The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal. It focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development, serving as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues.
Coverage includes original research articles, new developments, case studies and critical reviews in all aspects of scientific and engineering research on coal, coal utilizations and coal mining. Among the broad topics receiving attention are coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology; coal mining theory, technology and engineering; coal processing, utilization and conversion; coal mining environment and reclamation and related aspects.
The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs so authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.
The journal operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous.
A forum for new research findings, case studies and discussion of important challenges in coal science and mining development
Offers an international perspective on coal geology, coal mining, technology and engineering, coal processing, utilization and conversion, coal mining environment and reclamation and more
Published with the China Coal Society
Research Article
Open Access
Published: 19 November 2024
0 Accesses
International Journal of Coal Science & Technology Volume 11, article number 81, (2024)
1.
Analytical and Applied Chemistry Division, CSIR- National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur, India
2.
Coal and Coke Making Research Group, R&D, Tata Steel Limited, Jamshedpur, India
3.
Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4.
Department of Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
5.
U.S. Geological Survey Geology, Energy, & Minerals Science Center, Reston, USA
Exploration of secondary resources for isolation of valuable constituents, such as rare earth elements (REEs) and trace elements (TEs), is of importance owing to the need to identify new domestic sources and reduce reliance on imports. The present study systematically discusses the distribution of REEs and TEs in core samples from the coal block of Bhalukasba Surni {(B1(125 m)-B9 (409 m)} located in Rajmahal coalfield, Jharkhand, India, which has not been investigated previously for its geochemistry. The studied coal samples were found to be enriched in TEs whose abundances were in the order of Mn > Mo > Zr > Ni > Cr > V > Cu > Zn > Pb, and REEs (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu) along with Sc and Y. The average concentration of REEs with yttrium (ΣREY) on an ash basis was 528 ppm, which is significantly higher than the world average for coal ash (435 ppm). Of the samples investigated, B3 (182–184 m) and B8 (396–399 m) demonstrated relatively higher concentrations of potentially economic elements, with B3 containing a higher proportion of middle to heavy REEs Gd, Dy, Ho and Er, and B8 showing relative enrichment in Nd and Y. On dry whole coal basis, B6 (275–278 m) showed a considerably higher concentration of Ge (55 ppm) than other samples, whereas the concentration of Zr varied in the range of 90–160 ppm in the whole coal block. X-ray diffraction studies revealed the presence of quartz, keatite, hematite, zircon, anatase and orthoclase in the coal ash samples prepared at 815 °C. REEs exhibited prominent positive correlation with Al2O3 (0.4 < r > 0.9) which is supportive of their residence in primary clay minerals such as kaolinite and illite-smectite. Additionally, a positive correlation of REEs with P2O5 (0.4 < r > 0.9) suggests their association with phosphate minerals (such as monazite, xenotime, apatite). Positive correlation with TiO2 (r > 0.7) corroborates the possible association of REEs with anatase. The morphology of the coal ash samples viewed in SEM showed the presence of Al2O3 and SiO2 enriched irregular-sponge particles likely derived from partly-fused clay minerals, which accounted for the lower extent of REE encapsulation. The Bhalukasba Surni coal block is potentially of economic importance due to its enrichment in Ge, Zr, and the REEs.
India’s industrial heritage was built on coal mined indigenously, and coal will continue to be one of the most viable fossil fuel reserves, supplemented by continued development of renewable energy sources (Indian Bureau of Mines, 2019). Apart from understanding the importance of coal in combustion studies or its suitability for metallurgical applications, greater attention has recently been directed towards potential utilization of chemical constituents commonly found in coal. Trace elements (TEs) and rare earth elements (REEs) have gained significant importance owing both to associated environmental concerns and to their increased need in modern day devices, respectively. The impact of trace elements in combustion and gasification studies has been widely investigated (e.g., Wang 2023; Lapidus 2022; Xiong 2022; Vejahati et al. 2010; Clark, 1993; Querol, 1996). There is motivation to explore the potential to isolate REEs from coal by-products owing to three important factors, (a) meeting the increasing demand in modern day uses; (b) utilization of a waste which is generated in huge quantities; and (c) reduction in primary mining activities for these constituents (Eterigho-Ikelegbe et al. 2021; Fu et al. 2022). The distribution and association of TEs or REEs in coal vary considerably based on geologic setting and geographic distribution.
Trace elements in coal are primarily localized in the inorganic matter (Kolker et al. 2021; Finkelman et al. 2019; Chelgani 2019), although, partial organic associations are also reported (Wang et al. 2003; Qin et al. 2018; Dai et al. 2020). Where present in an organic association, trace elements can be bound with the organic matter or present as chelates, or organometallic complexes within the organic matter (Ward 2016). Particularly for low rank coals, trace elements dissolved in the pore water become adsorbed within organic components (Li et al., 2010). The TEs which are most commonly organically bound are B, Be, Ga, and Ge, implying their intimate association with the coal matrix (Vejahati, 2010). Other elements, including As, Cr, Ni, Sb, Se, Ti, U, and V, are known to be either inorganically or organically bound (Dai et al. 2020; Ikelegbe et al. 2021; Davidson 2000; Querol et al. 1998; Vejahati, 2010). The knowledge of chemical associations of trace elements is instrumental in determining; (a) if certain elements need to be reduced from the coal prior to utilization (Norton et al., 1991); (b) to estimate the fate (emission, soil, or sediment) of the constituent elements following coal utilization (Clarke 1993); (c) possible ways to mitigate any potential environmental and health issues an element may have in the utilization process (Clarke 1993); and (d) control release of metals from coal and coal combustion materials to ground water (Wang, 2003; Twardowska, 2003; Georgakopoulos, 2019).
The strategic importance of REEs has enhanced the global demand for these elements significantly in the past few years (Fu et al. 2022). To diversify supply of REEs, exploration of indigenous resources is of central importance in every country which possesses natural abundance. India possesses about 6% of the total global reserve of REEs, nevertheless, it produces only 1% of the global supply (Indian Bureau of Mines, 2019). One of the primary reasons behind the lower-than-expected production is insufficient knowledge of the distribution of REEs in the Indian sub-continent. Only a few recent exploratory studies have been reported from India (Mishra et al. 2019; Saha et al. 2016, 2018; Saikia et al. 2021; Kumari et al. 2023; Kumar et al., 2023). REE deposits are commonly found in (a) carbonatites (Wang et al. 2020), (b) magmatic magnetite-hematite bodies (Frietsch and Perdahl 1995), (c) peralkaline igneous systems (Chakhmouradian and Zaitsev 2012), (d) xenotime-monazite accumulations in mafic gneiss (Engi 2017), (e) ion-absorption clay deposits (Borst et al. 2020), and (f) monazite-xenotime-bearing deposits (Engi 2017).
According to the Geological Survey of India (GSI), the total reserves of coal in Rajmahal Coalfield in Jharkhand State were estimated to be 13.13 billion tonnes (metric tons). The Rajmahal coalfield, belonging to Eastern Coalfields Limited, possesses the third highest coal reserve in Jharkhand, producing thermal grade coals at shallow depth (up to 300 m). The Rajmahal Basin has been recently explored with respect to the origin of organic matter, depositional environment and paleoclimatic variations of Barakar formation (Table 1) which contains coaly matter (Mathews et al., 2020). Subsequently, presence of early Permian wildfire activities in the sediments was shown by Murthy et al. (2021) in the same area, followed by a detailed study of the pore and fractal attributes of the Barakar Shales belonging to Rajmahal Basin (Mishra et al. 2021). To complement these investigations, the present study delineates the geochemistry of the same geogrhic area, focusing on the strategically important elemental composition and their respective associations.
Time | Formation | Lithologies | Thickness |
---|---|---|---|
Recent to sub-recent | Alluvium | Coastal dunes and beach sands, silt and mudflats | Up to 80 m |
[Unconformity] | |||
Early Cretaceous to early Jurassic | Rajmahal traps and Intertrappean | Flows of basalt, pitchstone and Intertrappean beds. | 600 m |
[Unconformity] | |||
Late Triassic | Dubrajpur | Pebbly sandstone, coarse to medium grained sandstone, red siltstone | 60–250 m |
[Unconformity] | Barakar | Coarse to medium grained sandstone, pebbly sandstone, gray shale, clay, and coal beds | |
Early Permian | Karharbari | Grit, conglomerate and carbonaceous sandstone Diamictite, greenish sandstone, olive and chocolate shale | 250–550 m |
Talcher | |||
[Unconformity] | |||
Archean | Granite, gneiss, amphibolite, bands of quartzite |
The present study aims to contribute to the understanding of distribution and quantification of both trace elements and rare earth elements from Bhalukasba Surni block of Rajmahal coalfield, Jharkhand, India. Coal samples were collected with varying depths of the selected borehole and converted to ash under laboratory conditions (815 °C), to be used for geochemical and elemental analysis. Furthermore, the coal ash samples were analyzed for their mineralogical composition and morphological properties using various analytical techniques.
Rajmahal Basin is located within latitudes 24º 00´´:25º 30´´ N and longitudes 87º 00´´:88º 00´´ E, and comes under Rajmahal-Purnea graben extending over the Jharkhand and West Bengal States of India (Fig. 1). The basin is oriented in a N–S direction bounded by easterly dipping step-fault systems and covered by soft sediments or alluvium (Ghose et al. 2017; Murthy et al. 2021). The total area of the basin includes four districts within Jharkhand, i.e., Sahibganj, Pakur, Godda and Dumka, comprising five coalfields in total (Ghose et al. 2017). Geographically, the basin is bounded by the river Ganges (Ganga) in the north, Rajmahal volcanics in the east, metamorphic rocks in the west, and by laterite and alluvium to the south (Singh and Singh 1996). In the western peripheries of the basin, the Early Permian Barakar coal seams are present as a thin and irregular stretch (Fig. 1). The lithostratigraphic succession of the Rajmahal Basin (Table 1) shows Archean basement separated by a well-defined unconformity with the overlying Lower Gondwana sediments, succeeded upward by the Karharbari Formation. The thick coal and shale horizons of the Barakar Formation spread conformably over the Archean basement (Singh and Singh 1996). The Permian sediments are overlain by the Dubrajpur and Rajmahal Formations which primarily consist of sandstones, siltstones, and clays (Murthy et al. 2021). A total of nine coal samples were collected for the present study at varying depths from the borehole in the Rajmahal basin.
a The location of Rajmahal basin in India; b The geological map of the sample area of Bhalukasba Surni (Singh and Singh 1996)
Nine coal samples taken at varying depth (124 m to 409 m) from cores penetrating the Rajmahal coalfield, Jharkhand, India were acquired in 2018 for the present investigation. The coal samples were pulverized to a particle size of -212 μm (-72 mesh) prior to analysis. Proximate analysis of the coal samples was performed using proximate analyzer as per IS 1350 (Part 1): RA 2019. The Gross Calorific Value (GCV) of coal samples was determined using Parr 6200 bomb calorimeter (Parr, USA) as per ASTM D 5865:2019. The coal ash sample was prepared as per IS: 1350 (Part 1): RA 2019 where the coal samples were heated in air at 815 °C for 1 h in a muffle furnace. Lithium metaborate and lithium tetraborate were added in sample fusion digestion. Nitric acid (reagent grade, 65%), was used to digest fused sample materials. Ashed sample was used in X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF; major elements such as Si, Al, Fe, K, Ca, Ti, Mg, P, S, Na), X-ray diffraction (XRD), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; REEs such as La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Sc and Y) and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; trace elements such as Be, Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Ge, Cd, Pb, V, Zn, Zr, Mo). Scanning electron microscopy was employed in morphological studies of coal ash samples which was operated at 20 kV and a working distance of 14.6 mm, at a magnification of either 7000x or 10,000x.
The total REE concentration was determined in accordance with the protocol published previously by Banerjee et al. (2021). Aliquots of laboratory coal ash (0.1 g) were mixed with a fusion mixture of lithium metaborate (0.2 g, LiBO2) and lithium tetraborate (0.15 g, Li2B4O7). The fusion mixture was thoroughly homogenized and then fused at 815 °C in a muffle furnace for 1 h. The temperature of the crucible was first lowered to 300 °C and subsequently reduced to room temperature. The fused sample was dissolved using 10% nitric acid solution along with constant agitation to ensure complete dissolution. All the dilutions were performed using high purity laboratory water which was produced using a Milli Q water purification system (Millipore). The resultant acidified extract thus obtained was then transferred into a 250 ml volumetric flask to be analyzed by ICP-MS and ICP-OES. This fusion approach ensures digestion of REE-bearing trace minerals such as zircon and monazite, which may not be completely broken down using standard multi-acid digestion approaches.
The whole coal or coal ash prepared by low temperature ashing (LTA) was not available for XRD prior to ashing for chemical analysis. An X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrophotometer (S8 Tiger, Bruker) was employed to determine the major elemental composition of coal ash samples, using the pressed pellet method. XRD of the ash was recorded over a 2θ range of 5°-90°, with a step size of 0.03° using Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation. The qualitative analyses of the mineralogical phases present were determined using High Score plus software based on the JCPDS database. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (FEI NOVA NANOSEM 430) was used to examine the morphology and the mineralogical analysis of coal ash samples.
Characterization of coal samples prior to ashing, including proximate and ultimate analysis, is tabulated in Table 2. The average result for all the crucial parameters is summarized in Table 3. There was no trend in coal properties, in particular, with respect to depth. The sulphur content was typically low in all the coal samples (< 0.6%). The fixed carbon and mineral matter content are consistent with the calorific values (≤4000 cal/g), which demonstrated these to be low grade coals (Table 3). The volatile matter content in the examined coal samples was in the range of 18% – 28%. The equilibrated moisture determined at 60% Relative Humidity and 40 °C (as per IS: 1350 Part I-1984) showed that the moisture content in coals varied from 3.5% to 8% and the ash yield in the range of 28% – 50%.
Depths (m) | Samples | Ultimate analysis | Proximate analysis | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C (%) | H (%) | N (%) | S (%) | O (%) | 60% M | Ash | VM | FC | GCV (cal/g) | ||
124.71-126.15 | B1 | 50.62 | 3.03 | 1.25 | 0.33 | 44.77 | 8.08 | 35.19 | 23.59 | 33.14 | 3930 |
131.05-132.29 | B2 | 43.53 | 2.93 | 1.07 | 0.62 | 51.85 | 7.58 | 41.13 | 25.75 | 25.54 | 3446 |
181.61–183.70 | B3 | 51.51 | 3.09 | 1.26 | 0.46 | 43.68 | 7.88 | 33.89 | 25.76 | 32.47 | 4100 |
210.90–219.00 | B4 | 56.59 | 3.41 | 1.33 | 0.46 | 38.21 | 7.88 | 28.61 | 28.26 | 35.25 | 4598 |
230.58-236.26 | B5 | 51.68 | 3.26 | 1.28 | 0.54 | 43.24 | 6.98 | 34.04 | 26.30 | 32.68 | 4237 |
275.04-277.77 | B6 | 43.24 | 2.91 | 1.12 | 0.34 | 52.39 | 5.22 | 43.50 | 22.36 | 28.92 | 3607 |
358.00-359.82 | B7 | 45.34 | 2.97 | 0.99 | 0.47 | 50.23 | 4.43 | 43.52 | 22.96 | 29.09 | 3820 |
396.40-399.07 | B8 | 38.77 | 2.53 | 0.82 | 0.2 | 57.68 | 3.66 | 50.14 | 18.39 | 27.81 | 3210 |
400.30-409.10 | B9 | 46.04 | 2.90 | 0.90 | 0.42 | 49.74 | 3.78 | 43.67 | 21.47 | 31.08 | 3803 |
min | 38.77 | 2.53 | 0.82 | 0.20 | 38.21 | 3.66 | 28.61 | 18.39 | 25.54 | 3210 | |
max | 56.59 | 3.41 | 1.33 | 0.62 | 57.68 | 8.08 | 50.14 | 28.26 | 35.25 | 4598 | |
average | 46.77 | 2.96 | 1.06 | 0.40 | 47.97 | 6.17 | 39.30 | 23.87 | 30.66 | 3861 |
Parameters | Range | Average value | |
---|---|---|---|
Ultimate Analysis | HGI | 60–75 | 70.17 |
C% | 38.77–56.59 | 46.77 | |
H% | 2.53–3.41 | 2.96 | |
N% | 0.82–1.33 | 1.06 | |
S% | 0.20–0.62 | 0.40 | |
Proximate Analysis | 60% M | 3.66–8.08 | 6.17 |
Ash | 28.61–50.14 | 39.30 | |
VM | 18.39–28.26 | 23.87 | |
FC | 25.54–35.25 | 30.66 | |
GCV (cal/gm) | 3210–4598 | 3861 |
Major elements for the coal samples were performed using XRF analysis of the ash. Among the major oxides the concentration ranges were as follows- SiO2 (62% – 72%), Al2O3 (17% – 23%) and Fe2O3 (2.0% – 9.5%) (Table 4). The ratio of SiO2/Al2O3 for all nine samples varied from 2.5 to 4.3, indicative of the formation of coal under stable conditions of deposition, likely involving slow but steady subsidence and a low degree of tectonic activity (Ameh 2019). A notable increase in the concentration of Fe2O3 is present in samples B2 and B3 (> 9%), which is a relatively higher value compared to that of the typical concentrations found in coal ash samples elsewhere (≤ 8%; for example (Mishra et al. 2019; Kumari et al. 2023; Kumar et al., 2023). The quantity of SO3 retained in the selected coal ashes varied from 0.23 wt% to 2.18 wt%. Sulphur in coal is from three sources, pyrite, inorganic sulphates, or from the organically-bound sulphur-rich compounds (Chou 2012). Enrichment in Fe2O3 in samples B2 and B3 ash does not show commensurate enrichment in SO3 in ash or S in whole coal, suggesting that Fe2O3 is unlikely to be derived from pyrite alone. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the coal ash samples revealed the presence of quartz (SiO2), keatite (SiO2), anatase (TiO2), zircon (ZrSiO4), hematite (Fe2O3) and orthoclase (KAlSi3O8), with minerals having high melting temperatures (e.g. quartz, zircon) likely to be primary (Oreskes et al., 1990; Abaka-Wood, 2022; Kolker et al. 2017). Qualitative analysis of coal ash samples using SEM-EDX revealed the omnipresence of constituents derived from clay minerals (Al, Si, and in some cases, also K, Fe, Ca) in all the depths (data corresponding to B3 is only shown in Fig. 2). The morphology of the coal ash samples demonstrated the existence of (a) unfused detrital minerals, (b) irregular-spongy particles derived from partly-fused clay minerals (Al2O3 and SiO2) and very locally, colourless vesicular glass, in irregular particles, which could be derived from viscous melting (Ramsden and Shibaoka 1982).
Depths (m) | Major Oxides (%) | Total | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | SO3 | |||
124.71-126.15 | B1 | 72.10 | 1.31 | 19.22 | 2.29 | 0.76 | 2.11 | 0.08 | 1.10 | 0.12 | 1.34 | 100.43 |
131.05-132.29 | B2 | 62.60 | 1.11 | 21.84 | 9.68 | 0.90 | 1.43 | 0.09 | 1.47 | 0.04 | 0.46 | 99.62 |
181.61–183.70 | B3 | 63.40 | 1.79 | 20.59 | 9.41 | 0.89 | 1.98 | 0.06 | 0.81 | 0.05 | 0.64 | 99.62 |
210.90–219.00 | B4 | 65.60 | 1.36 | 19.33 | 4.34 | 0.77 | 5.52 | 0.10 | 0.53 | 0.03 | 2.18 | 99.76 |
230.58-236.26 | B5 | 67.70 | 1.51 | 22.53 | 4.71 | 0.68 | 1.32 | 0.13 | 0.63 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 99.72 |
275.04-277.77 | B6 | 70.80 | 1.39 | 22.21 | 2.67 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 99.73 |
358.00-359.82 | B7 | 75.10 | 1.15 | 17.18 | 4.04 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.04 | 0.69 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 99.42 |
396.40-399.07 | B8 | 62.80 | 2.10 | 24.30 | 3.86 | 0.59 | 2.94 | 0.05 | 0.83 | 1.90 | 0.37 | 99.74 |
400.30-409.10 | B9 | 65.30 | 1.66 | 21.78 | 8.16 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.05 | 0.81 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 99.73 |
The concentration of rare earth elements in the coal ash samples varied considerably with depth. However, this variation did not show a distinct trend with depth, similar to relatively random variation seen in several past studies of Indian coal blocks (Mishra et al. 2019; Kumari et al. 2023). The average concentrations of all the major light rare earths (LREEs) across the various depths were- La (105 ppm), Ce (180 ppm), Nd (76 ppm), Pr (17ppm), Gd and Sm (nearly 13 ppm each) (ash basis; Table 5). In the present study, REE(s) refers to the lanthanide REEs, and REY or ΣREY is used to designate the lanthanides plus Y and Sc (Table 5).
On the other hand, the average concentrations of all heavy rare earths (HREEs) (on an ash basis) were in the range of 1–5 ppm except Dy (12 ppm). Of note, the concentrations of Sc and Y were considerably high in the whole coal block averaging to 23 ppm and 71 ppm, respectively. In particular, the two depths (B3 and B8) showed significant enrichment in critical HREEs (Dy and Y). On an ash basis, the ΣREY concentrations varied from 417 ppm to 697 ppm from B1-B9, with an average concentration of 528 ppm (Table 5). This is a significantly higher concentration than the estimated world average for coal ash (404.5 ppm) as reported by Ketris and Yudovich (2009) which was later revised to 435 ppm upon inclusion of samples from more countries (Fu et al. 2022). Upon comparing the data obtained with that of world coal ash, the concentrations of La, Ce, Nd, and Y were found to be prominently higher (La by 60%, Ce by 44%, Nd by 19% and Y by 39%) in the examined coal block of Bhalukasba Surni (Fig. 3).
Comparison of REE content between World Coal Ash (Ketris and Yudovich 2009) and representative coal ash sample from Bhalukasba Surni (this study). Error bars indicating uncertainty by height of the bar are shown at the top of each histogram
Such a higher concentration is indicative of retention of REY during coal combustion, and the coal ash thus produced could be a potential source for isolation of REY (Fu et al. 2022). Theoretically, the retention of REY at elevated temperatures is only possible if the association in coal is primarily with the inorganic matter a conclusion supported by sequential leaching studies (Finkelman et al. 2018). Kolker et al. (2017) showed that REEs are partitioned into the glass phase (the melt at high temperature) in fly ash, and this is the primary host of REEs in plant-generated fly ash in addition to any trace phases such as monazite and xenotime that persist due to their high melting temperature. Although the proportion of REY associated organically or inorganically varies based on location, low rank coals with low ash content are more likely to have organic associations, whereas for higher rank coals, REEs are primarily inorganically associated (Finkelman et al. 2018; Fu et al. 2022). Total REEs in the ash derived from coals of Bhalukasba Surni are notably high. Due to mass balance, the greatest enrichment in ash relative to the coal is in coals having a low ash yield, assuming a high proportion of REEs from the coal are retained in a smaller mass fraction of the ash (Kolker et al. 2024).
The (La/Yb)N ratio, where N reflects normalization to Upper Continental Crust (UCC; McLennan 2001) was calculated to quantify the relative proportions of LREE and HREE (Table 6). The results obtained demonstrated that the ratio varied between 1.9 and 0.9 and the value of (La/Yb)N for most of the depths were greater than ≥ 1, indicating LREE enrichment. The coal samples demonstrated an absence of Ce anomalies as CeN/CeN* values ranged from 0.95 to 1.07 (Table 6), indicating that the depositional conditions during the formation of the coaly mass had prominent influence of anoxic marine water (Chen et al. 2015; Dai et al. 2016). UCC-normalized plots of all nine samples are given in Fig. 4, which essentially demonstrates that the samples originated from similar crustal sources.
Samples | EuN/EuN* | CeN/CeN* | LaN/YbN |
---|---|---|---|
B1 | 0.82 | 1.01 | 1.60 |
B2 | 0.83 | 1.04 | 1.43 |
B3 | 0.85 | 1.04 | 0.90 |
B4 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.64 |
B5 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 1.49 |
B6 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.44 |
B7 | 1.03 | 0.96 | 1.74 |
B8 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 1.92 |
B9 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 1.87 |
Upper Continental Crust (UCC)-normalized plots of samples examined from the coal block of Bhalukasba Surni, Jharkhand, India (UCC after McLennan 2001)
Unusually high average concentrations of ΣREY were observed in coal ash samples for two depths in particular, B8 (660 ppm) and B3 (586 ppm) (Table 5). Overall, Ce, La, Nd and Y exhibited the highest concentrations of all the REEs, with, Ce being the most abundant lanthanide. A closer look at the concentrations of LREEs and HREEs with respect to the two important depths (B3 and B8) revealed interesting differences. While B3 was found to be HREE enriched {Gd (16 ppm), Dy (16 ppm), Ho (3 ppm), Er (9 ppm), Tm (1.5 ppm), Yb (8.6 ppm), Lu (2 ppm), Sc (28 ppm) and Y(100 ppm)}, B8, on contrary, was found to be especially enriched in LREEs (La, Ce, Pr, Nd and Eu). Thus, with respect to utilization, B3 possesses an abundance of HREEs which are critical in numerous modern applications (Liu and Chen 2021). The increasing demand for HREEs has led to global interest in identifying new sources of these elements. As such, the horizon represented by sample B3 of Bhalukasba Surni is promising for further investigation (Fig. 5). On the other hand, sample B8 was found to be significantly enriched with respect to La (143 ppm), Ce (233 ppm) and Nd (95 ppm), which when combined with that of Y (80 ppm), made this depth, in particular, enriched in REY (660 ppm) by 40% relative to the world coal ash average (404 ppm) (Fu et al. 2022). The outlook co-efficient (Coutl), a measure of economic potential (Seredin and Dai 2012) ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 (Table 5). The average REY of the coal block is 528 ppm. As such, while Coutl is above the 0.7 minimum for promising recovery, REY is somewhat below the 1000 ppm promising threshold proposed by Seredin and Dai (2012). A plot of REY vs. Coutl, demonstrating the promising and non-promising regions is illustrated in Fig. 5. Nonetheless, exploration of Bhalukasba Surni, enriched in REYs, particularly in the depth range of 181–183 m and 396–400 m, and recovery of the corresponding combustion ash may offer some benefit over extraction from conventional ores which typically involves mining.
A graphical presentation of promising and unpromising regions for extraction of REY on the basis of Coutl, excluding REY (after Seredin and Dai 2012) (Orange colour coded sample numbers represent moderately promising depths for extraction; Blue colour coded sample numbers belong to the promising depths and lastly, the green colour coded sample number represents the most promising depth for extraction of valuable constituents
Statistical correlation of REEs with the major oxides in coal ash can be helpful to understand mineralogical occurrence of the REEs and to devise strategies for their isolation from the mineralogical framework. On the basis of multiple exploratory projects performed by Geological Survey of India (GSI; https://www.gsi.gov.in), coal-related studies elsewhere (Kolker et al. 2024) and characteristics of the UCC in general (McLennan 2001), it is expected that Indian coals, soils and sediments are primarily enriched in Light Rare Earth Elements (LREE). In the present study of 9 coal ash samples of Bhalukasba Surni, out of the total mean REE content (excluding Y; 435 ppm), 393.3 ppm was LREEs (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm and Eu) while only about 112.2 ppm was found to be HREEs (Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu), a ratio of ∑LREE/∑HREE of 3.5 (Table 5). This proportion indicates that the primary association of the REEs in this coal block is with the inorganic matter, as HREEs have a greater affinity for organic portions of the coal (Dai et al. 2020). The inorganic affinity of LREEs was substantiated when correlation co-efficients with major oxides were considered, such as Al2O3 (0.6 < r > 0.8), TiO2 (0.6 < r > 0.9), Fe2O3 (0.1 < r > 0.6) and P2O5 (0.4 < r > 0.9). These elemental oxides showed much lower coefficient values for the HREEs. More specifically, the affinity of the full range of LREEs with Al2O3 (0.4 < r > 0.9) and P2O5 (0.4 < r > 0.9) supports the enrichment of LREEs in the chosen coal block and their possible association with phosphate minerals (for example monazite, xenotime) (Wang and Liang 2015; Table 7). The affinity of REEs with TiO2 is noteworthy, which in the present study is expected to be with the mineral phase anatase, which is supported by the XRD data obtained (Fig. 6; Table 7).
A thorough understanding of the geological occurrence of trace elements is required to determine the mobility of environmentally sensitive constituents during coal combustion and ash handling and ascertain the implications of potentially toxic elements towards human health and the environment. The coal block from Bhalukasba Surni demonstrated notable enrichment in certain trace elements (TE). Trace element concentrations expressed on a dry whole coal basis are presented in Table 8. However, considering the differences in their respective volatility, the subsequent discussion has been confined to only those elements which are least likely to be lost on ashing at 815 °C. Past work on trace elements in coal suggests that Ge and Be are most likely to be organically bound (Vassilev et al. 1995; Hower et al. 2002), whereas elements with an inorganic affinity (most likely the host being pyrite) include Mo, Mn, Ba, Pb, Ni, Zn, Cu, Cr and Co (Kolker et al. 2021; Dai et al. 2020). Zr and V can have mixed associations in zircon and illite, respectively (Dai et al. 2020; Vejahati 2010). A statistical correlation of trace elements with the major oxides in coal was examined in order to gain knowledge of their possible association in the mineralogical matrix of coal (Table 9).
The two trace elements which are considered to be of high economic significance and present in considerable concentration in the chosen coal block are zirconium (Zr) and germanium (Ge). The enrichment of Zr (on dry whole coal basis) in B8 (168 ppm) and B9 (159 ppm) in particular, is noteworthy, and Zr was fairly high (90 ppm–150 ppm) throughout the coal block. The occurrence of Zr in the coal ash samples of Bhalukasba Surni coal block may indicate the influence of volcanic ash during coal deposition, as such coals are typically enriched in Zr along with other critical elements and REY (Zhao et al. 2019). There are three possible modes of occurrence of Zr, (a) as absorbed ions on clay minerals (Zhao et al. 2019; Dai et al. 2020); (b) embedded within the Ti-bearing phases such as anatase/rutile (Zhao et al. 2016); or (c) associated with zircon mineral. XRD analysis of the coal ash samples demonstrated the presence of zircon in all the depths. The XRD of sample B9 with the highest concentration of Zr is shown in Fig. 6.
Given that Zr and REY are strongly retained in the ash fraction, their ash-basis data were considered together with major oxides expressed on an ash basis. Statistical results demonstrate significant correlation of Zr with TiO2 and P2O5 (Figs. 7a, b). This further indicates the possibility of Zr existing either as the REE bearing mineral (zircon (ZrSiO4) Zhang et al. 2015), or closely associated with the oxides which have a strong correlation with REEs (TiO2 and P2O5). Of note, Ge failed to show any noticeable association with neither TiO2 nor P2O5 (data not shown), which largely suggests it to be organically associated.
Correlation of zirconium (Zr) with the oxides (TiO2 and P2O5), which demonstrates an association of Zr, likely as zircon, with phosphorus bearing minerals such as monazite, xenotime, and apatite, all of which are REE-bearing, and have an affinity for Zr and TiO2. From Table 9, correlation between Zr and TiO2 is 0.68, and between Zr and P2O5 is 0.70
Germanium is typically associated with the organic structure in coals (Wei et al. 2020). The highest concentration of Ge (55 ppm on dry whole coal basis) was found in B6 (275–277 m depth), which is three times the concentration found in ash from world hard coals (18 ppm; Ketris and Yudovich 2009; Dai et al. 2020). With respect to commercial importance as one of the critical elements, Ge presents the most successful example of commercial extraction from coal for more than five decades, which is commonly performed by employing hydrometallurgical processes consisting of leaching and solution purification (Dai et al. 2020; Nguyen and Lee 2021).
The TEs which are listed as hazardous in the Mercury and Air Toxics (MATS) standards by the U.S. Environment Protection Agency are Cr, Mn, Ni, As, Se, Cd, Sb, Hg, Mo and Pb (U.S. EPA, 2011). Those which pose some of the greatest health concerns, such as Se and Hg, are highly volatile and are best determined on whole coal without ashing. Apart from that, a large group of TEs likely show minimal volatility at the 815 ̊C ashing temperature, for example As, Cr, Ni, Sb, V and Mo. Nonetheless, values obtained for these elements can be considered minima, with substantial enrichment shown in the Bhalukasba Surni coal block for Mo (90–153 ppm on dry whole coal basis, B2 and B8 being the highest, and other important trace elements of interest. These include Ni (30–154 ppm), V (27–60 ppm), Cr (60–115 ppm), Cu (10–36 ppm), Cd (0.3-1.0 ppm), Ba (65–167 ppm), Co (9–36 ppm), Mn (80–540 ppm) and Zn (10–40 ppm) (Table 8). The highest concentrations of individual elements, with respect to depth, were Mn (540 ppm, B3), Ni (154 ppm, B3), V (60 ppm, B6) and Zn (40 ppm, B2) and Ba (167 ppm, B8).
The distribution of REEs and TEs was systematically investigated using a series of complementary analytical techniques for coal ash from a coal block of Indian origin, prepared under laboratory conditions (at 815 °C). The average total REY of the whole coal block is 528 ppm and Coutl was 0.9. As such, REY content and its distribution approaches that considered promising for extraction. The average concentration of LREE was found to be 394 ppm and that of HREE was 112 ppm (including Sc and Y). Statistical correlation of REEs with major oxides demonstrated significant correlation with P2O5 and TiO2, likely indicating primary associations with common REE-bearing phosphate minerals such as xenotime, monazite, and apatite, and for TiO2, possibly anatase. Correlation of REEs with Al2O3 indicates that a portion of the REE budget is derived from clay minerals which likely made up a significant portion of the mineral matter in coal prior to ashing, but could not be quantified, as raw coal and/or low temperature ash was not available for XRD prior to ashing at 815 °C. Examination of the morphology of coal ash using SEM − EDX showed an irregular-spongy texture suggestive of clay minerals (Al2O3 and SiO2) undergoing partial melting during ash formation. The concentration of elemental zirconium was considerably high in all the depths (90–160 ppm on dry whole coal basis) which was concluded to be primarily present as the mineral zircon, which was confirmed by XRD. Zirconium shows a strong correlation with TiO2 and P2O5, which also demonstrated strong correlation with the REEs, further indicating the association of zircon with other REE-bearing phases. In addition to Zr and the REEs, some samples (B6- 55.1 ppm, and B7- 29.5 ppm) showed significant enrichment in Ge, and together, these elements may present attractive exploration targets in the section investigated.
[1] | Abaka-Wood GB, Ehrig K, Addai-Mensah J, Skinner W (2022) Recovery of Rare Earth Elements minerals from Iron-Oxide-Silicate-Rich Tailings. Res Rev Eng 3(2):259–275 |
[2] | Ameh EG (2019) Geochemistry and multivariate statistical evaluation of major oxides, trace and rare earth elements in coal occurrences and deposits around Kogi East, Northern Anambra Basin, Nigeria. Int J Coal Sci Technol 6:260–273 |
[3] | Borst AM, Smith MP, Finch AA, Estrade G, Villanova-de-Benavent C, Nason P, Marquis E, Horsburgh NJ, Goodenough KM, Xu C, Kynický J (2020) Adsorption of rare earth elements in regolith-hosted clay deposits. Nat Commun 11(1):4386 |
[4] | Chakhmouradian AR, Zaitsev AN (2012) Rare earth mineralization in igneous rocks: sources and processes. Elements 8(5):347–353 |
[5] | Chelgani SC (2019) Investigating the occurrences of valuable trace elements in African coals as potential byproducts of coal and coal combustion products. J Afr Earth Sc 150:131–135 |
[6] | Chen J, Algeo TJ, Zhao L, Chen ZQ, Cao L, Zhang L, Li Y (2015) Diagenetic uptake of rare earth elements by bioapatite, with an example from Lower Triassic conodonts of South China. Earth Sci Rev 149:181–202 |
[7] | Chou CL (2012) Sulfur in coals: a review of geochemistry and origins. Int J Coal Geol 100:1–3 |
[8] | Clarke LB (1993) The fate of trace elements during coal combustion and gasification: an overview. Fuel 72(6):731–736 |
[9] | Dai S, Graham IT, Ward CR (2016) A review of anomalous rare earth elements and yttrium in coal. Int J Coal Geol 159:82–95 |
[10] | Dai S, Hower JC, Finkelman RB, Graham IT, French D, Ward CR, Eskenazy G, Wei Q, Zhao L (2020) Organic associations of non-mineral elements in coal: a review. Int J Coal Geol 218:103347 |
[11] | Davidson RM (2000) Modes of occurrence of trace elements in coal: results from an international collaborative programme. Carbon 63(7531):69–62 |
[12] | Engi M (2017) Petrochronology based on REE-minerals: monazite, allanite, xenotime, apatite. Rev Mineral Geochem 83(1):365–418 |
[13] | Eterigho-Ikelegbe O, Harrar H, Bada S (2021) Rare earth elements from coal and coal discard–A review. Miner Eng 173:107187 |
[14] | Finkelman RB, Palmer CA, Wang P (2018) Quantification of the modes of occurrence of 42 elements in coal. Int J Coal Geol 185:138–160 |
[15] | Finkelman RB, Dai S, French D (2019) The importance of minerals in coal as the hosts of chemical elements: a review. Int J Coal Geol 212:103251 |
[16] | Frietsch R, Perdahl JA (1995) Rare earth elements in apatite and magnetite in Kiruna-type iron ores and some other iron ore types. Ore Geol Rev 9(6):489–510 |
[17] | Fu B, Hower JC, Zhang W, Luo G, Hu H, Yao H (2022) A review of rare earth elements and yttrium in coal ash: content, modes of occurrences, combustion behaviour, and extraction methods. Prog Energy Combust Sci 88:100954 |
[18] | Georgakopoulos A, Filippidis A, Kassoli-Fournaraki A, Fernández-Turiel JL, Llorens JF, Mousty F (2002) Leachability of major and trace elements of fly ash from Ptolemais power station, Northern Greece. Energy Sources 24(2):103–113 |
[19] | Ghose NC, Chatterjee N, Windley BF (2017) Subaqueous early eruptive phase of the late Aptian Rajmahal volcanism, India: evidence from volcaniclastic rocks, bentonite, black shales, and oolite. Geosci Front 8(4):809–822 |
[20] | Hower JC, Ruppert LF, Williams DA (2002) Controls on boron and germanium distribution in the low-sulfur Amos coal bed, Western Kentucky coalfield, USA. Int J Coal Geol 53(1):27–42 |
[21] | Indian Myearbook (2019) Part III: Mineral Reviews, 58th Edition, Govt. Of India, Ministry of Mines, Nagpur |
[22] | Ketris MP, Yudovich YE (2009) Estimations of clarkes for carbonaceous biolithes: world averages for trace element contents in black shales and coals. Int J Coal Geol 78:135–148 |
[23] | Kolker A, Scott C, Hower JC, Vazquez JA, Lopano CL, Dai S (2017) Distribution of rare earth elements in coal combustion fly ash, determined by SHRIMP-RG ion microprobe. Int J Coal Geol 184:1–0 |
[24] | Kolker A, Scott C, Lefticariu L, Mastalerz M, Drobniak A, Scott A (2021) Trace element partitioning during coal preparation: insights from US Illinois Basin coals. Int J Coal Geol 243:103781 |
[25] | Kolker A, Lefticariu L, Anderson ST (2024) Energy Related Rare Earth Element Sources. In: Murty Y, Lifton J, Alvin M (eds) The Rare Earth Metals and Minerals Industry – Status and Prospects, Springer Nature |
[26] | Kumar A, Kumari S, Mustapha KA, Chakladar S, Chakravarty S Geochemical characteristics of the Rajmahal coals in Dhulia North Block, Eastern India: implication to their utilization and environment. Environ Geochem Health 2023 Jan 10:1–7 |
[27] | Kumari S, Roy T, Chakladar S, Kumar A, Arif M, Mohanty A, Kundu R, Chakravarty S (2023) Distribution, mode of occurrence, and significance of rare-earth elements in coal from Samaleswari open cast coal blocks, Odisha, India with their provenance and paleodepositional environment. Environ Earth Sci 82(5):130 |
[28] | Lapidus AL, Khudyakov DS, Beilina NY, Trukhina MA, Kozlov AM, Zhagfarov FG (2022) Solid fossil fuels as a source of trace elements. Solid Fuel Chem 56(1):1–4 |
[29] | Li Z, Ward CR, Gurba LW (2010) Occurrence of non-mineral inorganic elements in macerals of low-rank coals. Int J Coal Geol 81(4):242–250 |
[30] | Liu T, Chen J (2021) Extraction and separation of heavy rare earth elements: a review. Sep Purif Technol 276:119263 |
[31] | Mathews RP, Pillai SS, Manoj MC, Agrawal S (2020) Palaeoenvironmental reconstruction and evidence of marine influence in Permian coal-bearing sequence from Lalmatia Coal mine (Rajmahal Basin), Jharkhand, India: a multi-proxy approach. Int J Coal Geol 224:103485 |
[32] | McLennan SM (2001) Relationships between the trace element composition of sedimentary rocks and upper continental crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. ; 2(4) |
[33] | Mishra V, Chakravarty S, Finkelman RB, Varma AK (2019) Geochemistry of rare earth elements in lower Gondwana coals of the Talchir Coal Basin, India. J Geochem Explor 204:43–56 |
[34] | Mishra S, Dixit A, Mishra VK, Singh VP, Mendhe VA (2021) Pore structures and fractal dimensions in early Permian Barakar shales of Rajmahal Basin, Jharkhand, India. Arab J Geosci 14:1–9 |
[35] | Murthy S, Mendhe VA, Uhl D, Mathews RP, Mishra VK, Gautam S (2021) Palaeobotanical and biomarker evidence for early Permian (Artinskian) wildfire in the Rajmahal Basin, India. J Palaeogeography 10(1):1–21 |
[36] | Nguyen TH, Lee MS (2021) A review on germanium resources and its extraction by hydrometallurgical method. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 42(6):406–426 |
[37] | Norton GA, Markuszewski R, Buttermore WH The removal and control of trace elements in coal and coal wastes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Elemental Analysis of Coal and its Bv-Products 1991 Sep 9 (pp. 270–288) |
[38] | Oreskes N, Einaudi MT (1990) Origin of rare earth element-enriched hematite breccias at the Olympic Dam Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit, Roxby Downs, South Australia. Econ Geol 85(1):1–28 |
[39] | Qin S, Lu Q, Li Y, Wang J, Zhao Q, Gao K (2018) Relationships between trace elements and organic matter in coals. J Geochem Explor 188:101–110 |
[40] | Querol X, Juan R, Lopez-Soler A, Fernandez-Turiel J, Ruiz CR (1996) Mobility of trace elements from coal and combustion wastes. Fuel 75(7):821–838 |
[41] | Querol X, Finkelman RB, Alastuey A, Huerta A, Mroczkowski S, Kolker A, Chenery SN, Robinson JJ, Juan R, Lopez-Soler A (1998) Quantitative determination of modes of occurrence of major, minor and trace elements in coal: a comparison of results from different methods |
[42] | Ramsden AR, Shibaoka M (1982) Characterization and analysis of individual fly-ash particles from coal-fired power stations by a combination of optical microscopy, electron microscopy and quantitative electron microprobe analysis. Atmospheric Environ (1967) 16(9):2191–2206 |
[43] | Saha D, Chakravarty S, Shome D, Basariya MR, Kumari A, Kundu AK, Chatterjee D, Adhikari J, Chatterjee D (2016) Distribution and affinity of trace elements in Samaleswari coal, Eastern India. Fuel 181:376–388 |
[44] | Saikia BK, Hower JC, Islam N, Sharma A, Das P (2021) Geochemistry and petrology of coal and coal fly ash from a thermal power plant in India. Fuel 291:120122 |
[45] | Seredin VV, Dai S (2012) Coal deposits as potential alternative sources for lanthanides and yttrium. Int J Coal Geol 94:67–93 |
[46] | Singh MP, Singh PK (1996) Petrographic characterization and evolution of the Permian coal deposits of the Rajmahal basin, Bihar, India. Int J Coal Geol 29(1–3):93–118 |
[47] | Twardowska I, Tripathi PS, Singh G, Kyziol J (2003) Trace elements and their mobility in coal ash/fly ash from Indian power plants in view of its disposal and bulk use in agriculture. Chem Trace Elem fly ash. :25–44 |
[48] | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] (2011) Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Web Page. EPA website, accessed July 3, 2020, at. https://www.epa.gov/mats |
[49] | Vassilev S, Eskenazy G, Tarassov M, Dimov V (1995) Mineralogy and geochemistry of a vitrain lens with unique trace element content from the Vulche Pole coal deposit, Bulgaria. Geologica Balcanica 25:111–124 |
[50] | Vejahati F, Xu Z, Gupta R (2010) Trace elements in coal: associations with coal and minerals and their behavior during coal utilization–A review. Fuel 89(4):904–911 |
[51] | Wang L, Liang T (2015) Geochemical fractions of rare earth elements in soil around a mine tailing in Baotou, China. Scientific reports. 22(1):12483 |
[52] | Wang J, Sharma A, Tomita A (2003) Determination of the modes of occurrence of trace elements in coal by leaching coal and coal ashes. Energy Fuels 17(1):29–37 |
[53] | Wang J, Yang Z, Qin S, Panchal B, Sun Y, Niu H (2019) Distribution characteristics and migration patterns of hazardous trace elements in coal combustion products of power plants. Fuel 258:116062 |
[54] | Wang ZY, Fan HR, Zhou L, Yang KF, She HD (2020) Carbonatite-related REE deposits: an overview. Minerals 10(11):965 |
[55] | Wang J, Yan R, Liu Z, Wang J, Zhang P (2023) Evolution behavior of mineral structure and trace elements in feed coals from six coal-fired power plants in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(36):85759–85771 |
[56] | Ward CR (2016) Analysis, origin and significance of mineral matter in coal: an updated review. Int J Coal Geol 165:1–27 |
[57] | Wei Q, Cui C, Dai S (2020) Organic-association of Ge in the coal-hosted ore deposits: an experimental and theoretical approach. Ore Geol Rev 117:103291 |
[58] | Xiong Y, Ning Z, Liu Y, Gomez M, Xiao T (2022) Emission and transformation behaviors of trace elements during combustion of Cd-rich coals from coal combustion related endemic fluorosis areas of Southwest, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 246:114145 |
[59] | Zhang W, Rezaee M, Bhagavatula A, Li Y, Groppo J, Honaker R (2015) A review of the occurrence and promising recovery methods of rare earth elements from coal and coal by-products. Int J Coal Preparation Utilization 35(6):295–330 |
[60] | Zhao L, Sun J, Guo W, Wang P, Ji D (2016) Mineralogy of the Pennsylvanian coal seam in the Datanhao mine, Daqingshan Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China: genetic implications for mineral matter in coal deposited in an intermontane basin. Int J Coal Geol 167:201–214 |
[61] | Zhao L, Dai S, Nechaev VP, Nechaeva EV, Graham IT, French D, Sun J (2019) Enrichment of critical elements (Nb-Ta-Zr-Hf-REE) within coal and host rocks from the Datanhao mine, Daqingshan Coalfield, northern China. Ore Geol Rev 111:102951 |
19 September 2023
15 December 2023
30 July 2024
November -0001
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-024-00729-2