Owned by: China Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by: China Coal Society
Published by: Springer Nature
About issue

The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal. It focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development, serving as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues.


Coverage includes original research articles, new developments, case studies and critical reviews in all aspects of scientific and engineering research on coal, coal utilizations and coal mining. Among the broad topics receiving attention are coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology; coal mining theory, technology and engineering; coal processing, utilization and conversion; coal mining environment and reclamation and related aspects.


The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs so authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.


The journal operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous.


  • A forum for new research findings, case studies and discussion of important challenges in coal science and mining development

  • Offers an international perspective on coal geology, coal mining, technology and engineering, coal processing, utilization and conversion, coal mining environment and reclamation and more

  • Published with the China Coal Society

Show More
Editors-in-Chief
Suping Peng, Shimin Liu
Managing Editor
Wanjie Wang
Associate Editors
Bo Hyun Kim, Dongjie Xue, Pedram Roghanchi, Wu Xiao, Zhiqiang Wu
Publishing model
Open Access. Learn about publishing OA with us
Home > Volumes and issues > Volume 9, issue 5

New approach for the digital reconstruction of complex mine faults and its application in mining

Research Article

Open Access

Published: 06 June 2022

0 Accesses

International Journal of Coal Science & Technology Volume 9, article number 43, (2022)

Abstract

Visualization of complex geological structures can technically support the accurate prediction and prevention of coal mine disasters. This study proposed a new digital reconstruction method to visualize geological structures based on establishing a virtual model in the digital twin system. This methodology for the digital reconstruction of complex fault structures comprises the following four aspects: (1) collection and fidelity of multi-physical field data of the fault structures, (2) the transmission of multi-physical field data, (3) the normalization of multi-physical field data, and (4) digital model reconstruction of fault structures. The key scientific issues of this methodology to be resolved include in situ fidelity of multi-field data and normalized programming of multi-source data. In addition, according to the geological background and conditions in Da’anshan coal mine in western Beijing, China, a preliminary attempt is made to reconstruct a digital model of fault and fold structures using the methodology proposed in this study.

1.Introduction

Owing to the continuously increasing the depth and intensity of coal mining, coal bursts have become a major dynamic disaster in global underground coal mining (Jang et al. 2014; Yuan et al. 2018; Mark and Gauna 2020). There are numerous causes of coal burst accidents, with complex geological structures (primarily faults, folds, and phase transitions) being one of the most studied. For example, on August 2, 2019, coal bursts occurred due to a roadway fault in the Tangshan coal mine in Hebei Province, China. On February 22, 2020, another coal burst accident occurred around an unstable thrust fault during the coal seam mining in the Longgu coal mine in Shandong province, China (Pan and Dai 2021). According to statistics, coal bursts that occur near geological structures account for more than 70% of all coal burst accidents (Pan et al. 2003; Mark 2016). Predicting the occurrence of tectonically induced coal bursts can be greatly aided if geological structure can be effectively digitized (Mao 2020).

In fact, numerous investigations have been performed to focus on the studies of the geological structure formation mechanism, stress distribution around the structures, and the criteria for the activation of geological structures. Using the developed geological experimental system, Chen et al. (2020) investigated the development process of reverse faults as well as the evolution of stress and deformation of the hanging wall. The findings show that the dip angle of reverse faults is primarily determined via rock properties, whereas the drop is primarily determined via horizontal stress. Qi et al. (2019) adopted the field measurement analysis, theoretical analysis and numerical simulation to study the stress distribution of overlying rock structures and the occurrence mechanism of coal bursts during the mining process of mining face under the condition of large fault. Wang et al. (2019) used physical and numerical simulation to investigate the evolution characteristics of the stress field on the fault slip surface and the precursor information of fault slip and instability when mining disturbance occurred on the mining face. Zhang et al. (2020) studied the unloading effect of thrust fault caused by mining disturbance utilizing physical and numerical simulation and clarified the mode as well as process of unloading instability of thrust fault in Yima mining area. Wang et al. (2021) proposed a mechanical model to calculate the stress distribution on fault surfaces and illustrate the fault slip characteristics.

However, the traditional research methods can not accurately obtain the multi-physical field’s evolution of complex fault geology in three dimensions. The main limitation for accurate prediction of coal bursts is a lack of understanding of geological conditions and the unknown evolution process of multi-physical fields. With the rapid development of information and communication technology in recent years, the industrial digital transformation has been accelerated by increasing modern industries. Digitization refers to introducing complex and variable information in the physical world into the computer and forming identifiable, storable and computable data using the information system, various sensors, machine vision and communication technologies. These data are used to perform the unified processing, analysis, visualization and application (Belk 2013; Yoo et al. 2010). In the application of digital technologies, the digital twin system provides a new approach for the reconstruction and visualization of multi-physical fields of complex fault structures. Moreover, this system developed based on the digital approach is a new generation of information technology and covers the entire cycle, the entire process, and all elements of the project, acting as a bridge and link between the physical and information world. This system includes three modules: physical model, virtual model, and information mutual feed interface between physical and virtual model (Tao et al. 2018; Li et at. 2019). The conceptual diagram is shown in Fig. 1. The digital twin system provides users with real-time dynamic visual models based on the data drive, allowing users to have a profound and detailed understanding of the current health state of the system, and assisting users to make decisions through data analysis, iterative optimization and reverse control.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Conceptual diagram of digital twin system

Digital twin system is a widely used technology and system in aerospace, advanced manufacturing, engineering and construction. Airbus uses the digital twin system in its aircraft assembly process to increase automation and reduce lead times. Siemens developed a system model of the manufacturing process based on the concept of a digital twin system, and realized the product design and the virtualization as well as digitization of the manufacturing process by simulating all the links of the production process through simulation. The American company ANSYS Inc, which is well-known for finite element simulation, has proposed a digital twin simulation scheme based on finite element simulation and system-level simulation as the ultimate goal (Tao et al. 2019a, b). At present, the digital twin system is mainly concentrated in underground space engineering, bridge engineering and water conservancy engineering. Shim et al. (2019) developed a three-dimensional (3D) digital twin model for the maintenance of prestressed concrete bridges based on 3D information management and a digital image inspection system. Kaewunruen and Lian (2019) created a full life cycle sustainable digital twin system for urban underground rails. Lu and Brilakis (2019) used a digital twin system to address the issues that the existing digital model of the reinforced concrete bridge could not optimally restore the bridge state.

Digital twin system is a simulation process that integrates multi-physical fields, multi-scales, and multi-probabilities. Its significant feature is the processing of massive data. The method to realize the fidelity of the data-driven model and the fusion of multi-source data is crucial to the model reconstruction. Numerous investigations have been performed to study data operation. To improve the accuracy of the estimation results, Zakerzadeh et al. (2018) used a Kalman filter to process the numerical noise input by the sensor to improve the accuracy of the estimation results. Tao et al. (2018) reported that the fidelity of the digital twin model is constrained by geometry, physics and behavior rules. Zhang et al. (2021) studied the data acquisition method of machining process of computer numerical control (CNC) machine tools and established the spatial–temporal mapping model corresponding to machining process data and part processing position. Li et al. (2021a) proposed a parallel configurable acquisition method of multi-source heterogeneous data based on field programmable gate array (FPGA) to ensure real-time data acquisition.

To solve the problem of multi-source data fusion, Guo et al. (2009) proposed a multi-data source information fusion fault diagnosis method based on improved Dempster evidence theory. Wang et al. (2020a) proposed a method for dynamic data-driven modeling and simulation of digital twin systems. The physical model and sensors in cyber-physical system (CPS) were modeled using random finite sets, and the prediction and correction process based on the Bayesian inference supported the data-driven simulation model operation. Ge et al. (2020) proposed the digital thread method to manage the information flow of the digital twin mining face system. The data of the information flow were divided into periodic data, random data and sudden data for modeling processing to ensure the data driven and stable operation of the digital twin mining face.

In conclusion, digital twin system has been widely used in aerospace, advanced manufacturing, and other aspects, and scholars have reported considerable achievements in their scientific research. Although a few studies have reported some conceptual design in coal mining engineering (Ge et al. 2020; Mao et al. 2021), the application of digital twin systems in the geological model reconstruction in the underground coal mining industry has not been reported in the open literature. The majority of digital twin system introductions in mining engineering are focused on designing mining machinery systems such as coal mining machines, coal resource transport systems, and monitoring systems (Shi et al. 2020; Sweta et al. 2019; Li et al. 2021b). The accurate reconstruction of large-scale multi-physical field models in the space of complex geological structures is the foundation of coal mining safety. Although some achievements have been made in multi-source data fusion, the collection and transition of multi-physical field data pertaining to fault geological conditions are still the key steps in model reconstruction studies. Thus, this study proposes a methodology for the digital reconstruction of complex fault structures in coal mines and facilitates the realization of the collection and transmission of multi-physical field data, based on the concept of establishing virtual models in the digital twin system.

2.Theoretical foundation of the interpolation algorithm

The major concern of digital reconstruction of fault structure is identifying a method to realize the multi-physical field data visualization in three dimensions, such as the geometric structure, stress distribution, and strain variation. To create a detailed visual model, obtaining accurate data for all positions the model is theoretically necessary. However, owing to acquisition method and cost constraints, only a few discrete and limited datasets reflecting distribution characteristics are obtained. Therefore, the continuous distribution and evolution of multi-physical field data should be obtained through spatial interpolation. Current interpolation applications are primarily focused on one and two dimensions, with the corresponding attributes being interpolated based on plane coordinates. For example, Feng et al. (2019) selected the inverse distance weight to interpolate the stratum elevation to generate geological entities. Xu et al. (2021) proposed a method of gas concentration field reconstruction based on a spatial–temporal semi-variogram. Li and Ye (2021) developed a new spatial interpolation method considering the influence of terrain to interpolate rainfall information. However, because the aforementioned methods cannot reflect the attribute distribution of 3D space, a 3D multi-physical field interpolation method is proposed to realize the digital reconstruction of multi-physical fields of fault structure mines. The proposed method is applicable to any data in the multi-physical fields investigated in this study. Using strain data as an example, the specific implementation steps can be divided into the following four steps.

Step 1: Arrangement of monitoring sensors. Several planes with number of k are considered from the z direction of the studied model, and a set of strain sensors with m rows and n columns are arranged on each plane, as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Arrangement of monitoring sensors used for the interpolation algorithm

Step 2: Calculation of strain distribution in one dimension. The Lagrangian interpolation is a polynomial interpolation method. Its implementation principle involves construction of a higher order polynomial through multiple sampling points to predict unknown points. Owing to its neat structure and convenience of characterization, it has been widely used in linear interpolation (Higham 2004; Arkadii 2020). To construct the Lagrangian function, an interpolation basis function is constructed first as follows:

$$l_{i} (x) = \frac{{(x - x_{1} ) \cdots (x - x_{i - 1} )(x - x_{i + 1} ) \cdots (x - x_{n} )}}{{(x_{i} - x_{1} ) \cdots (x_{i} - x_{i - 1} )(x_{i} - x_{i + 1} ) \cdots (x_{i} - x_{n} )}}$$
(1)

where li(x) is the interpolation basis function along the x direction and xi is the x-coordinate of the i point that has been monitored, iϵ[1, n].

Based on Eq. (1), the row strain interpolation function is obtained by fitting the strain components measured in each row of monitoring sensors on the k plane and can be written as follows:

$$\varepsilon (x)\left| {_{{y = y_{j} }} } \right. = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {l_{i} (x)} \varepsilon_{{x_{i} }}$$
(2)

where yj is the y-coordinate of arbitrary row, jϵ[1, m] and \(\varepsilon_{{x_{i} }}\) is the strain value at xi point in j row of k plane. Similarly, the column strain interpolation function is obtained by fitting the strain components measured in each column of monitoring sensors on the k plane and can be written as follows:

$$\varepsilon (y)\left| {_{{x = x_{i} }} } \right. = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^{m} {l_{j} (x)} \varepsilon_{{y_{j} }}$$
(3)

Based on the calculated results obtained using Eqs. (2) and (3), the strain distribution in one dimension along x and y directions can be obtained, respectively.

Step 3: Calculation of strain distribution in two dimensions. The Shepard interpolation is a plane interpolation method, and it is called the inverse distance weighted method (Tomczak 1988; Chen et al. 2015). The weighted average value of the known point coordinates is used to calculate the interpolation point assignment value, and the weight function is defined as inversely proportional to the distance. Based on the Shepard interpolation method and strain interpolation functions obtained in one dimension, the strain interpolation functions of arbitrary plane can be written as follows:

$$\varepsilon (x,y) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{\sum\nolimits_{i,j = 1}^{n} {\varepsilon_{ij} \left( {\frac{1}{{r_{i} }}} \right)^{u} } }}{{\sum\nolimits_{i,j = 1}^{n} { \left( {\frac{1}{{r_{i} }}} \right)^{u} } }}} & {r_{i} \ne 0} \\ {\varepsilon_{ij} } & {r_{i} = 0} \\ \end{array} } \right.$$
(4)

where \(r_{i} = \sqrt {(x - x_{i} )^{2} + (y - y_{i} )^{2} }\) is the distance from the monitored points to the interpolation points; εij is the strain values at the intersection of row j and column i of arbitrary plane; and u is the weight index.

Step 4: Calculation of strain distribution in three dimensions. In this study, the one- and two-dimensional interpolation have been used in an arbitrary plane. The Lagrangian interpolation method will be used to perform 3D interpolation based on several interpolated planes. Therefore, 3D interpolation can be combined with two-dimensional and one-dimensional interpolation. The 3D space is divided into several horizontal layers in the vertical direction. First, each interpolated plane has been determined as the scatter group in z direction. Then, Lagrangian interpolation is performed along the z direction of the interpolated planes. Based on the aforementioned method, the 3D strain function of the studied model can be determined as follows:

$$\varepsilon (x,y,z)\left| {_{{(x = x_{i} ,y = y_{j} )}} } \right. = \sum\limits_{q = 1}^{k} {l_{q} (x,y)\varepsilon_{{z_{q} }} }$$
(5)

where lq(x,y) is the interpolation basis function in z direction, qϵ[1, k] and \(\varepsilon_{{z_{q} }}\) is the strain value at plane k.

3.Digital reconstruction scheme of fault structures

The digital reconstruction does not refer to a simple construction of the fault geometry. However, it is a comprehensive reproduction of multi-physical field data of fault structure. The digital reconstruction scheme is expected to have the following four steps.

3.1 Collection and fidelity of multi-physical field data of fault structures

Multi-physical field data of fault structures include the fault geometry data, composition and parameters of overburdened rock masses, in situ stress distribution, and boundary conditions. Notably, the fidelity of in situ stress and boundary conditions is crucial in the digital reconstruction of fault structures (Wang et al. 2020b). In this study, considering the high cost of data collection, the large scale of the fault structures in underground coal mines, and the uncertainty of complex geological conditions, a physical model with the fault structures under the laboratory environment is initially constructed. Figure 3 presents the schematic of multi-physical field data collection and fidelity in a laboratory setting.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic of multi-physical field data collection and fidelity

The collection of multi-physical field data is mainly based on the geophysical monitoring methods, including seismic high-power geological radar, wave advanced detection, transient electromagnetic detection, and the borehole stress relief method for in situ stress. High-power geological radar can detect and obtain the location coordinates, fault throw, and dip angle of the complex fault structures from the ground surface to an underground roadway or a mining face. These geometrical parameters are the main data for the geometric morphology fidelity of the fault structures under laboratory conditions. The wave advanced detection method is used to determine the composition of overburdened rock masses and as well as to provide data for the fidelity of rock strata distribution. Transient electromagnetic detection can confirm the hydrological environment near the faults and determine whether water fidelity should be implemented within the physical model of the fault structures. The borehole stress relief method is the main method to detect in situ stress around the fault structures.

In this study, based on the borehole stress relief method, a new dynamic stress monitoring system will be developed. This system can monitor in situ stress, mining-induced stress, and tectonic stress. This system comprises borehole stress sensors, a data terminal integrator, data analysis software, and image processing software, as shown in Fig. 4. The boundary conditions of the fault physical model can be established in the laboratory using detection data from the dynamic stress monitoring system. The fidelity of the stress boundary condition is realized by developing an adaptive boundary pressure propulsion device, establishing a data interface with the stress monitoring system, and autonomously applying a stress boundary condition similar to that of the in-situ stress of the coal roadway.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Dynamic stress monitoring system

Based on the deep engineering failure simulation system, the overburden rock mining-induced stress monitoring system, fault tectonic stress monitoring system, overburden rock displacement monitoring system, dynamic scanning system of the ground-penetrating radar for the internal structure of the overburden rock, and full-information acoustic emission signal analysis system are connected (Zuo et al. 2019). The above systems are used to collect data from overlying rock mining stress field, overlying rock movement displacement field and fault sliding stress field, which serves as the foundation for digital reconstruction.

Although the more sensors are installed on the physical model with a definite size, the more accurate the monitoring results will be. Installing excess sensors is not recommended. The presence of numerous embedded sensors will cause stress concentration in the physical model, influencing the experimental results. Therefore, the sensor layout must be determined based on the test conditions.

3.2 Transmission of multi-physical field data

The collection of multi-physical field data poses a challenge to the massive data transmission in the physical model. Ensuring the efficient transmission of massive amounts of data is a critical step toward realizing the digital reconstruction of complex fault structures. The following two modules should be prioritized for efficient transmission of multi-physical field data from physical model to digital model: the data interface module for real-time data interaction and the parallel algorithms module for data sharing, fusion, and integration. Figure 5 presents the process of multi-physical field data transmission.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Multi-physical field data transmission

The first module is to be established as the data interface for dynamic real-time interaction of multi-physical field data for a physical model to the database. Using a high-speed, high- stability, and low-latency data transfer protocol, real-time dynamic data of multi-physical field sensors, such as geometric shape, displacement field, stress field, and energy field, are extracted from physical models in a unified manner. The second module will be developed as a high-performance parallel algorithm of data dynamic sharing, fusion, and integration that will be used to transmit information from the physical model to the digital space. The algorithm can automatically identify data types, automatically coordinate the allocation of resource nodes, reduce data redundancy, and ensure the high efficiency as well as timeliness of data transmission.

3.3 Multi-physical field data normalization

The normalization of multi-physical field data mainly refers to the generalization, organization, coding, and storage of stress, strain, and acoustic emission data, and the process is shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Schematic of multi-physical field data normalization

The data generalization is to preprocess the data, realize the rapid extraction of data features, and convert the original data of different formats into the unified format. The data organization is to assign coordinate information to data from different sources to form the standardization of spatial–temporal information, check data quality, and filter data that do not meet requirements. The data coding catalogs the processed data, designs the logical structure according to the attributes and characteristics of the data, correlate each data with serial numbers, and pack the file data into blocks after encoding to prepare for data storage. The purpose of data storage is to integrate processed data into a database so that it can be managed, transmitted and extracted uniformly. After completing the preceding four steps, the data structure database of mining history and operation state in full-time domain, full factor, and global evolution process is established. The fields in the table contain sensors number, coordinates, arrival times and physical field attribute information, as shown in Fig. 6.

3.4 Digital model reconstruction of fault structures

Based on the collection, transmission, and normalization of the multi-physical field data, the digital reconstruction of fault structure is the digitalization of multi-physical dynamic data, rather than the traditional numerical modeling. The fault structure digital model includes fault images, stress data, displacement data, drilling data, and energy data. Multi-physical field data are correlated, fused, rendered, and presented in an integrated manner via the modular integration platform, providing people with a complete observation perspective in time and space. Aiming at the complex structure location that is difficult to observe in the physical system, the problem can be solved through multi-source data interpolation and inverse fitting; hence, the system can support the in-depth observation of the operating state of the system. The system can track real-time data, historical data, and the operational status of the physical model to form a low-latency and high-fidelity mirror relationship. As illustrated in Fig. 7, the digital reconstruction of fault structure can be divided into three steps.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Major processes of digital reconstruction of fault structures

Step 1: Based on the fault structure parameters and borehole data extracted from the database, the original data or discrete data interpolation and fitting method are derived to reconstruct the 3D visual static geological model.

Step 2: Based on the collected multi-physical field data, the two-dimensional and 3D interpolation fitting algorithm of complex geophysical field is studied to restore the unmonitored multi-physical field data distribution.

Step 3: According to the coordinate and time information, the interpolated multi-physical field data is synchronously restored to the static geological model and the 3D cloud map is automatically generated to realize the visualization of multi-physical fields in the mining process of the mining face.

The fault structures model can generate dynamic 3D cloud images and have the functions of zooming, rotating, cutting at any position, and data extraction, which is convenient for users to observe the target object in depth.

4.The key scientific issues to be resolved

4.1 Fidelity of multi-physical field data

Considering the complex geological conditions, a physical model of the fault structures is explored and constructed under laboratory conditions. The fidelity of multi-physical field data is primarily determined using the fault structures geometry, overburdened rock mass composition, in situ stress distribution, and boundary conditions. Therefore, in this study, high-sensitivity and high-precision sensors, an adaptive boundary pressure propulsion device, and a multi-scale simulation test platform are developed. The high-precision sensors can monitor the in situ stress data in real time, and the adaptive boundary pressure propulsion device can realize the adaptive pressure on the boundary of the model according to the collected stress data. The structure of the platform is shown in Fig. 8.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Structure of multi-scale simulation test platform

The experimental platform comprises a base, left and right plates, and an upper roof. The side plates and roof are outfitted with multiple evenly distributed pressure heads, allowing for the model's seamless loading under computer and servo-hydraulic control system control. The upper and right plates are free to move, allowing for multi-scale modeling. A new dynamic stress transmission algorithm is developed to automatically identify, filter the error data, and convert the boundary loads, which can realize the transmission and fidelity of the boundary stress data.

4.2 Normalized programming of multi-source data

Digital reconstruction of fault structure requires effective fusion of multi-physical field data. However, owing to differences in data collection sensors, time scale, and error accuracy, the normalization of multi-physical filed data is the basement of data transmission and centralized presentation. Therefore, investigating the normalization programming algorithm of multi-source heterogeneous data is critical. The algorithm's main idea is mainly embodied in four steps: generalization, organization, coding, and storage. The detailed process is shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Normalized programming of multi-source data

Based on a parallel algorithm, a normalized algorithm is developed to extract characteristic parameters of multi-source data, filter redundant data and distribute coordinate information of monitoring points automatically. The data logical structure is designed based on the data relationship. Finally, the database with multi-source data normalized structure is created. The normalized data can be managed, transmitted, and extracted uniformly through the database, providing a data basis for future digital reconstruction.

5.Preliminary attempt on digitalization of fault structure

5.1 Geological conditions of the Da’anshan coal mine

Aiming at the visualization of fault structure, scholars have conducted a lot of research. For example, Zhang et al. (2009) proposed a modeling method of complex geological faults in geotechnical engineering based on element reconstruction. Yuan et al. (2015) introduced the visualization method of fault structure based on volume rendering technology in three dimensions. Through the investigation of the existing published literature, the existing geological models are static and cannot be monitored in the full-time domain.

In this study, according to the geological background of Da’anshan coal mine in the mining area of western Beijing, China, a preliminary attempt is conducted to reconstruct a digital model of the fault and fold structures using this methodology. The following tectonic description is based on the previous geological survey studies (Wang et al. 2017). Da’anshan coal mine is located in Fangshan District in Beijing and has a length of 9 km along the strike direction and a width of 2–4 km in the dip direction. Da’ anshan coal mine is excavated in the south limb of the Miaoanling–Tiaojishan syncline with the Jiulongshan syncline to the east, the Fuping anticline to the south, and the Baihuashan syncline in the west, as shown in Fig. 10.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Schematic of geological structures in the mining area of western Beijing

Owing to compressive stress, numerous compound folds are generated within the Da’anshan coal mine, regarded as the primary tectonic features of the mine. The primary fold structures are the Dahanling overturned anticline, which has dip angles ranging from 10° to 90°. The Dahanling syncline, has dip angles ranging from 50° to 90°. Figure 11 presents the main section view and side section view of a tectonic structure in Da’anshan coal mine. Subsidiary fold structures are well developed in the axis and both limbs of the primary fold, and these smaller folds are accompanied with numerous fractures in both the strike and dip directions. There are many thrust faults in Da’anshan coal mine that mainly result from horizontal compressive stress. These faults have a maximum drop height of 150 m and a maximum dip angle of 77°.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Tectonic sections of the Da’anshan coal mine: a Main section view; b Side section view

5.2 Establishment on the digital model of geological structures

Based on the geological data such as borehole, geological section, and contour line collected in-site, the applicability of various interpolation algorithms in the mining area is compared and analyzed. Finally, because of its low error, the Kriging algorithm is selected as the best method.

The interpolation method was used to encrypt the elevation data of different layers, and the data were imported into Midas to create DEM surfaces of the ground and strata. Based on the geological profile and geological topographic map, the main geological parameters of the fault, such as spatial position, length, drop, dip angle, and fault plane were extracted. Finally, according to the generated DEM plane, fault plane, and boundary constraint, the block model is cut to build a 3D visual static geological model of fault structure.

To verify the effectiveness of the 3D visual digital geological model, the original geological profile and borehole data are combined to conduct a comparative study with the 3D visual digital model, as shown in Fig. 12. The 3D visual digital geological model constructed in this study roughly comprises geological information expressed from the main section view and side section view, confirming the accuracy of the modeling.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Digital reconstruction results of tectonic structures in the Da’anshan coal mine

Through the normalization processing of the collected multi-physical field data, a structured database is established in the database software SQL. Based on the Lagrangian and Shepard interpolation methods, the 3D interpolation fitting processing of the data was realized. In this study, the in-situ stress data from the Da’anshan coal mine were used to validate the proposed interpolation algorithm and the calculated and measured in situ stress values of four monitoring points at different depths were selected for error analysis and comparison. The results are listed in Table 1. The error is equal to the calculated stress minus the measured stress.

Table 1 Interpolation algorithm verification of in situ horizontal and vertical stress in the Da’anshan coal mine

Monitoring point No.

Buried depth (m)

Horizontal stress

Vertical stress

Measured (MPa)

Calculated (MPa)

Error (MPa)

Percentage (%)

Measured (MPa)

Calculated (MPa)

Error (MPa)

Percentage (%)

1

465

19.10

19.27

0.17

0.89

12.40

12.52

0.12

0.97

2

510

20.50

20.32

 − 0.18

 − 0.88

12.20

12.11

 − 0.09

 − 0.74

3

580

22.60

22.76

0.16

0.71

12.60

12.68

0.08

0.63

4

672

26.30

26.22

 − 0.08

 − 0.30

13.50

13.43

 − 0.07

 − 0.52

The absolute value of interpolation error percentage can be ensured to be smaller than 1%, which verified the effectiveness of the interpolation algorithm. After encryption, the stress and displacement data were restored to the corresponding positions based on the coordinates. As shown in Fig. 12, by assigning attributes to the mesh, horizontal and vertical stress and displacement contours are obtained to enable visualization of the fault structure geometry and multi-physical fields. In addition, the horizontal and vertical stress in the 3D visual digital model is compared with the monitored in situ stress data to verify the effectiveness of multi-physical field data restoration in a 3D visual digital model, as shown in Fig. 13. The horizontal and vertical stress values in the model at different depths agree well with the monitoring data, proving the efficacy of stress data recovery.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Digital reconstruction verification: a Horizontal stress; b Vertical stress

In terms of the digital model construction, scholars are still constantly finding out effective methods and approaches. At present, 3D geological exploration technology is now widely used in interpreting complex geological conditions. For example, Ahlborn et al. (2014) presented a detailed seismic analysis of a set of complex overburdened rock stratum. Liu et al. (2020) used 3D seismic exploration technology to explore the distribution of overlying fault structures and collapsed columns. However, owing to the monitored data source being too simple to construct a geologic model, the interpretation accuracy is to be limited and the details of geological structures cannot be better presented. Scholars began to explore the method of multi-source data to establish models. Manzi et al. (2014) constructed the model by integrating 3D seismic and exploration borehole datasets. Casallas-Moreno et al. (2021) combined seismic sections and lithological columns of drilled hole to characterize the volcanic rock masses. Although there are continuous developments of multi-approach modeling, the combination of drilling data and seismic exploration data to construct the digital model is still the main approach.

According to the preliminary attempt on digitalization of the fault structure of Da’anshan coal mine in western Beijing, China, a 3D visual digital model of faults and folds with in situ stress are accurately reconstructed by the methodology proposed in this study. In this 3D visual digital model, obtaining as many multiple sources as possible for the geological data is the main approach to achieve the collection and fidelity of multi-physical filed data. The multiple sources of monitored data in this study is referred to seismic high-power geological radar data, wave advanced data, transient electromagnetic detection boreholes data, and so on. The digital reconstruction method proposed in this study can effectively fuse multi-source data through normalized algorithm. These structured data sources can better restore geological information through multi-source data fusion and interpolation fitting, which lays a foundation for in situ recovery of stress and displacement data.

6.Conclusions and prospects

  1. (1)

    The first key scientific issue for digital reconstruction of fault structures is to ensure the fidelity of the multi-physical field data. To collect multi-physical field data around the zone of fault structures, seismic high-power geological radar, wave advanced detection, transient electromagnetic detection, and borehole stress relief method for in situ stress are used. To apply the fidelity stress boundary conditions, a new dynamic stress monitoring system with an adaptive boundary pressure propulsion device is used.

  2. (2)

    The second key scientific issue for digital reconstruction of fault structure is to realize normalized programming of multi-source data. This study develops a normalized algorithm to extract characteristic parameters of multi-source data, and filter redundant data, and automatically distribute coordinate information of monitoring points based on a parallel algorithm and interpolated calculation of strain distribution in three dimensions. According to the data relationship, this study designs the data logical structure and establishes the multi-source data normalized structure database, which provides a data basis for later digital reconstruction.

  3. (3)

    According to the geological conditions in Da’anshan coal mine in the mining area of western Beijing, China, a full-scale and 3D visual digital model which can restore the fault geological structure and the stress and displacement distribution is established. The work discussed in this study was limited to the development of a digital fault model and the representation of stress and displacement distributions in static. The related data transmission and programming to realize dynamic data visualization need to be further studied.

References

[1] Ahlborn M, Stemmerik L, Kalsto TK (2014) 3D seismic analysis of karstified interbedded carbonates and evaporites, Lower Permian Gipsdalen Group, Loppa High, southwestern Barents Sea. Mar Pet Geol 56:16–33
[2] Arkadii S (2020) Algebra for applications. Springer, Cham, pp 1–39
[3] Belk RW (2013) Extended self in a digital world. J Consum Res 40(3):477–500
[4] Casallas-Moreno KL, González-Escobar M, Gómez-Arias E, Mastache-Román EA, Gallegos-Castillo CA, González-Fernández A (2021) Analysis of subsurface structures based on seismic and gravimetric exploration methods in the Las Tres Vírgenes volcanic complex and geothermal field, Baja California Sur. Mex Geotherm 92:102026
[5] Chen P, Deng F, Liu ST (2015) Research on 3D spatial property interpolation method. Comput Knowl Technol 11(7):235–239
[6] Chen SJ, Li ZY, Ren KQ, Feng F, Xia ZG (2020) Experimental study on development process of reverse fault in coal measures strata and law of stress evolution in hanging wall strata. J Min Saf Eng 37(02):366–375
[7] Feng B, Chen MT, Yue DD, Li ST, Jia XF, Song D (2019) Comparison of 3D geological modeling based on two different interpolation methods. J Jilin Univ (earth Sci Ed) 49(04):1200–1208
[8] Ge SR, Zhang F, Wang S (2020) Digital twin for smart coal mining workface Technological frame and construction. J China Coal Soc 45(6):1925–1936
[9] Guo CX, Peng MW, Liu Y (2009) Novel Approach for Fault diagnosis of the power Grid with information fusion of multi-data Resources. Proc CSEE 29(31):1–7
[10] Higham NJ (2004) The numerical stability of barycentric Lagrangian interpolation. IMA J Numer Anal 24(4):547–556
[11] Jang YD, Pan YS, Jiang FX, Dou LM, Ju Y (2014) State of the art review r mechanism and prevention of coal bumps in China. J China Coal Soc 39(2):205–213
[12] Kaewunruen S, Lian Q (2019) Digital twin aided sustainability-based lifecycle management for railway turnout systems. J Clean Prod 228:1537–1551
[13] Li HQ, Ye AZ (2021) Spatial interpolation method of precipitation based on topographic weighting. Eng J Wuhan Univ 54(01):28–37
[14] Li X, Liu X, Wan XX (2019) Overview of digital twin application and safe development. J Syst Simul 31(03):385–392
[15] Li ZP, Zou FX, Su YH, Zhang CZ, Tao F (2021a) Configurable acquisition method of multi-source heterogeneous data based on FPGA. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 27(04):1008–1020
[16] Li SH, Xie JC, Ren F, Zhang X, Wang XW, Wang BB (2021b) Virtual straightening of scraper conveyor based on the position and attitude solution of industrial robot model. Int J Coal Sci Technol 8:1149–1170
[17] Liu J, Zhao W, Han BW (2020) Application of high-precision 3D seismic exploration technology in Huainan mining area. Coal Geol Explor 48(6):8–14
[18] Lu RD, Brilakis I (2019) Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters. Autom Constr 105:1–16
[19] Manzi MSD, Hein KA, Durrheim RJ, King N (2014) The Ventersdorp Contact Reef model in the Kloof Gold Mine as derived from 3D seismics, geological mapping and exploration borehole datasets. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 66:97–113
[20] Mao SJ (2020) Development of coal geological information technologies in China. Int J Coal Sci Technol 7:320–328
[21] Mao SJ, Lu SM, Li CL, Chen HZ, Zhang PP, Fan HJ, Li XC, Chen JC (2021) Key technology and system of adaptive coal cutting in transparent intelligent fully mechanized coal mining lace based on precise geodetic coordinates. J China Coal Soc 1–16.
[22] Mark C (2016) Coal bursts in the deep longwall mines of the United States. Int J Coal Sci Technol 3(1):1–9
[23] Mark C, Gauna M (2020) Pillar design and coal burst experience in Utah Book Cliffs longwall operations. Int J Coal Sci Technol 31(01):33–41
[24] Pan YS, Dai LP (2021) Theoretical formula of rock burst in coal mines. J China Coal Soc 46(03):789–799
[25] Pan YS, Li ZH, Zhang MT (2003) Distribution, type, mechanism and prevention of rock burst in china. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 22(11):1844–1851
[26] Qi QX, Li YZ, Zhao SK (2019) Discussion on the mechanism and control of coal bump among mine group. J China Coal Soc 44(1):141–150
[27] Shi HB, Xie JC, Wang XW, Li JL, Ge X (2020) An operation optimization method of a fully mechanized coal mining face based on semi-physical virtual simulation. Int J Coal Sci Technol 7(1):147–163
[28] Shim CS, Dang NS, Lon S (2019) Development of a bridge maintenance system for prestressed concrete bridges using 3D digital twin model. Struct Infrastruct Eng 15(10):1319–1332
[29] Sweta B, Sutapa P, Sanghamitra D, Gautam P, Kumar JD (2019) Fire monitoring in coal mines using wireless underground sensor network and interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller. Int J Coal Sci Technol 6(2):274–285
[30] Tao F, Liu WR, Liu JH (2018) Digital twin and its potential application exploration. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 24(1):1–18
[31] Tao F, Liu WR, Zhang M (2019a) Five-dimension digital twin model and its ten applications. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 25(1):1–18
[32] Tao F, Ma X, Hu TL (2019b) Research on digital twin standard system. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 25(10):2405–2418
[33] Tomczak M (1988) Spatial interpolation and its uncertainty using automated anisotropic Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW). J Geogr Inf Decis Anal 2(2):18–30
[34] Wang HW, Jiang YD, Xue S, Pang XF, Lin ZN, Deng DX (2017) Investigation of intrinsic and external factors contributing to the occurrence of coal bumps in the mining area of Western Beijing. China Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(4):1033–1047
[35] Wang HW, Shao MM, Wang G (2019) Characteristics of stress evolution on the thrust fault plane during the coal mining. J China Coal Soc 44(8):2318–2327
[36] Wang P, Yang M, Zhu JC, Ju RS, Li G (2020a) Dynamic data driven modeling and simulation method for digital twin. Syst Eng Electron 42(12):2779–2786
[37] Wang HW, Shi RM, Deng DX, Jiang YD, Wang G, Gong WL (2020b) Characteristic of stress evolution on fault surface and coal bursts mechanism during the extraction of longwall face in Yima mining area. China J Struct Geol 136:104071
[38] Wang HW, Shi RM, Song JQ, Tian Z, Deng DX, Jiang YD (2021) Mechanical model for the calculation of stress distribution on fault surface during the underground coal seam mining. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 144:104765
[39] Xu MX, Miu YZ, Du YC, Guo YH (2021) Reconstruction of gas concentration field based on spatio-temporal expansion model. J China Univ Min Technol 50(4):658–666
[40] Yoo YJ, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf Syst Res 21(4):724–735
[41] Yuan D, Liu RC, Yuan XR (2015) Seismic visualization. J Comput-Aided Des Comput Graph 27(1):36–45
[42] Yuan L, Jiang YD, He XQ, Dou LM, Zhao YX (2018) Research progress of precise risk accurate dentification and monitoring early warning on typical dynamic disasters in coal mine. J China Coal Soc 43(2):306–318
[43] Zakerzadeh MR, Gerdefaramarzi MS, Bozorg M (2018) Parameter estimation of an SMA actuator model using an extended Kalman filter. Mechatronics 50(4):148–159
[44] Zhang YT, Xiao M, Zuo SY (2009) Methodology for modeling of complex geological faults in geotechnical engineering based on element reconstruction. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 28(09):1848–1855
[45] Zhang NB, Zhao SK, Zhao Y (2020) Mechanism of thrust fault rupture causing by unloading effect. J China Coal Soc 45(5):1671–1680
[46] Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Xia HW, Wu HB, Zhang DH (2021) Monitoring and visual analysis of process data based on time-position mapping. China Mech Eng 11(01):1–10
[47] Zuo JP, Wang JT, Jiang YQ (2019) Macro/meso failure behavior of surrounding rock in deep roadway and its control technology. Int J Coal Sci Technol 6(3):301–319

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, H., Wang, Z., Jiang, Y. et al. New approach for the digital reconstruction of complex mine faults and its application in mining.Int J Coal Sci Technol 9, 43 (2022).
  • Received

    30 June 2021

  • Accepted

    24 April 2022

  • DOI

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-022-00506-z

  • Share this article

    Copy to clipboard

For Authors

Explore