The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal. It focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development, serving as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues.
Coverage includes original research articles, new developments, case studies and critical reviews in all aspects of scientific and engineering research on coal, coal utilizations and coal mining. Among the broad topics receiving attention are coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology; coal mining theory, technology and engineering; coal processing, utilization and conversion; coal mining environment and reclamation and related aspects.
The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs so authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.
The journal operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous.
A forum for new research findings, case studies and discussion of important challenges in coal science and mining development
Offers an international perspective on coal geology, coal mining, technology and engineering, coal processing, utilization and conversion, coal mining environment and reclamation and more
Published with the China Coal Society
Research Article
Open Access
Published: 11 July 2024
0 Accesses
International Journal of Coal Science & Technology Volume 11, article number 60, (2024)
1.
School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Anhui Key Laboratory of Coal Clean Conversion and High Valued Utilization, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan, China
Coal pitch, an important by-product in the coal coking industry with a high output, is a low-cost and high-carbon yield precursor for the manufacturing of high-value carbon materials. Herein, N/O co-doped carbon fiber (CFCP), fabricated by electrospinning using pre-oxidized coal pitch as the precursor, was employed as the sulfur host for Li-S batteries. The presence of more pyrrolic N and graphic N in CFCP than carbon fiber made from polyacrylonitrile benefits the adsorption of lithium polysulfide and the battery’s life. Sulphur-CFCP cathode (S@CFCP) exhibited excellent specific capacity and cyclability, with a specific capacity of 701.1 mAh/g and a low capacity decay rate of 0.088% per cycle over 200 cycles at 2.0 C, respectively. The high ion diffusion rate, low charge transfer resistance, and effective conversion of lithium polysulfides enable the high electrochemical performance of S@CFCP.
Li-S batteries are promising candidates for advanced battery systems due to their high theoretical energy density (2600 Wh/kg) and specific capacity (1675 mAh/g), as well as the low cost of sulfur. However, the sluggish shuttling effect of LiPSs and volume expansion of the cathode during the cycle generally result in rapid capacity fading and low Coulombic efficiency, thus hindering the practical application of this battery system. Owing to their high conductivity and excellent sulfur-loading ability, carbon materials including carbon fibers, carbon spheres, and carbon nanosheets, have been demonstrated to be excellent sulfur host materials. Among them, carbon fibers have received great attention due to their adjustable structures and compositions (Sun et al. 2022). Electrospinning is an efficient technique for constructing high-surface-area carbon fibers with plentiful functional groups and active sites, which is desirable for sulfur host materials of Li-S batteries. Generally, precursors such as polyacrylonitrile (PAN) (Xing et al. 2021), polyvinylidene fluoride (He et al. 2021), polymethyl methacrylate (Jin et al. 2022), and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) (Xie et al. 2020) are employed to prepare porous carbon fibers, which are highly expensive and cannot meet the huge market demand.
Coal tar pitch, a high-yield by-product in the coal coking industry, is structurally rich in aromatic structures and heteroatoms (N, S, etc.), making it an economical and promising feedstock to synthesize heteroatom-doped porous carbon materials (Zhuang et al. 2021). Li et al. demonstrated that pitch extracted from coal residue liquefaction can be used to fabricate electrospun carbon nanofibers nonwovens, which show excellent rate capacity and high power density (Li et al. 2022). Using coal tar pitch as the raw material, Zhang et al. successfully prepared hierarchically porous carbon that exhibited fast and high-lux lightweight storage (Zhang Md, Qu et al. 2023). Wang et al. synthesized carbon materials with hierarchical porosity via a one-step carbonization activation method using coal tar pitch as the carbon source and KOH as the activator. The as-prepared multi-level porous carbon material with 90.5% micropores exhibited a specific capacitance of 475 F/g at a current density of 0.5 A/g (Wang Zh et al. 2023). Although coal tar pitch exhibits advantages in preparing porous carbon materials, it remains challenging to use coal pitch to manufacture carbon fibers because of the strong π-π conjugate in the structure of coal pitch. At present, numerous studies have chosen PAN as the main precursor of porous carbon fibers, while little literature focused on coal pitch (Zhang Ys et al. 2022; Zhujd, Cheng et al. 2022). To reduce the cost and cope with demand, it is attractive to employ modified coal pitch as the feedstock of porous carbon fibers for Li-S battery system.
Herein, porous N/O co-doped carbon fibers (CFCP) were successfully constructed from coal pitch using an electrospinning method. As references, carbon fibers derived from PAN, and PVP (CFPAN and CFPVP) were also fabricated. The morphology, structure, and composition of these carbon fibers were investigated using various characterizations. The electrochemical performance of these carbon fibers as sulfur hosts in the Li–S battery system was compared and their electrochemical mechanisms were revealed. This study provides valuable insights into the engineering of coal pitch-base porous carbon fiber with high Li-S battery performance and a new path toward high value-added utilization of coal pitch.
The coal pitch used was obtained from Ma’anshan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. Coal Coke Company It contains 93.34% C, 4.01% H, 1.03% N, 0.43% S, and 3.19% O. PVP, H2SO4, N, N-dimethylformamide, sulfur powder, HNO3, HCl, and KOH were purchased from Sinopharm. Electrolytes, 1, 2-dimethoxyethane (DME), and 1, 3-dioxolane (DOL) were purchased from the Duoduo reagent network (battery grade). Lithium foil, Li2S, acetylene black, and PVDF were purchased from the electrochemical material network. All reagents were analytical grade and used without further purification.
The coal pitch was first treated with HNO3 and H2SO4 (HNO3:H2SO4 = 3:7) for 12 h at 80 °C, then filtered and washed with deionized water until the filtrate pH approached neutral (pH = 7). To prepare porous carbon fibers, 1.2 g of the acid-treated pitch and 1.2 g of PVP were mixed with 10 mL of N, N-dimethylformamide to make a homogenous solution. Afterward, the solution was electrospun at a distance of 0.15 m and a voltage of 15 kV to produce carbon fiber precursors, which were subsequently oxidized in air at 280 °C for 2 h. The oxidized carbon precursor and KOH (mass ratio of 1:2) were carbonized for 2 h under Nitrogen in a tube furnace at 900 °C, followed by washing with deionized water and 2 M HCl, respectively. The cleaned samples are finally dried in a vacuum drying oven for 12 h to yield CFCP. CFPAN was synthesized similarly to CFCP by replacing the acid-treated pitch with polyacrylonitrile. CFPVP was obtained according to the same procedure using PVP alone without the acid-treated pitch or polyacrylonitrile.
The resultant CFCP, CFPAN, CFPVP, and sulfur powder were combined at the mass ratio of 30:70 in N2. Then the mixture was dried at 155 oC for 12 h to form a sulfur cathode. The sulfur content in S@CFCP, S@CFPAN, and S@CFPVP were determined by thermogravimetry (STA449F3, Netzsch) analysis from ambient temperature to 600 °C at a ramping rate of 10 °C/min under Nitrogen2 atmosphere.
Morphological images were collected on field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Germany, ZEISS sigma500) and field emission transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL: JEM 2100 F and Tecnai G2 F20). X-Ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired in a Rigaku D/Max-2400) diffractometer, operating at 30 kV and 30 mA with Cu-Ka radiation (λ = 0.154 nm). X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained on a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB: 250Xi equipped with a monochromatic Al Ka (1486.6 eV) under vacuum at 15 kV and 10 mA. The N2 physisorption isotherms were acquired using a physical adsorption apparatus (ASAP 2020, Micromeritics). Raman spectra were collected by a Renishaw inVia spectrometer equipped with a 514 nm Ar excitation source at a power of 5 mW.
The working electrodes contain S@CFs, acetylene black, and PVDF in a mass ratio of 60:30:10, with a mass of about 1.0 − 1.2 mg/cm2 and a loading mass of approximately 1.1 − 1.3 mg·cm2 of S. The CR-2032 coin cell battery is assembled using a lithium anode, Celgard-2500 separator, S@carbon fiber cathode, and electrolyte made of 1.0 M LiTFSI, DME/DOL (1:1, V/V) and 1.0% LiNO3 under the protection of Ar. The constant current charge and discharge measurement (GCD) was acquired using a terrestrial battery measuring system (CT2001A, Lanhe) at the current density of 0.1–2 C at 1.7–2.8 V.
The cyclic voltammetry curves (CV) were measured on the electrochemical workstation (760E, Chenhua) between 1.7 and 2.8 V in a voltage window at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV/s, 0.2 mV/s, and 0.5 mV/s, respectively. The symmetrical electrode CV was performed at a scanning rate of 50 mV s− 1 using an electrochemical workstation (Zahner Analysis) with an electrolyte of 0.5 M Li2S6 + 1 M LiTFSI + DOL/DME (1:1). Electrochemical impedance analysis (EIS) was carried out with on an electrochemical workstation (Zahner Analysis) at 100 kHz, 10 mHz and a voltage of 10 mV.
As shown in Fig. 1a-f, CFCP prepared from coal tar pitch is a discontinuous and smooth fiber material with a diameter of approximately 1 μm, which is larger than CFPAN prepared from PAN, with a diameter of 500 nm. The diameter of CFPAN prepared from PVP is uneven, ranging from 1 to 2 μm. At the same time, the length of CFCP is longer than that of CFPAN and CFPVP, which favors the enhancement of the conductivity of carbon fiber (Shimanoe et al. 2020). The diameter and length of CFCP are larger than those of CFPAN, probably originating from the rich oxygen-containing functional groups in the oxidized coal tar pitch, which could interact with PVP during the carbonization process. TEM images of CFCP (Fig. 1g-i) reveal the presence of numerous worm-like micropores in CFCP, as well as a disordered carbon structure on its surface. The EDS mapping graphs (Fig. 1j-l) suggest that C, N, and O are uniformly distributed in CFCP.
As shown in Fig. 2a, the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of CFCP, CFPAN, and CFPVP belong to a combination of types I and IV isotherms (IUPAC), indicating the existence of microporous and mesoporous structures. According to Table 1, the specific surface areas of CFPVP, CFCP, and CFPAN are 2822, 3311, and 3444 m2/g, respectively, suitable for sulfur storage (Yao et al. 2019). Figure 2b shows that the pore size distributions of CFCP, CFPAN, and CFPVP are between 1 and 5 nm, which could offer numerous ion channels and facilitate the conversion of LiPSs in the anode material (Yao et al. 2020a, b). The thermogravimetric curves in Fig. 2c illustrate that the sulfur loads in S@CFPVP, S@CFCP, and S@CFPAN are 67.0%, 69.1%, and 68.9%, respectively, due to the high surface area and large pore volume of the CFs.
Sample | Specific surface area (m2/g) | Pore volume (cm3/g) | Average pore size (nm) |
---|---|---|---|
CFCP | 3311 | 2.0 | 2.4 |
CFPAN | 3443 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
CFPVP | 2822 | 1.7 | 2.4 |
Two faint XRD diffraction peaks at roughly 24° and 43°, corresponding to the (002) and (101) lattice surfaces of the graphitic crystal, respectively, can be observed for the CFPVP, CFCP, and CFPAN (Fig. 3a), reflecting the irregularity of the internal carbon structure of the three carbon fibers (Wang et al. 2020a, b). Raman spectra of CFPVP, CFCP, and CFPAN (Fig. 3b) show a D band at 1342 cm− 1, a G band at 1589 cm− 1, and a 2D band at 2685–2915 cm− 1, attributable to disordered graphite structure in porous carbon, sp2 hybrid carbon in graphite microcrystals, and graphite layer thickness of carbon material, respectively. CFCP has a lower ID/IG ratio and a stronger G band than those of CFPVP and CFPAN, suggesting that the graphitization degree of oxidized pitch-based carbon fiber is higher than that of CFPVP and CFPAN, which contributes to enhancing the electrical conductivity of carbon fiber.
Figure 4a shows the XPS survey spectra of the three CFs, C 1s (285 eV), N 1s (400 eV), and O 1s (533 eV) peaks were observed, suggesting the presence of N and O on the surface of carbon fibers. Figure 4b shows that CFCP has high carbon and N content. The high-resolution O 1s spectra of the CFs were deconvoluted into three peaks (Fig. 4c), corresponding to the configurations C = O (532 eV), C − OH/CO–C (532.8 eV) and O–C = O (533.9 eV), respectively (Wang et al. 2020a, b). The content of oxygen-containing functional groups on CFCP and CFPAN are almost identical, indicating that pitch could be an alternative of PAN to construct N, O-doped carbon fiber. As shown in Fig. 4d, the N 1s spectra of the CFs was deconvoluted into three peaks located at 398.2 eV, 400.1 eV, and 401.5 eV, corresponding to pyridinic-N, pyrrolic-N, and graphitic-N, respectively. Obviously, the content of pyrrolic-N in CFCP is higher than that in others, which can play a role in boosting the catalytic conversion of LiPSs (Zhang et al. 2021). The N and O species in CFCP can enhance the affinity of polar polysulfide/Li2S for CFs, leading to improve the cycle performance and rate capacity of Li-S batteries (Kim and Lee 2021; Yi et al. 2017). From the viewpoints of carbon/sulfur cathodes, the large surface area, high N content, and the surface functional groups of CFCP contribute to strong confinement of LiPSs and uniform deposition of sulfur and Li2S, enabling CFCP an ideal candidate for high-sulfur loading.
The electrochemical performance of the Li-S batteries with S@CFCP cathode was investigated and compared with that of S@CFPAN and S@CFPVP cathodes. As displayed in Fig. 5a, there are two reduction peaks at 2.2–2.4 V and 1.9–2.0 V, which corresponds to the stepwise conversion of long-chain soluble LiPSs to medium-long chain soluble LiPSs and then to insoluble lithium polysulfide (Li2S2/Li2S) (Ouyang et al. 2021; Song et al. 2018). The oxidation peaks near 2.34 and 2.47 V represent the conversion of Li2S2/Li2S to LiPSs and sulfur, respectively. The potential differences between the oxidation and reduction peaks for S@CFPVP, S@CFCP, and S@CFPAN are 0.51 V, 0.4 V, and 0.49 V, respectively, indicating that S@CFCP has lower polarization (Δ = 0.4 V) and stronger ability to promote the redox process of LiPSs compared to S@CFPAN and S@CFPVP. According to Figs. 5b-c, the ratios of specific discharge capacity QH/QL, corresponding to the reduction platform of S@CFCP, S@CFPAN, and S@CFPVP electrodes, are 2.28, 2.31, and 2.21, respectively, indicating that S@CFCP electrode can improve the utilization of LiPSss and accelerate their transformation (Tang et al. 2018; Su et al. 2017). Figure 5d shows the polarization curves of S@CFPVP, S@CFCP, and S@CFPAN. Both the cathode and anode peak currents of the S@CFCP electrode are much larger than those of the S@CFPAN and S@CFPVP electrodes, manifesting that more soluble polysulfides are transformed into insoluble polysulfides over the S@CFCP electrodes which has a higher nucleation and deposition rate towards Li2S.
Figure 6a compares the rate performance of the S@CFPVP, S@CFCP, and S@CFPAN cathodes. Notably, the S@CFCP cathode shows superior rate performance with discharge specific capacities of 1309.5, 916.5, 779.5, 718.9, and 681.2 mAh/g at 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, and 2 C, respectively. When the current density is restored to 0.1 C, the specific capacity approaches 883.0 mAh/g. Figure 6b depicts a typical galvanostatic charge − discharge (GDC) profile of the S@CFCP electrode. At 1 C, S@CFCP had higher capacity and capacity retention than S@CFPAN and S@CFPVP cathodes. After 200 cycles, the discharge capacity of S@CFCP remains at 701.1 mAh/g, with capacity retention and attenuation rates of 82.46% and 0.088%, respectively. As shown in Fig. 6d, at 2 C after 200 cycles, the discharge capacity of S@CFCP was maintained at 611.4 mAh/g with the capacity retention capacity of 76.23%, capacity fade rate of 0.12%, and the average coulomb efficiency of 96.95%. Moreover, as shown in Fig. 6e, at the sulfur surface density of 3.6 mg/cm2 and 1 C, the initial discharge capacity of the S@CFCP electrode is 855.2 mAh/g and the discharge capacity kept at 610.0 mAh/g, with a capacity of 71.33% and a fading rate of 0.29% per cycle after 100 cycles. The performance of the S@CFCP is superior to that of the S@carbon materials cathode reported in the literature (Yi et al. 2017).
To evaluate the adsorption capability and catalytic activity of porous carbon fiber towards LiPSs, as well as the charge transfer resistance of the electrode, Li2S6 adsorption test and EIS measurement were performed, and electrode currents at various sweep speeds were collected. As shown in Fig. 7a, the adsorption capacity of CFCP for Li2S6 is slightly higher than that of CPPAN and CPPVP, as evidenced by the visualized adsorption tests (inset) and the UV-vis absorption spectra. EIS measurement results of S@CFCP, S@CFPAN, and S@CFPVP electrodes (Fig. 7b) show that S@CFCP has a low resistance, which is advantageous to improving the contact between insulating sulfur and conducting carbon, thereby accelerating the charge transfer electrode on the surface and the diffusion of lithium ion in the electrode (Su et al. 2017; Yao et al. 2020a, b). Based on the CV curves of S@CFCP, S@CFPAN, and S@CFPVP at sweep speeds ranging from 1.5 to 2.8 V (Fig. 7c), the peak currents can be calculated using the Randles − Sevcik equation (Ren et al. 2018). As shown in Fig. 7d, the S@CFCP electrode produces greater current than the S@CFPAN and S@CFPVP electrodes. Simultaneously, the slope of the S@CFCP electrode is larger than that of the S@CFPAN and S@CFPVP electrodes, manifesting that CFCP has a strong affinity towards LiPSs and brings about rich electrode/electrolyte active interfaces that are highly active for the catalytic conversion of LiPSs. Summarizing up, the S@CFCP electrode shows a better performance in improving ionic diffusion and the kinetics of polysulfide species conversion than the S@CFPAN and S@CFPVP electrodes.
a UV − vis absorption spectra of the Li2S6 solution before and after adding S@CFPVP, S@CFCP, S@CFPAN, and blank (inset: digital image of pure Li2S6 solution and Li2S6 solutions after 12 h); b EIS profiles of S@CFPVP, S@CFCP, and S@CFPAN at an open-circuit voltage; c CV curves of S@CFCP, S@CFPAN, and S@CFPVP at different scan rates; d CV peak current for cathodic reduction and anodic oxidation process versus the square root of the scan rates
N/O co-doped carbon fiber was produced by electrostatic spinning using H2SO4-HNO3 pretreated coal pitch instead of polyacrylonitrile as the precursor. The as-prepared CFCP exhibits a high specific surface area (3311 m2/g) and a large pore volume (2.0 cm3/g) with abundant N, O uniformly dispersed on the surface, which offers high conductivity, strong adsorption capacity, and fast catalytic conversion of lithium polysulfide as the sulfur host of Li-S batteries. The performance of the S@CFCP electrode is superior to that of the S@CFPAN electrode. At 1 C after 200 cycles, the S@CFCP electrode shows a specific discharge capacity of 701.1 mAh/g, with a capacity retention capacity of 82.46% and a decay rate of 0.088%. At 1 C with a sulfur areal density of 3.6 mg/cm2, the reversible capacity of the S@CFCP electrode remains at 610 mAh/g after 100 cycles with a capacity retention capacity of 71.33% and a decay rate of 0.29%.
[1] | He B, Rao Z, Cheng Z, Liu D, HE D, Chen J, Miao Z, Yuan L, LI Z, Huang Y (2021) Rationally design a sulfur cathode with solid-phase conversion mechanism for high cycle-stable Li–S batteries. Adv Energy Mater 11(14):2003690 |
[2] | Jin Y, Zong X, Zhang X, Jia Z, Xie H, Xiong Y (2022) Constructing 3D Li+-percolated transport network in composite polymer electrolytes for rechargeable quasi-solid-state lithium batteries. Energy Storage Mater 49:433–444 |
[3] | Kim SG, Lee JS (2021) Multiscale pore contained carbon nanofiber-based field-effect transistor biosensors for nesfatin-1 detection. J Mater Chem B 9(30):6076–6083 |
[4] | Li H, He X, Wu T, Jin B, Yang L, Qiu J (2022) Synthesis, modification strategies and applications of coal-based carbon materials. Fuel Process Technol 230 |
[5] | Ouyang Y, Zong W, Wang J, Xu Z, Mo L, Lai F, Xu Z-L, Miao Y-E, Liu T (2021) Multi-scale uniform Li regulation triggered by tunable electric field distribution on oxygen-functionalized porous framework for flexible Li-S full batteries. Energy Storage Mater 42:68–77 |
[6] | Ren J, Zhou Y, Xia L, Zheng Q, Liao J, Long E, Xie F, Xu C, Lin D (2018) Rational design of a multidimensional N-doped porous carbon/MoS2/CNT nano-architecture hybrid for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 6(28):13835–13847 |
[7] | Shimanoe H, Mashio T, Nakabayashi K, Inoue T, Hamaguchi M, Miyawaki J, Mochida I, Yoon S-H (2020) Manufacturing spinnable mesophase pitch using direct coal extracted fraction and its derived mesophase pitch based carbon fiber. Carbon 158:922–929 |
[8] | Song Y, Wang H, Ma Q, Li D, Yu W, Liu G, Wang T, Yang Y, Dong X, Wang J (2018) Dandelion derived nitrogen-doped hollow carbon host for encapsulating sulfur in lithium sulfur battery. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(3):3042–3051 |
[9] | Su D, Cortie M, Fan H, Wang G (2017) Prussian blue nanocubes with an open framework structure coated with PEDOT as high-capacity cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 29(48):1700587 |
[10] | Sun X, Li Q, Cao DX, Wang Y, Anderson A, Zhu H (2022) High surface area N-doped carbon fibers with accessible reaction sites for all-solid-state Lithium-sulfur batteries. Small 18(6):2105678 |
[11] | Tang H, Yao S, Xue S, Liu M, Chen L, Jing M, Shen X, LI T, XIAO K, QIN S (2018) In-situ synthesis of carbon@Ti4O7 non-woven fabric as a multi-functional interlayer for excellent lithium-sulfur battery. Electrochim Acta 263:158–167 |
[12] | Wang Z, Liu J, Zhang B, Sun L, Cong L, LU L, Mauger A, Julien CM, Xie H, Sun H (2020a) Modulating molecular orbital energy level of lithium polysulfide for high-rate and long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater 24:373–378 |
[13] | Wang J, Li G, Luo D, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Zhou G, Shui L, Wang X, Chen Z (2020b) Engineering the conductive network of metal oxide-based sulfur cathode toward efficient and longevous lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 10(41):2002076 |
[14] | Wang Zh C, Qf, Guo FJ, Yx Y, Le,Cao J Q (2023) Preparation and electrochemical properties of low-temperature activated porous carbon from coal tar pitch. Diam Relat Mater 135:109855 |
[15] | Xie S, Yao T, Wang J, Alsulami H, Kutbi MA, Wang H (2020) Coaxially integrating TiO2/MoO3 into carbon nanofibers via electrospinning towards enhanced lithium ion storage performance. ChemistrySelect 5(11):3225–3233 |
[16] | Xing B, Zeng H, Huang G, Jia J, Yuan R, Zhang C, Sun Q, Cao Y, Chen Z, Liu B (2021) Magnesium citrate induced growth of noodle-like porous graphitic carbons from coal tar pitch for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 376:138043 |
[17] | Yao S, Xue S, Peng S, Jing M, Shen X, Li T, Yiliu Z (2019) Electrospun zeolitic imidazolate framework-derived nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers with high performance for lithium-sulfur batteries. Int J Energy Res 43(5):1892–1902 |
[18] | Yao Y, Wang H, Yang H, Zeng S, Xu R, Liu F, Shi P, Feng Y, Wang K, Yang W, WU X, Luo W, Yu Y (2020a) A dual-functional conductive framework embedded with TiN-VN heterostructures for highly efficient polysulfide and lithium regulation toward stable Li-S full batteries. Advaced Mater 32 (6), e1905658 |
[19] | Yao S, Wang Y, He Y, Majeed A, Liang Y, Shen X, Li T, Qin S, Wen W (2020b) Synergistic effect of titanium-oxide integrated with graphitic nitride hybrid for enhanced electrochemical performance in lithium‐sulfur batteries. Int J Energy Res 44(13):10937–10945 |
[20] | Yi GS, Sim ES, Chung YC (2017) Effect of lithium-trapping on nitrogen-doped graphene as an anchoring material for lithium-sulfur batteries: a density functional theory study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19(41):28189–28194 |
[21] | Zhang M, Lu Cx, Bizh XUXL, REN XD LIXZ, LU K, YUAN SX (2021) Preparation of highly pyrrolic-nitrogen-doped carbon aerogels for Lithium-Sulfur batteries. ChemElectroChem 8(5):895–902 |
[22] | Zhang Md, Qu M, Yuan Wh M, Jw H, Zq W Mb (2023) Green synthesis of hierarchically porous carbon derived from coal tar pitch for enhanced lithium storage. Batteries 9(9):473 |
[23] | Zhang Ys Z, Xl S, Sp, Ding B, Zhang P, Shao G (2022) Lithium–Sulfur batteries Meet Electrospinning: recent advances and the key parameters for high gravimetric and volume energy density. Adv Sci 9:2103879 |
[24] | Zhuang QC, Wu JP, Wei Y, Yang YL, Zhao ZH, Yan X (2021) Preparation of three-dimensional coal tar pitch based porous carbon by α-Fe2O3 template for high performance supercapacitor. J Fuel Chem Technol 50(4):408–417 |
[25] | Zhujd, Cheng H, Zhu P, Li Y, Gao Q, Zhang X (2022) Electrospun nanofibers enabled Advanced Lithium – Sulfur batteries. Acc Chem Res 3:149–160 |
01 July 2023
05 November 2023
29 May 2024
November -0001
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-024-00711-y