+ (m/z = 203.0849) detected by GC-APCI-MS

Identification of the target peaks of isomers can be simplified by using of extracted ion chromatograms (EIC). Figure 5 shown two chromatographic peaks of [C11H11N2O2]+ (m/z = 203.0849) detected by GC-APCI MS, indicating the existence of isomers at 20.9 min and 21.4 min. Since the rdb number of C11H10N2O2 is 8, one of the possible chemical structures may be a quinoline plus various alkyl groups. Such alkyl groups with various structures induced the difference in volatilities and retention time. For another instance, Fig. 6 presented three isomers of C13H11N separated by GC.

Fig. 6
figure 6

EIC (a) and mass spectra (b and c) of isomers of [C13H12N]+ (m/z = 182.0955) detected by GC-APCI-MS

Methanol, as the mobile phase, has high adsorption effects on the NPAC due to the interactions induced by hydrogen bonds O–H···N and O–H···π. Thus compounds with low polarity have long retention times in HPLC (Xia et al. 2016). For example, Fig. 7 presented two chromatographic peaks of [C19H17N4]+ (m/z = 301.1447) detected by HPLC–ESI–MS, the isomers appearing at 14.2 min and 15.1 min. The possible structures of [C19H17N4]+ (rdb = 13.5) may contain carbazole/phenylaniline/phenylpyrimidine and so on. Thus isomeric compounds with different polarities led to flow out in HPLC in turn. C13H9N also had two isomers shown in Fig. 8.

Fig. 7
figure 7

EIC (a) and mass spectra (b and c) of isomers of [C19H17N4]+ (m/z = 301.1447) detected by HPLC–ESI–MS

Fig. 8
figure 8

EIC (a) and mass spectra (b and c) of isomers of [C13H10N]+ (m/z = 180.0820) detected by HPLC–ESI–MS

However, specific isomer structural assignment is not obtained here. We could not get the exact position of functional groups in the aromatic chain by mass spectra. For example, it is not sure that C13H9N is benzoquinoline or acridine or phenanthridine, and so on. It proposes target for following work.

5.Conclusion

N-containing compounds were extracted from asphaltene that was produced by co-processing coal tar and oil reside and purified by Soxhlet extraction. It is proven to be an effective approach for separation and detailed characterization of three distillates of N-containing compounds by GC-APCI-Q-TOF MS and HPLC-FL-ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis. More than two hundred N-compounds were tentatively identified, most of them contain N-polyaromatic aromatic rings, including pyridines, pyrroles, anilines, quinolones, carbazoles and indoles for N β O α S γ (β = 1–2) class. In N figβ O α S γ (β = 3–5) class, aliphatic amine may exist. CWSFS indicated structures of two or three aromatic rings were the majority of NPAC. Possible structures of partial compounds were proposed by comprehensive analysis of rdb and fluorescence spectra. Some isomers were separated. Characterization of the chemical compositions of NPAC in asphaltene should be beneficial to nitrogen removal and the effectively application.

References

[1] Abdallah WA, Yang Y (2012) Raman spectrum of asphaltene. Energy Fuels 26:6888–6896. doi:10.1021/ef301247n
[2] Ares AM, Gonzalez Y, Nozal MJ, Bernal JL, Higes M, Bernal J (2015) Development and validation of a liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry method to determine resveratrol and piceid isomers in beeswax. J Sep Sci 38:197–204. doi:10.1002/jssc.201400955
[3] Barman BN, Cebolla VL, Mehrotra AK, Mansfield CT (2001) Petroleum and coal. Anal Chem 73:2791–2803
[4] Beens J, Blomberg J, Schoenmakers PJ (2000) Proper tuning of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) to optimize the separation of complex oil fractions. HRC J High Res Chrom 23:182–188
[5] da Silva JM, Machado ME, Maciel GP, Dal Molin D, Caramao EB (2014) Speciation of nitrogen-containing compounds in an unfractionated coal tar sample by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1373:159–168. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2014.11.004
[6] Gargiulo V, Apicella B, Stanzione F, Tregrossi A, Milian M, Ciajolo A, Russo C (2016) Structural characterization of large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Part 2: Solvent-separated fractions of coal tar pitch and naphthalene-derived pitch. Energy Fuels 30:2574–2583. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02576
[7] George A, Morgan TJ, Alvarez P, Millan M, Herod AA, Kandiyoti R (2010) Fractionation of a coal tar pitch by ultra-filtration, and characterization by size exclusion chromatography, UV-fluorescence and laser desorption-mass spectroscopy. Fuel 89:2953–2970. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.04.011
[8] Goncalves S, Castillo J, Fernández A, Hung J (2004) Absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopy on the aggregation behavior of asphaltene–toluene solutions. Fuel 83:1823–1828. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2004.03.009
[9] Hughey CA, Hendrickson CL, Rodgers RP, Marshall AG (2001) Elemental composition analysis of processed and unprocessed diesel fuel by electrospray ionization fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Energy Fuels 15:1186–1193. doi:10.1021/ef010028b
[10] Li KJ et al (2015) Further insights into the structure and chemistry of the Gilsonite asphaltene from a combined theoretical and experimental approach. Fuel 157:16–20. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.029
[11] Matzke M, Jess A, Litzow U (2015) Polar nitrogen-containing aromatic compounds as carriers of natural diesel lubricity. Fuel 140:770–777. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.037
[12] McKenna AM et al (2013) Heavy petroleum composition. 3. Asphaltene aggregation. Energy Fuels 27:1246–1256. doi:10.1021/ef3018578
[13] Michels R, Langlois E, Ruau O, Mansuy L, Elie M, Landais P (1996) Evolution of asphaltenes during artificial maturation: a record of the chemical processes. Energy Fuels 10:39–48. doi:10.1021/ef9501410
[14] Mullins OC et al (2012) Advances in asphaltene science and the yen-mullins model. Energy Fuels 26:3986
[15] Pereira TMC et al (2014) FT-ICR MS analysis of asphaltenes: asphaltenes go in, fullerenes come out. Fuel 131:49–58. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.049
[16] Plater MJ, Jackson T (2003) Polyaromatic amines. Part 3: Synthesis of poly(diarylamino)styrenes and related compounds. Tetrahedron 59:4673–4685. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(03)00520-9
[17] Smith DR, Robb DB, Blades MW (2009) Comparison of dopants for charge exchange ionization of nonpolar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with reversed-phase LC-APPI-MS. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 20:73–79. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2008.09.012
[18] Wang ZC et al (2013) Study on the structure and association of asphaltene derived from liquefaction of lignite by fluorescence spectroscopy. Fuel 109:94–100. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.011
[19] Wu HC, Kessler MR (2015) Asphaltene: structural characterization, molecular functionalization, and application as a low-cost filler in epoxy composites. RSC Adv 5:24264–24273. doi:10.1039/c5ra00509d
[20] Wu MM, Yang JL, Zhang YZ (2012) Comparison study of modified asphalt by different coal liquefaction residues and different preparation methods. Fuel 100:66–72. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.042
[21] Xia JL, Fan X, You CY, Wei XY, Zhao YP, Cao JP (2016) Sequential ultrasonic extraction of a Chinese coal and characterization of nitrogen-containing compounds in the extracts using high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci 39:2491–2498. doi:10.1002/jssc.201600190
[22] Xu CG et al (2013) Synthesis of graphene from asphaltene molecules adsorbed on vermiculite layers. Carbon 62:213–221. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.059
[23] Ying S, Jian L, Bo LW, Su ZX (2009) Preparation of mesophase pitch using coal lique fraction residue. J China Coal Soc 34:1125–1128
[24] You CY et al (2015) Molecular characteristics of a Chinese coal analyzed using mass spectrometry with various ionization modes. Fuel 155:122–127. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.009
[25] Zhang L, Yang JL, Zhu JS, Liu ZY, Li BQ, Hu TD, Dong BZ (2002) Properties and liquefaction activities of ferrous sulfate based catalyst impregnated on two Chinese bituminous coals. Fuel 81:951–958. doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00008-X
[26] Zubkova V (2011) Chromatographic methods and techniques used in studies of coals, their progenitors and coal-derived materials. Anal Bioanal Chem 399:3193–3209. doi:10.1007/s00216-010-4328-x

About this article

Cite this article

Zuo, P., Shen, W. Identification of nitrogen-polyaromatic compounds in asphaltene from co-processing of coal and petroleum residue using chromatography with mass spectrometry.Int J Coal Sci Technol 4, 281–299 (2017).
  • Received

    21 March 2017

  • Revised

    25 June 2017

  • Accepted

    17 July 2017

  • Issue Date

    September 2017

  • DOI

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-017-0178-x

  • Share this article

    Copy to clipboard

For Authors

Explore